Comments on: Two Final IronMan Posters Revealed

By: Vek

Vek — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:10:41 +0000

Star Wars? More James Bond vibe for me. But I really like both. I don’t understand the bitching. These posters would look great on the wall.

By: Slushie Man

Slushie Man — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:07:51 +0000

They look like James Bond posters. I dig them.

By: Sir Jig-A-Lot

Sir Jig-A-Lot — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:31:59 +0000

very original triloy star wars-ish. in a bad way.

By: leeloo

leeloo — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:52:52 +0000

2nd one is better but both are pretty generic. i hope the story isnt.

By: ALFREDO

ALFREDO — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:49:47 +0000

These posters look great I don’t get why people are bitch’n. The teaser posters I think are boring.

By: Mozzerino

Mozzerino — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:56:34 +0000

I love it, the posters have a bit of a STAR WARS-vibe going.
I can’t believe we still have to wait more than two months for this flick. I wanna see it now!

By: Darren J Seeley

Darren J Seeley — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:50:21 +0000

I don’t know what everyone is crapping bricks about. They look great. Especially #2. It has a lot more balance than the first.

*************

“I dont need to see EVERYONE you paid to be in the film to be on the poster. They will get enough screen time, trust me. This just looks busy and takes away from the damned suit”

Well, that, Rod, cannot be helped. More than likely it is a contractual thing.

*********

@Kristina

I know what you mean. One of my favorite films from the 80’s is ‘Streets Of Fire’. I got the DVD with the original artwork…about a year or so later, Universal did a re-issue with no additional stuff. Just something to re-market it. The new cover ditched the Posterized Sumi-E like art in favor of photoshop cutouts.

I remeber the art deco Rocketeer poster…when that film hit video, that art deco brillance was trashed. Don’t ask me why. I do not know. I remember MGM-Pathe and the original one sheet of Quigley Down Under. Great us of airbrushed art…when it hit video, just a photo of Tom Selleck and nothing else.

Why the powers in play bring on graphic designers and either tell them to do such stuff (“they” are the “client”. You go by what the client wants) is beyond comprehension. But what I can say is that the int’l friends are off thier rockers.

By: JAMIE

JAMIE — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:39:15 +0000

yo if they make the floating head thing in like..justice league..or the avengers then yeah but not in a movie with one awsome dude like ironman or the hulk cuz then that means u gotta put his scuba instructor and nanny and shit and we dotn want that…so yah

By: JAMIE

JAMIE — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:37:17 +0000

i agree with the star wars thing- ALTHOUHG DUDE in starwars there were like 1000 awsome characters that u could put up floating..in here its just ironman- so that makes like 7 regular boring people floating..thats ONE of the reasons y it sucks…then theres the fact that it looks cheap as fuck

By: JAMIE

JAMIE — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:34:25 +0000

no dude…
it loks like one of those “transmorfers” type of movie poster..like cheap it looks horrible. the movie will be amazing but the posters are awfull
like..
the 1st one that just showed half of ironmans head was radical tho but these suck- it just looks wack
the movies gonna make me moist tho- the posters are the 1s that suck the meat