 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sean Connery &#8220;Considering&#8221; Indiana Jones 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:41:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frances</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77865</link>
		<dc:creator>Frances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77865</guid>
		<description>Uh you guys act as if Sean Connery is essential to the franchise. He&#039;s only been in ONE of the films. They&#039;re always mixing up the cast in these films. I&#039;d personally like to see Jonathan Rhys Davies instead of Sean Connery (not a fan) but perhaps I&#039;m the weird one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh you guys act as if Sean Connery is essential to the franchise. He&#8217;s only been in ONE of the films. They&#8217;re always mixing up the cast in these films. I&#8217;d personally like to see Jonathan Rhys Davies instead of Sean Connery (not a fan) but perhaps I&#8217;m the weird one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77864</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77864</guid>
		<description>http://www.theraider.net/news/fullstory_indy4.php?id=122

Well, judging by the interview, he hasn&#039;t gotten a copy of the script, which could mean he probably won&#039;t be involved in the next movie and quite frankly even if he said no, I&#039;m sure any gifted script-writer could simply remove the character and his lines from the screenplay or just edit out the scenes where he was meant to be used(assuming of course he will be used in this movie).
Because if he hasn&#039;t been reached at this point, there&#039;s a chance we won&#039;t see Indy&#039;s father in this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theraider.net/news/fullstory_indy4.php?id=122" rel="nofollow">http://www.theraider.net/news/fullstory_indy4.php?id=122</a></p>
<p>Well, judging by the interview, he hasn&#8217;t gotten a copy of the script, which could mean he probably won&#8217;t be involved in the next movie and quite frankly even if he said no, I&#8217;m sure any gifted script-writer could simply remove the character and his lines from the screenplay or just edit out the scenes where he was meant to be used(assuming of course he will be used in this movie).<br />
Because if he hasn&#8217;t been reached at this point, there&#8217;s a chance we won&#8217;t see Indy&#8217;s father in this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane razey</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77863</link>
		<dc:creator>shane razey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77863</guid>
		<description>Wait.
It already is worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait.<br />
It already is worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane razey</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77862</link>
		<dc:creator>shane razey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77862</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with DirtyRobot.

Just let it go, or this will be much worse than Halo ever dreamed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with DirtyRobot.</p>
<p>Just let it go, or this will be much worse than Halo ever dreamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zer00</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77861</link>
		<dc:creator>Zer00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77861</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t uncommon practice, John. I doubt he has a significant role anyway. And he&#039;ll probably take it anyway but is just saying &quot;considering&quot;

aren&#039;t you always the one that says you shouldn&#039;t listen to actors? Or is that just when it&#039;s convenient?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t uncommon practice, John. I doubt he has a significant role anyway. And he&#8217;ll probably take it anyway but is just saying &#8220;considering&#8221;</p>
<p>aren&#8217;t you always the one that says you shouldn&#8217;t listen to actors? Or is that just when it&#8217;s convenient?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77860</guid>
		<description>&quot;i think the whole &quot;eternal life&quot; thing only worked if they didn&#039;t pass the seal. correct me if i&#039;m wrong anyone.&quot;


You&#039;re correct. People seem to never understand the end of The Last Crusade, but I thought they made it pretty obvious. Yes, the grail gave eternal life, but the price to pay was to stay within the seal. Once you pass the seal, life eternal is no more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;i think the whole &#8220;eternal life&#8221; thing only worked if they didn&#8217;t pass the seal. correct me if i&#8217;m wrong anyone.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct. People seem to never understand the end of The Last Crusade, but I thought they made it pretty obvious. Yes, the grail gave eternal life, but the price to pay was to stay within the seal. Once you pass the seal, life eternal is no more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77859</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77859</guid>
		<description>Fuck replacing Indy. That&#039;s so stupid.

Anyway onto the point... obviously, if they haven&#039;t got Connery signed on, it&#039;s probably a very small and insignificant part. Use your head, John, that&#039;s obvious. They&#039;ve already done the father-son storyline, so they&#039;re not going to do it AGAIN.

To those STILL doubting, it&#039;s **SHOOTING IN JUNE**. It&#039;s happening. This is absolutely NOTHING like the Halo situation, give me a break. I respect those of you that don&#039;t want it to happen, because as the self-proclaimed biggest Indiana Jones fan in the world, I&#039;d prefer it NOT to.

But since it is, and since Spielberg, Ford, Marshall and Lucas have all OK&#039;d the script, I&#039;m SO down for another adventure with my favorite whip-wielding hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck replacing Indy. That&#8217;s so stupid.</p>
<p>Anyway onto the point&#8230; obviously, if they haven&#8217;t got Connery signed on, it&#8217;s probably a very small and insignificant part. Use your head, John, that&#8217;s obvious. They&#8217;ve already done the father-son storyline, so they&#8217;re not going to do it AGAIN.</p>
<p>To those STILL doubting, it&#8217;s **SHOOTING IN JUNE**. It&#8217;s happening. This is absolutely NOTHING like the Halo situation, give me a break. I respect those of you that don&#8217;t want it to happen, because as the self-proclaimed biggest Indiana Jones fan in the world, I&#8217;d prefer it NOT to.</p>
<p>But since it is, and since Spielberg, Ford, Marshall and Lucas have all OK&#8217;d the script, I&#8217;m SO down for another adventure with my favorite whip-wielding hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77858</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77858</guid>
		<description>People keep saying Nathan Fillion should replace Indy...

NO WAY! He&#039;s a cool guy and charming in his own way, but come on guys, he&#039;s nowhere near right for the character. Indiana Jones is a cool, laconic guy who you can imagine spending a lot of time in the library. Fillion has cornered the market in playing smartarse jocks who you can imagine spending a lot of time in the gym.  

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I really like the guy and like pretty much everything he&#039;s done so far. But I think he&#039;d be a horrible replacement for Harrison Ford and I really can&#039;t see why so many people keep putting his name forward in Indy 4 threads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People keep saying Nathan Fillion should replace Indy&#8230;</p>
<p>NO WAY! He&#8217;s a cool guy and charming in his own way, but come on guys, he&#8217;s nowhere near right for the character. Indiana Jones is a cool, laconic guy who you can imagine spending a lot of time in the library. Fillion has cornered the market in playing smartarse jocks who you can imagine spending a lot of time in the gym.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I really like the guy and like pretty much everything he&#8217;s done so far. But I think he&#8217;d be a horrible replacement for Harrison Ford and I really can&#8217;t see why so many people keep putting his name forward in Indy 4 threads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirtyRobot</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77857</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtyRobot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77857</guid>
		<description>Indiana Jones IV ???  Just quit it!  Stop it!  NOW!  Move along!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indiana Jones IV ???  Just quit it!  Stop it!  NOW!  Move along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: movie collectibles</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77856</link>
		<dc:creator>movie collectibles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/01/sean-connery-considering-indiana-jones-4#comment-77856</guid>
		<description>prophecy,

i think the whole &quot;eternal life&quot; thing only worked if they didn&#039;t pass the seal. correct me if i&#039;m wrong anyone.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prophecy,</p>
<p>i think the whole &#8220;eternal life&#8221; thing only worked if they didn&#8217;t pass the seal. correct me if i&#8217;m wrong anyone.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
