Comments on: 27 Dresses takes on Cloverfield

By: FoxIsStupid

FoxIsStupid — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:36:54 +0000

This is such a dumb thing for Fox to do. Umm, do I want to take on a movie about robbing a church and a budget knight movie or do I want to take on the biggest monster movie in years AND take on a comedy that looks like it actually will be funny? Fox, stick to the Simpsons.

By: CW05

CW05 — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:51:39 +0000

The Cloverfield monster is going to rip her 27 dresses to shreds. :)

By: Kristina

Kristina — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:24:52 +0000

I’m a chick, and I cannot stand these formulaic flicks. Fuck ‘em all. I’ll take monsters killing people in NYC over neurotic women whining about relationship issues any day.

By: Shane

Shane — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:58:25 +0000

What looks like s*** is another movie about some poor little girl who can’t get a date and just wants to meet that special someone if only she could realize her inner beauty. Hold on – throwing up. Cry me a river. Why do I want to bore myself with that crap? Give me Queen Latifah bein’ strong and Katie Holmes bein’ sexy and Diane Keaton bein’… Diane Keaton any time over some trumped-up wannabe.

By: Meli

Meli — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:55:28 +0000

My money is definitely going to Cloverfield that weekend! Chick flicks of this nature are best seen either on cable or not at all.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:33:37 +0000

That other ensemble chick flick will be no competition for 27 Dresses. 27 Dresses looks 10 times better than that piece of s***. Have you seen the trailer for Mad Money? OMG. Diane Keaton deserves so much better.