 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matthew Vaughn Says He Could Have Done X-Men 3 100x Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:14:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-100565</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-100565</guid>
		<description>It wouldn&#039;t be hard to do X3 100 times better- it made X-Men seem like Mutant X.  &#039;Nuff Said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be hard to do X3 100 times better- it made X-Men seem like Mutant X.  &#8216;Nuff Said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99741</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99741</guid>
		<description>With one simple bit of direction, telling Famke to stop staring blankly and start acting like the psychotic, egotistical vixen that we all know The Dark Phoenix really is, would have increased the movie by at least 50x&#039;s. So, yeah, 100 shouldn&#039;t be too hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With one simple bit of direction, telling Famke to stop staring blankly and start acting like the psychotic, egotistical vixen that we all know The Dark Phoenix really is, would have increased the movie by at least 50x&#8217;s. So, yeah, 100 shouldn&#8217;t be too hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Kelhoffer</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99726</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Kelhoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99726</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the choices that would have differed Matthew Vaughn&#039;s over Ratner&#039;s, even if the script was the same. First off, things often change from script to screen. Dialogue can change on the wim, if its not working, and I think we can all say that there was some lame dialogue in X3 as is (mostly from Storm). Maybe he would have emphasized on things more.  His direction would have probably been different. Color tones maybe.  Most like the final cut istelf would have been differently. It&#039;s the whole director&#039;s touch thing. It&#039;s kinda hard to explian, like say Steven Spielberg directed Transformers instead of Mifchael Bay, but used the same script, word for word, but it would still be competely different from what actually exists.

Now, a hundred times better? I don&#039;t know. Thats like saying that if Richard Donner continued to work on Superman 2, it would be a hundred times better. (&quot;The Richard Donner Cut&quot; doesnt count because Donner never finished working on the film and it is comprised using what they had..but even if it does, its not a &quot;100 times better&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the choices that would have differed Matthew Vaughn&#8217;s over Ratner&#8217;s, even if the script was the same. First off, things often change from script to screen. Dialogue can change on the wim, if its not working, and I think we can all say that there was some lame dialogue in X3 as is (mostly from Storm). Maybe he would have emphasized on things more.  His direction would have probably been different. Color tones maybe.  Most like the final cut istelf would have been differently. It&#8217;s the whole director&#8217;s touch thing. It&#8217;s kinda hard to explian, like say Steven Spielberg directed Transformers instead of Mifchael Bay, but used the same script, word for word, but it would still be competely different from what actually exists.</p>
<p>Now, a hundred times better? I don&#8217;t know. Thats like saying that if Richard Donner continued to work on Superman 2, it would be a hundred times better. (&#8221;The Richard Donner Cut&#8221; doesnt count because Donner never finished working on the film and it is comprised using what they had..but even if it does, its not a &#8220;100 times better&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99652</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99652</guid>
		<description>Ratner&#039;s not to blame, seems to be a motto around here.

Nobody forced him to accept a project that was such a train-wreck in waiting by the time he came on board.

He chose to take over the project under those circumstances instead of walking.

Fox has the lion-share of blame, but anyone who 
*chose* to work on the project knowing the state it was in (and lets face it, if half the internet knew, a director must have known) can&#039;t be absolved completely of blame.

Equally, Vaughn left the project, so it&#039;s a little unprofessional to be playing games of &quot;I coulda done better&quot; especially as most reviews of Stardust are saying he himself could&#039;ve done better on the project he actually did do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratner&#8217;s not to blame, seems to be a motto around here.</p>
<p>Nobody forced him to accept a project that was such a train-wreck in waiting by the time he came on board.</p>
<p>He chose to take over the project under those circumstances instead of walking.</p>
<p>Fox has the lion-share of blame, but anyone who<br />
*chose* to work on the project knowing the state it was in (and lets face it, if half the internet knew, a director must have known) can&#8217;t be absolved completely of blame.</p>
<p>Equally, Vaughn left the project, so it&#8217;s a little unprofessional to be playing games of &#8220;I coulda done better&#8221; especially as most reviews of Stardust are saying he himself could&#8217;ve done better on the project he actually did do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason presti</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99637</link>
		<dc:creator>jason presti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99637</guid>
		<description>This issue is a moot point. Bret Ratner took the brunt of X-men 3 because the general movie-going audience and people who did NOT follow the behind the scenes drama Only know him.

