<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matthew Perry To Star in &#8216;17&#8242;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/matthew-perry-to-star-in-17/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/matthew-perry-to-star-in-17</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GODFATHER</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/matthew-perry-to-star-in-17#comment-108741</link>
		<dc:creator>GODFATHER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/matthew-perry-to-star-in-17#comment-108741</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on the Studio 60 decision, but I didn&#039;t really think A Whole Nine Yards was that great a role for Chandler! LOL

He needs a role that pushes his creativity and comedic timing, but a ho-hum comedy won&#039;t do it. Only problem is, I don&#039;t see Hollywood doing too many good movies lately...Well, at least original ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on the Studio 60 decision, but I didn&#8217;t really think A Whole Nine Yards was that great a role for Chandler! LOL</p>
<p>He needs a role that pushes his creativity and comedic timing, but a ho-hum comedy won&#8217;t do it. Only problem is, I don&#8217;t see Hollywood doing too many good movies lately&#8230;Well, at least original ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
