<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosemary&#8217;s Baby Remake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-190092</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-190092</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rosemary&#039;s Baby&quot; as a remake?!  That movie is one of the most perfectly made films anyone attempting a remake is like trying to rewrite the Gospels.  When I am in the mood for just the pure pleasure of watching a film that is flawless, I put &quot;Rosemary&quot; in the machine and think Mr. Polanski is a Film-God, never mind his personal young girl issue.  If you look at that particular situation, the girl involved still doesn&#039;t understand why Mr. Polanski has been villified like the baby Rosemary rocked in the black cradle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rosemary&#8217;s Baby&#8221; as a remake?!  That movie is one of the most perfectly made films anyone attempting a remake is like trying to rewrite the Gospels.  When I am in the mood for just the pure pleasure of watching a film that is flawless, I put &#8220;Rosemary&#8221; in the machine and think Mr. Polanski is a Film-God, never mind his personal young girl issue.  If you look at that particular situation, the girl involved still doesn&#8217;t understand why Mr. Polanski has been villified like the baby Rosemary rocked in the black cradle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfsilver</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124339</link>
		<dc:creator>sfsilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124339</guid>
		<description>I have nothing against remakes.  Remakes are as old as the film industry itself - by the 30&#039;s the industry was already repeating itself.  Some have even won Oscars (the Departed).  It all comes down to the talents involved.  As such there is little hope for excellence here.  These people have a track record of destroying anything that was good about the source material and reducing it to the worst cliches of the genres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing against remakes.  Remakes are as old as the film industry itself &#8211; by the 30&#8217;s the industry was already repeating itself.  Some have even won Oscars (the Departed).  It all comes down to the talents involved.  As such there is little hope for excellence here.  These people have a track record of destroying anything that was good about the source material and reducing it to the worst cliches of the genres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkKinger</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124225</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkKinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 02:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124225</guid>
		<description>I am on the fence with this. It is not going to be one of these films I will be looking forward to see remade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am on the fence with this. It is not going to be one of these films I will be looking forward to see remade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124197</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124197</guid>
		<description>Remaking Hitchcock is a hard thing. Comparisons are inevitable, and more often than not, met with poor results. Recall the made for cable &quot;sequel&quot; to The Birds? (Birds II Lands End) and how that was trashed (rightfully so)? How about Gus Van Sant&#039;s misstep with remaking Psycho?

Some things need to be left alone. 

The same can be said about Polanski&#039;s film. It&#039;s already one strike against you. Want to hear strike number two? Here it is:

Rosemary&#039;s Baby is a horror-thriller classic because it is set more on a psychological level. This is also accomplished in the composition of the production design and the cinematography. One famous scene even &quot;made&quot; audiences &quot;look&quot; around a corner, gaining thier interest. Micheal Bay and his cronies couldn&#039;t liteally sit still for something like that.

Also, a remake such as Rosemary&#039;s has to address the times. If it is just made because of name value, which it most likely is, that it will be of little substance. A key thing to know is if they (Dunes) are looking more to the Polanski film or a new adaptation of the Ira Levin novel. If the latter, it may be the best case scenerio, but...why not decide instead of &#039;remakes&#039; go for another kind of built in audience?

I&#039;m thinkin&#039; Brian Lumley&#039;s Nercroscope, or Anne Rice&#039;s The Mummy, or an F Paul Wilson Repairman Jack novel? See what I mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remaking Hitchcock is a hard thing. Comparisons are inevitable, and more often than not, met with poor results. Recall the made for cable &#8220;sequel&#8221; to The Birds? (Birds II Lands End) and how that was trashed (rightfully so)? How about Gus Van Sant&#8217;s misstep with remaking Psycho?</p>
<p>Some things need to be left alone. </p>
<p>The same can be said about Polanski&#8217;s film. It&#8217;s already one strike against you. Want to hear strike number two? Here it is:</p>
<p>Rosemary&#8217;s Baby is a horror-thriller classic because it is set more on a psychological level. This is also accomplished in the composition of the production design and the cinematography. One famous scene even &#8220;made&#8221; audiences &#8220;look&#8221; around a corner, gaining thier interest. Micheal Bay and his cronies couldn&#8217;t liteally sit still for something like that.</p>
<p>Also, a remake such as Rosemary&#8217;s has to address the times. If it is just made because of name value, which it most likely is, that it will be of little substance. A key thing to know is if they (Dunes) are looking more to the Polanski film or a new adaptation of the Ira Levin novel. If the latter, it may be the best case scenerio, but&#8230;why not decide instead of &#8216;remakes&#8217; go for another kind of built in audience?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinkin&#8217; Brian Lumley&#8217;s Nercroscope, or Anne Rice&#8217;s The Mummy, or an F Paul Wilson Repairman Jack novel? See what I mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Death</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124126</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Death</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/03/rosemarys-baby-remake#comment-124126</guid>
		<description>If they try to update Hitchcock I&#039;ll kill them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they try to update Hitchcock I&#8217;ll kill them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
