— Tom Cruise and Anthony Edwards as Lt. Pete "Maverick" Mitchell and Lt. Nick "Goose" Bradshaw from Top Gun, 1986
You are Here » News Chat » Underworld slightly underachieves
September 22, 2003
Underworld slightly underachieves
— Posted by John Campea
Perhaps the problem was my unrealistic high expectations, but I walked out of Underworld feeling a little bit cheated. What looked like a high budget visual effects feast for the eyes actually turned out to be a lower budget mood film that takes too many wrong turns with the plot and only short teases of battles between Vampires and Werewolves.
It should also be said that the performances were all respectfully adequate. Kate Beckinsale was particularly good in her role as a Vampire Death Dealer (Where exactly do you go to school to become a “Death Dealer”?), not to mention that she looked outrageously amazing in the aforementioned costumes (as did the rest of the cast).
The problems with the film basically revolve around a few too many and painfully self contradictory plot twists that had me whispering “oh come on” on more than one occasion. “These are the bad guys√¢‚Ç¨¬¶ no wait they’re the bad guys√¢‚Ç¨¬¶ no wait, umm√¢‚Ç¨¬¶ I’m going to get some more pop”.
Now, I’m the kind of guy who can forgive a bad movie IF it gives me a lot of fun stuff to look at. If nothing else, Underworld LOOKED like it would give me plenty of that. However, the commercials were really just an illusion. The only difference between humans and Vampires is that Vampires have colored contact lenses and fangs. That’s it. As far as the Werewolves are concerned, you hardly ever see them in the movie! Most of the time you just see slight glimpses or shadows. No real “FIGHT” happens between the Vamps and Weres in the film at all until the end between just 2 combatants.
There are a couple of fun scenes and decent visuals, but nothing that comes close to my admittedly high expectations. Its an ok film worth renting some afternoon.
This post was written by :
Around the Web