Those of us who followed this film closely know that Ratner had NOTHING to do with X-men 3&#039;s failures even though I generally dislike him.

X-men 3&#039;s failures fall squarely on the shoulders of 20th Century Fox execs, specifically Tom Rothman?(forget his name exactly).

Ratner did NOT approve X3&#039;s small budget, Rothman did!

Ratner did NOT set X3&#039;s incredibly rushed production schedule, Rothman did!

By the time Ratner came onboard the script was already finished so we cannot blame the bizarre plotlines on him.

Look, X3&#039;s fate was a bizarre occurence in Hollywood. X3 was ruined by one man&#039;s insane personal revenge crusade.

Tom Rothman was insanely angry at Bryan Singer for taking Superman Returns and his vendetta spiraled into something unbelievable.

X3&#039;s rushed shooting schedule was because Rothman didn&#039;t want to be beat out of the gate by Singer&#039;s Superman.

I fully believe that Cyclop&#039;s(James Marsden&#039;s) horribly written story and fate in X3 was revenge by Rothman for siding with Singer and taking a role in Superman Returns AND a message to everyone NOT to Fuck with him!

I am a huge comic fan and did some research and found out some things that will make you all happy.

Thankfully, Marvel Comics was NOT happy with X3 in any way, shape, or form and they let their displeasure be known.  After X3 came out Marvel put out a statement to 20th Century Fox politely telling them that X3 did NOT fit into Marvel&#039;s vision for it&#039;s movie franchise and that they may have to re-evaluate their relationship with FOX.

Not long after this Marvel set plans in motion to create their own Movie Production company which leads us to Iron Man today.

X3 did serve one good purpose. It pissed Marvel off so bad they finally got tired of OTHER movie companies fucking up their franchises and now they will be making their OWN films with NO studio interference...hopefully!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This issue is a moot point. Bret Ratner took the brunt of X-men 3 because the general movie-going audience and people who did NOT follow the behind the scenes drama Only know him.</p>
<p>Those of us who followed this film closely know that Ratner had NOTHING to do with X-men 3&#8217;s failures even though I generally dislike him.</p>
<p>X-men 3&#8217;s failures fall squarely on the shoulders of 20th Century Fox execs, specifically Tom Rothman?(forget his name exactly).</p>
<p>Ratner did NOT approve X3&#8217;s small budget, Rothman did!</p>
<p>Ratner did NOT set X3&#8217;s incredibly rushed production schedule, Rothman did!</p>
<p>By the time Ratner came onboard the script was already finished so we cannot blame the bizarre plotlines on him.</p>
<p>Look, X3&#8217;s fate was a bizarre occurence in Hollywood. X3 was ruined by one man&#8217;s insane personal revenge crusade.</p>
<p>Tom Rothman was insanely angry at Bryan Singer for taking Superman Returns and his vendetta spiraled into something unbelievable.</p>
<p>X3&#8217;s rushed shooting schedule was because Rothman didn&#8217;t want to be beat out of the gate by Singer&#8217;s Superman.</p>
<p>I fully believe that Cyclop&#8217;s(James Marsden&#8217;s) horribly written story and fate in X3 was revenge by Rothman for siding with Singer and taking a role in Superman Returns AND a message to everyone NOT to Fuck with him!</p>
<p>I am a huge comic fan and did some research and found out some things that will make you all happy.</p>
<p>Thankfully, Marvel Comics was NOT happy with X3 in any way, shape, or form and they let their displeasure be known.  After X3 came out Marvel put out a statement to 20th Century Fox politely telling them that X3 did NOT fit into Marvel&#8217;s vision for it&#8217;s movie franchise and that they may have to re-evaluate their relationship with FOX.</p>
<p>Not long after this Marvel set plans in motion to create their own Movie Production company which leads us to Iron Man today.</p>
<p>X3 did serve one good purpose. It pissed Marvel off so bad they finally got tired of OTHER movie companies fucking up their franchises and now they will be making their OWN films with NO studio interference&#8230;hopefully!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotmale</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99624</link>
		<dc:creator>hotmale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99624</guid>
		<description>Layer Cake is one of the best movies ever.  With that one sentence, Darren, everything you said has been negated!  I luved the ending of Layer Cake so much.  All his worries about other things and then he gets it from someone he didn&#039;t even think about...luv it.  That was probably a spoiler...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Layer Cake is one of the best movies ever.  With that one sentence, Darren, everything you said has been negated!  I luved the ending of Layer Cake so much.  All his worries about other things and then he gets it from someone he didn&#8217;t even think about&#8230;luv it.  That was probably a spoiler&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99623</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99623</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know much about Matthew Vaughn, but I don&#039;t think he would have had to work too hard in order to make it better. The beast (ha ha) that was unleashed upon theater-goers was ridiculous. To say that the film was a disaster gives it too much credit. Instead, I simply pretend that the events of the third film never happened. I mean, the writer/director/executives that decided to kill [name withheld], [name withheld] and [name withheld] needs to be put in movie jail. Then let out in 10 years, lol.

