Comments on: McG To Direct Terminator 4

By: vargas

vargas — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:39:45 +0000

And why do we need a Terminator 4? Terminator 3 sucked dog doo. I wish they’d give it a rest.

By: Josh Kelhoffer

Josh Kelhoffer — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:03:49 +0000

McG is not the right choice for this. His style does not match the Terminator style.

By: chris (the real one)

chris (the real one) — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:05:08 +0000

charlies angels 1 was overrated with ok action but ugly chicks but had bill murray and cool villian……2 was more of the same but no bill murray and crappier special effects…..his best flick was we are marshall…..nice lil football movie

don have much faith in this one, oh well….fox series looks bad too

By: Kristina

Kristina — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:56:47 +0000

God help us all.

By: Phil Gee

Phil Gee — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:52:32 +0000

Aaaaaaaaah Full Throttle!

Just out of interest John, what is the worst movie title you’ve ever heard, because this one will do for me. I refuse to say it to the person that gives me my movie ticket (assuming i even see the film).

By: Rafa1215

Rafa1215 — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:50:13 +0000

He can do great action films. He has an eye for it. Hey it was either him or Brett Ratner. Who would you want?

By: Meli

Meli — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:45:10 +0000

This is crappy news -sigh-

By: Klendathu

Klendathu — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:41:28 +0000

“Hi, welcome to McDonalds, how may I help you?”

“Yes, I’d like the McG, please”

By: Melbye

Melbye — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:33:58 +0000

I don’t know what to think of this. CA was good, CA 2 was not so good. But Terminator is so diffrent from CA, where CA was a like rollercoaster-ride Terminator is pretty depressing. But he is a producer on Supernatural so maybe he can do it