You are Here » News Chat » Director Talks About Why Elektra Failed
News Chat
October 17, 2005

Director Talks About Why Elektra Failed

— Posted by Rodney

Elektra was a total bomb in almost every meaning of the phrase. Critics hated it, the audience hated it and it’s probably already reserved it’s place on most “Worst Movies of 2005″ lists. Considering it forerunner Daredevil enjoyed modest success and Jennifer Garner was to be in even tighter and skimpier outfits this time out (not to mention a very well marketed kiss with another woman)… you’d figure it would have at least done “ok”. Nope.

But hand it to the guy. Rob Bowman, the director of Elektra had the guts to sit down with Now Playing and talk about his failure (say what you want… that takes a man) and offer some idea as to why the film failed so badly. Here’s an excerpt from that article:

“I knew going into the project, because of the short prep, because I only had Jennifer for her hiatus from Alias, which was ten weeks, and [because of] the short postproduction, that we weren’t going to be able to make Spider-Man,” says Bowman. “We didn’t have the time to make Spider-Man. We didn’t have the time to make Daredevil!”

Bowman is refreshingly candid – and good-natured – about the failure of the film, but he also is quick to defend his picture while also maintaining that he is aware of its shortcomings.“That was OK, because I was not making a movie about size and spectacle, about giant visual effects,” he continues. “The best movies are stories about people and their inner struggles – those are my favorite films. I finally said, ‘Let’s not get down about the fact that we don’t have the time to make Batman or Spider-Man. Let’s embrace what we do have, which is a very interesting character.’

Bowman goes on to talk about how surprised he was critics disliked the film since they usually cheer for a film that gets made with a relatively low budget (Elektra only had a $43 million budget… which is REALLY low for a comic movie).

My question is… why did they have to make it so fast? Why not wait until Garner had more than just 2 and a half months to shoot? Can you imagine that? A comic action film where you only have the lead character for 10 weeks of shooting? What was the rush? Were they afraid Garner was suddenly not going to be popular anymore in 12 months? To me that’s just crazy… and stupid.

In the end, Bowman seems to have a pretty healthy way of looking at it all. He goes on to say:

“The critics don’t care – they don’t care if you’re tired, they don’t care about anything except judging the movie,” he says. “It’s not like I didn’t try. It’s not like I didn’t use every trick in the book I had to pull that movie off in that short amount of time. And if you can’t handle people not liking what you do, you shouldn’t be in the business. That’s part of it, because telling a story on film is subjective, and not everybody is going to laugh at the jokes you laughed at. Your favorite movie may not be many other people’s favorite movie. And that’s the risk in making a product with a mass appeal – how do you figure out what all those people want? Don’t even try. Everybody likes ice cream, but not everybody likes chocolate ice cream.”

Good words. I’ll be interested to see what he ends up doing next… cause it sure won’t be Elektra 2.

This post was written by :

who has written 8885 posts on The Movie Blog

visit author's website | Contact the Author

  • http://www.aquick.org/blog Adam Fields

    This is the genius whose major previous accomplishments were the shining gems of theatrical boredom “X-Files: Fight the Future” and “Reign of Fire”. The evidence is strong that Elektra sucked, Mr. Bowman, because you’re just not that good a director.

    A good movie would change my mind. Complaining about why the previous ones were bad won’t.

  • SpideyFan

    It’s pretty basic – it sucked because it was bad.

    I mean, really.

    Let’s not over anaylyze a bad movie. Elektra just didn’t have a good story, had silly action scenes, and the acting was horrible.

    But yeah, there are other reasons, like the movie just SUCKS.

  • jack black

    Don’t get me wrong, I love super-hero movies (well, most of them) my aside about Greek mythology was purely centered on characters such as Pandora, Achilles, Narcissus, and yes, Elektra, who have become bywords for human frailty and the deeper textures of the human condition. I simply do not see any of this in comic book characters, and think it unlikely the academics of the future will ponder the virtue of these tales either. A modern equivalent of the ancient mythologies would be the wild west and the westerns based on these times by the likes of Ford, Sturges, Peckinpah and Leone. Sorry, I’m getting off track here.

  • Herby

    This movie sucked because the script sucked.

    I was a huge Daredevil and Electra fan, espiecially during the Frank Miller Days. Frank Miller’s Electra Graphic Novel with the most incedible illustrations by Bill Sienkiewicz should have been the source material for the story we saw up on that screen instead of the cliched crap we saw.

  • http://www.thedudeblog.com chark hammis

    Whatchoo talking? Batman was character driven, Road to Perdition was character driven, Spidey 1 and 2 were character driven– the list goes on. To say comics are only available for crash-bang-boom is crazy. They are the modern equivalent of Greek mythology. It’s how they’re played out by the guy at the helm that dictates crap or not.

  • jack black

    If you’re looking for good stories, suggest you look elsewhere. The world of the super-hero saga exists within very narrow parameters, if you can attach some philosophy to it you’re not only a better man than me, but just about all the script writers working in this field today. The truth is, working to such a brief allows for little story telling other than the usual crash bang wallop, good over bad. Greek mythology it ain’t.

  • http://www.thedudeblog.com chark hammis

    To hear interviews like this reaffirm my inclination that Hollywood people are totally unconnected from reality and need to get outside their “Yes-Man” bubble. Man, that Rob didn’t take responsibility for crap. He made weak excuses for a POS movie.

    Aeon Flux looks like a pile of stanky, steamy “more of the same” too.

    All these ladies look great in their superhero outfits, but man- I don’t give hang about that. I care about being entertained with a story, not being knocked over the head with seductive poses, stupid, incoherent action and rehashed characters.

  • Simone

    I agree, I am even quite excited to watch Aeon Flux, I think it will rock!

  • Jeremy P.

    Maybe it just sucked because it was about a character, who with all her special superhero skills, was already killed in a fight with a deck of cards.

Around the Web
"People need dramatic examples to shake them out of apathy, and I can’t do that as Bruce Wayne. As a man, I’m flesh and blood; I can be ignored, I can be destroyed. But as a symbol… as a symbol I can be incorruptible. I can be everlasting."

—Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman from Batman Begins, 2005

    Archives