This film was so blatantly created by suits who care for nothing but the bottom line (i.e. establish two spin-off films, kill off expensive cast members, etc.).

What I&#039;m really trying to say is &quot;I hated X-Men 3&quot;. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much about Matthew Vaughn, but I don&#8217;t think he would have had to work too hard in order to make it better. The beast (ha ha) that was unleashed upon theater-goers was ridiculous. To say that the film was a disaster gives it too much credit. Instead, I simply pretend that the events of the third film never happened. I mean, the writer/director/executives that decided to kill [name withheld], [name withheld] and [name withheld] needs to be put in movie jail. Then let out in 10 years, lol.</p>
<p>This film was so blatantly created by suits who care for nothing but the bottom line (i.e. establish two spin-off films, kill off expensive cast members, etc.).</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m really trying to say is &#8220;I hated X-Men 3&#8243;. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99600</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99600</guid>
		<description>Well...time for my two cents.

1. &lt;em&gt;Could he have done better?&lt;/em&gt; Maybe, not by much. As mentioned, Vaughn, before he left, did have the cast in place-including Kelsey Grammar and Vinnie Jones (the two of the three *major* new additions to the series)  and the script concept would have been very close. Shit on Ratner all you want to- but in my opinion, Ratner *was* brung in on short notice and got the film done.
Every director&#039;s directing style is different. But, unless I miss my guess, under Vaughn&#039;s tenure, we knew this about the &lt;em&gt;X:Men Last Stand&lt;/em&gt; story at the time:

&lt;strong&gt;major characters will die&lt;/strong&gt;
Which is one of the common charges on Ratner. Now I&#039;m not the biggest Ratner fan. But I do like some of his films, including the third X-Men film. 

2. &lt;em&gt; So now that Vaughn has said this...&lt;/em&gt; If he backs out at the last minute on &lt;strong&gt; THOR&lt;/strong&gt; and whoever directs it directs it at the drop of a hat, under a time limit, under a fixed budget, and when the fanboys rake said director X over the coals...will Vaughn come out a year later and say &quot;Well, I could have done better!&quot;

Well, shit on brick.
I&#039;M SORRY Mr. Vaughn. YOU left X-Men. You couldn&#039;t have done a better job, Period. So you better not leave Thor. In fact, you better make Thor a kick ass movie and show the universe how to make a great comics based movie. Either that or don&#039;t say you&#039;re better than Ratner.

By The Way, since we all seem to roll over Mr. Ratner right now, let me say this: Ratner, had he been the first choice, could have made a better Layer Cake. I HATED Layer Cake. I honestly believe that if I hadn&#039;t seen Daniel Craig in other films, I might have not gone to see Casino Royale. 
Serious.

And I have serious doubts on Thor. So now Vaughn has the chance, she better not blow it to hell, and have something to back up his shit.

What arrogance.

