 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Al Pacino Be Bond Villain?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:38:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: takata</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120732</link>
		<dc:creator>takata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120732</guid>
		<description>Its just me or Pacino is looking EXTRA WACKY on that pic?
Man i dont know Pacino is that type of actor who puts himself over the role all the time.
So its not a bad thing if you are insanely good like he is,but to go well,depends a lot in what kind of role is playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its just me or Pacino is looking EXTRA WACKY on that pic?<br />
Man i dont know Pacino is that type of actor who puts himself over the role all the time.<br />
So its not a bad thing if you are insanely good like he is,but to go well,depends a lot in what kind of role is playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1.21 Gigawatts!!!</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120684</link>
		<dc:creator>1.21 Gigawatts!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120684</guid>
		<description>Not sure why Pacino would want to turn up in a meaningless cameo role.  He is still a great actor.  

As his mate De Niro famously said, &quot;The talent is in the choices&quot;

As the blog points out, Pacino hasn&#039;t made a killer film in years.  Perhaps the talent is deserting him of late...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why Pacino would want to turn up in a meaningless cameo role.  He is still a great actor.  </p>
<p>As his mate De Niro famously said, &#8220;The talent is in the choices&#8221;</p>
<p>As the blog points out, Pacino hasn&#8217;t made a killer film in years.  Perhaps the talent is deserting him of late&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DONALD</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120681</link>
		<dc:creator>DONALD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120681</guid>
		<description>I am just generally disappointed that they did not bring back Blowfeld. I thought they could have made him the leader of the new terrorist organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just generally disappointed that they did not bring back Blowfeld. I thought they could have made him the leader of the new terrorist organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120656</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120656</guid>
		<description>Sidenote to clarify: that&#039;s not directed at Doug, but to the &quot;internet community&quot; in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidenote to clarify: that&#8217;s not directed at Doug, but to the &#8220;internet community&#8221; in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120655</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120655</guid>
		<description>Ths news pisses me off. Not that Pacino may be in the film, but rather this &lt;em&gt;bullshit&lt;/em&gt; respose from the int&#039;l friends and those clowns on the Cinematical boards.

What the hell is everyone&#039;s problem over this rumor?! 
IF it is true, what does the above say????????????

&quot;Cameo&quot;

READ THAT AGAIN.
What does that mean? It means he&#039;s in the film for a minute or two. Right? That&#039;s essentially what a cameo is. 

SECOND. 
He&#039;s an actor. Not just any actor, but one of the biggest names a production can get on a payroll. Is that accurate? Help me out here...anyone...jump in...

THIRD
He&#039;s an actor. He could wear makeup. He could shave his head. He could do a handstand. Without CGI.

FOUR.
Be glad it isn&#039;t 50 Cent.

End of story.
By the way, a blonde James Bond sucks walnuts. right?
You fanboys out there can be so damn pathetic sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ths news pisses me off. Not that Pacino may be in the film, but rather this <em>bullshit</em> respose from the int&#8217;l friends and those clowns on the Cinematical boards.</p>
<p>What the hell is everyone&#8217;s problem over this rumor?!<br />
IF it is true, what does the above say????????????</p>
<p>&#8220;Cameo&#8221;</p>
<p>READ THAT AGAIN.<br />
What does that mean? It means he&#8217;s in the film for a minute or two. Right? That&#8217;s essentially what a cameo is. </p>
<p>SECOND.<br />
He&#8217;s an actor. Not just any actor, but one of the biggest names a production can get on a payroll. Is that accurate? Help me out here&#8230;anyone&#8230;jump in&#8230;</p>
<p>THIRD<br />
He&#8217;s an actor. He could wear makeup. He could shave his head. He could do a handstand. Without CGI.</p>
<p>FOUR.<br />
Be glad it isn&#8217;t 50 Cent.</p>
<p>End of story.<br />
By the way, a blonde James Bond sucks walnuts. right?<br />
You fanboys out there can be so damn pathetic sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Carroll</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120652</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120652</guid>
		<description>I hope he isn&#039;t in it. He is very over rated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope he isn&#8217;t in it. He is very over rated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick King</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120645</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120645</guid>
		<description>Doug, with that picture, I see another &quot;What is he thinking?&quot; post. For example, &quot;Why in hell did I colour my hair?!?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, with that picture, I see another &#8220;What is he thinking?&#8221; post. For example, &#8220;Why in hell did I colour my hair?!?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120640</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120640</guid>
		<description>Is he actually going to ACT, or is he going to collect a check?  There&#039;s a difference.  If it&#039;s the former, then I&#039;m fine with it.  If it&#039;s a the latter, then I&#039;m bummed that the producers have resorted to stunt casting to get publicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is he actually going to ACT, or is he going to collect a check?  There&#8217;s a difference.  If it&#8217;s the former, then I&#8217;m fine with it.  If it&#8217;s a the latter, then I&#8217;m bummed that the producers have resorted to stunt casting to get publicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougnagy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120630</link>
		<dc:creator>dougnagy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120630</guid>
		<description>thanks dude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120628</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/02/will-al-pacino-be-bond-villain#comment-120628</guid>
		<description>Pacino, no &#039;h&#039;

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000199/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pacino, no &#8216;h&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000199/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000199/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
