 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrek 4 Confirmed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:09:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: miley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-210554</link>
		<dc:creator>miley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-210554</guid>
		<description>i hate 2 say this but i did not like the shrek the 3rd &amp; 1st.no humour it&#039;s all uuuuuuuuuuuuuggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
now shrek 2 that was cool!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate 2 say this but i did not like the shrek the 3rd &amp; 1st.no humour it&#8217;s all uuuuuuuuuuuuuggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
now shrek 2 that was cool!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattiac</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107536</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107536</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to say that Shrek 3 was a lousy movie! :( I don&#039;t think that 4 and 5 will be better than the great 2 or the almost as great 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to say that Shrek 3 was a lousy movie! :( I don&#8217;t think that 4 and 5 will be better than the great 2 or the almost as great 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jim Walker</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107412</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107412</guid>
		<description>I have 4 words fo rthe makers of Shrek 4: UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 4 words fo rthe makers of Shrek 4: UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107355</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107355</guid>
		<description>Fuck this.....and kids aren&#039;t into this turd anymore.  It&#039;s all about Hannah Montana now, baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck this&#8230;..and kids aren&#8217;t into this turd anymore.  It&#8217;s all about Hannah Montana now, baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbakid2000</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107354</link>
		<dc:creator>nbakid2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107354</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t hate the third one as much as other people did but it certainly wasn&#039;t very memorable.

Hopefully they&#039;ll think up some better stuff for the fourth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t hate the third one as much as other people did but it certainly wasn&#8217;t very memorable.</p>
<p>Hopefully they&#8217;ll think up some better stuff for the fourth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sound Designer Dan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107296</link>
		<dc:creator>Sound Designer Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107296</guid>
		<description>I think the problem with the Shrek series (despite my love for the first one) is that it relies too much on pop culture references to be memorable.  Another problem is that the series is that it&#039;s already on autopilot.  They think that &quot;Oh, it&#039;s Shrek so it&#039;s gonna make a shitload of money!&quot;  The third installment has already made $795 million worldwide so a fourth one is already inevitable.  It&#039;s sad that a great work of animation like Ratatouille is always lose to the fugly ogre like Shrek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem with the Shrek series (despite my love for the first one) is that it relies too much on pop culture references to be memorable.  Another problem is that the series is that it&#8217;s already on autopilot.  They think that &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s Shrek so it&#8217;s gonna make a shitload of money!&#8221;  The third installment has already made $795 million worldwide so a fourth one is already inevitable.  It&#8217;s sad that a great work of animation like Ratatouille is always lose to the fugly ogre like Shrek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chisox</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107278</link>
		<dc:creator>Chisox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107278</guid>
		<description>Yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melbye</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107212</link>
		<dc:creator>Melbye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2007/11/shrek-4-confirmed#comment-107212</guid>
		<description>The Problem with the first 2 was that they are only funny the first time you see them, Shrek 3 wasn&#039;t funny at all. I have serious doubts number 4 and 5 will be good at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Problem with the first 2 was that they are only funny the first time you see them, Shrek 3 wasn&#8217;t funny at all. I have serious doubts number 4 and 5 will be good at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