Look, I don&#039;t love all of Ratners films. And even if I hated every last one of them AND X-3, I&#039;d still say Vaughn is full of junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;time for my two cents.</p>
<p>1. <em>Could he have done better?</em> Maybe, not by much. As mentioned, Vaughn, before he left, did have the cast in place-including Kelsey Grammar and Vinnie Jones (the two of the three *major* new additions to the series)  and the script concept would have been very close. Shit on Ratner all you want to- but in my opinion, Ratner *was* brung in on short notice and got the film done.<br />
Every director&#8217;s directing style is different. But, unless I miss my guess, under Vaughn&#8217;s tenure, we knew this about the <em>X:Men Last Stand</em> story at the time:</p>
<p><strong>major characters will die</strong><br />
Which is one of the common charges on Ratner. Now I&#8217;m not the biggest Ratner fan. But I do like some of his films, including the third X-Men film. </p>
<p>2. <em> So now that Vaughn has said this&#8230;</em> If he backs out at the last minute on <strong> THOR</strong> and whoever directs it directs it at the drop of a hat, under a time limit, under a fixed budget, and when the fanboys rake said director X over the coals&#8230;will Vaughn come out a year later and say &#8220;Well, I could have done better!&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, shit on brick.<br />
I&#8217;M SORRY Mr. Vaughn. YOU left X-Men. You couldn&#8217;t have done a better job, Period. So you better not leave Thor. In fact, you better make Thor a kick ass movie and show the universe how to make a great comics based movie. Either that or don&#8217;t say you&#8217;re better than Ratner.</p>
<p>By The Way, since we all seem to roll over Mr. Ratner right now, let me say this: Ratner, had he been the first choice, could have made a better Layer Cake. I HATED Layer Cake. I honestly believe that if I hadn&#8217;t seen Daniel Craig in other films, I might have not gone to see Casino Royale.<br />
Serious.</p>
<p>And I have serious doubts on Thor. So now Vaughn has the chance, she better not blow it to hell, and have something to back up his shit.</p>
<p>What arrogance.</p>
<p>Look, I don&#8217;t love all of Ratners films. And even if I hated every last one of them AND X-3, I&#8217;d still say Vaughn is full of junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99596</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99596</guid>
		<description>While X-men 3 didn&#039;t kill the trilogy for me, it certainly was a disappointment when compared to my satisfaction with the first and second films.

100&#039;s may just be his way of conveying &quot;i could make it better&quot;...

kinda like threatening someone you&#039;ll &quot;kill em&quot; if they don&#039;t do something.  Not like you would per se, but it helps give them contrast.


PS.  I HATED the final battle on x-men 3, really that was the major element of ED for the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While X-men 3 didn&#8217;t kill the trilogy for me, it certainly was a disappointment when compared to my satisfaction with the first and second films.</p>
<p>100&#8217;s may just be his way of conveying &#8220;i could make it better&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>kinda like threatening someone you&#8217;ll &#8220;kill em&#8221; if they don&#8217;t do something.  Not like you would per se, but it helps give them contrast.</p>
<p>PS.  I HATED the final battle on x-men 3, really that was the major element of ED for the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotmale</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99593</link>
		<dc:creator>hotmale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/10/matthew-vaughn-says-he-could-have-done-xmen-3-better-than-ratner#comment-99593</guid>
		<description>...well who couldn&#039;t of made X-Men 3 100 times better than it was.  It was complete trash.  But, then again, I&#039;m in the majority when I say I thought the first X-men movie was way better than the 2nd one as well.  Atleast it was sooo bad as Spiderman 3 was tho.  Spidey 3 made me hate the entire franchise because of what the did with it...like completely building up Harry&#039;s character for 2 movies just to have him be the worst part of Spidey 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;well who couldn&#8217;t of made X-Men 3 100 times better than it was.  It was complete trash.  But, then again, I&#8217;m in the majority when I say I thought the first X-men movie was way better than the 2nd one as well.  Atleast it was sooo bad as Spiderman 3 was tho.  Spidey 3 made me hate the entire franchise because of what the did with it&#8230;like completely building up Harry&#8217;s character for 2 movies just to have him be the worst part of Spidey 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
