Comments on: Pathology Party Pics

By: Jen

Jen — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:31:48 +0000

We were invited by the guys from Divide Pictures. I was wearing a pink blouse, black jacket, black slacks, and blueish/purple shoes.

Here’s a pic:

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y129/jenthefangirl/MiloJen.jpg

Ann’s in the beige dress. We’re with other invites of Divide.

By: John

John — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 04:15:29 +0000

Hey Ann and Jen,

Who were you guys there with? What were you wearing? I’m sure we must have bumped into each other

By: Jen

Jen — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:27:40 +0000

Woot! Glad to see you here, Ann! :D That was one smashing time. We gotta go all out on April 18th. Big group together would rock so hard.

By: Ann AURA {DSC}

Ann AURA {DSC} — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:17:20 +0000

Hey John!

I was at that screening too! Boy was it fun! I specially enjoyed the open bar and free pizza :) The movie was amazing and I am looking forward to sharing my thoughts on it as well. Too bad we didn’t get to meet.

Take care,
Ann AURA {DSC}

By: Jen

Jen — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:59:14 +0000

Great shots and I love your report. I was also there. My first screening and afterparty and both were truly amazing. I was blown away by the movie. I expected more sex, more gore, but what I got was more substance than I had previously thought would be in the movie. It was very refreshing. Now I really, really want to help Neveldine and Taylor get it a wide release like it deserves.

By: John

John — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:44:47 +0000

Hey Omar,

If you don’t understand the differences between “blogging” and “reporting”, then I’m not sure how to help you.

Also, I have hung out a LOT more with Ken Davitian (Azamat from the Borat movie), and yet we hammered his latest movie.

But I go back once again to what I said earlier:

“I never give anything but my honest, open and untainted opinion. Period. For you to suggest otherwise (without any facts or logic) is nothing but pure, unsubstantiated speculation on your part. But like I said, you’re free to engage in that all you wish.”

By: Omar

Omar — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:41:10 +0000

Comparing an unremarkable background extra part to hanging out with and throwing a party for a group of filmmakers for a certain movie is stupid and you know it. Who’s the one stretching here?

It doesn’t dismantle my theory at all, seeing how he got more and more involved with the persons connected to the project after he saw that film footage. And all this trumpeting over 20 minutes of footage? It better be a fucking AMAZING movie if all this championing is going to make any sense.

But since this is going nowhere lets agree to disagree.

By: Servant of Krom

Servant of Krom — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:35:05 +0000

@OMAR

While I detest the juvenile phrase, yes you did get “pwnd”.

You seem to repeatedly ignore the most important thing that was brought up: campea has been trumpeting this movie before he started hanging out with the creators. That fact alone dismantles your entire theory.

On top of that, if you don’t think Jeffery Llyons or Ebert or Malten know a few celebrities or have a few acotr/producer/director friends then you’re crazy. It is possible to know people, and be objective.

If campea can be objective and give negative reviews to movies he actually got extra parts in, then I have no doubt and no problem in believing he can be objective in giving his honest opinion on a movie made by some guys he’s had drinks with a couple of times. Looks to me like you’re trying to stretch things here.

By: Omar

Omar — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:18:20 +0000

I didn’t get pwned, he’s just repeating the same stuff he said a couple of posts up.
And you do have something to lose if you post a negative review, those new friends.
The last time I checked, articles about Shia Lebeuff caught smoking or new pictures of Snake Eyes (which were fucking awesome by the way) constituted as news, movie news (some more so than others). To suggest otherwise is just silly. So this is a movie NEWS site. Scribbling a couple of lines at the end of each news does not make it anything else. And didn’t you “report” what went on on those sets? And wasn’t that the reason that you were invited in the first place? That would make you a reporter. Studios don’t just invite anybody to a set just because they write about themselves on a blog.
Look I’m not trying to be a dick or suggesting that the film sucks, I don’t know I haven’t seen it, but I do hope that you see what I’m trying to point out here (and so have others before me).

If Brad Pitt reviewed an Angelina Jolie film, would you take it seriously?

By: Doug

Doug — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:54:13 +0000

Just jumping in on the jealousy bandwagon. Glad you had a great time. Wish I was there. I would have loved to meet your new friends :)