 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constructicons In Transformers 2?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:41:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shockquake</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129332</link>
		<dc:creator>shockquake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129332</guid>
		<description>If Bay want to pay homage to G1 then he will have 6 Constructicons and not 5.  Besides, it wouldn&#039;t be the Constructicions with 5 robots just like it wouldn&#039;t be the Dinobots without Grimlock.  

Bay really messes up on the 1st movie having one of the character name Bonecrusher.  I guess he wasn&#039;t thinking about having the Constructicons in the 2nd movie.  I am very curious as to how he will replace Bonecrusher in the Constructicons and if he will call it Devastator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bay want to pay homage to G1 then he will have 6 Constructicons and not 5.  Besides, it wouldn&#8217;t be the Constructicions with 5 robots just like it wouldn&#8217;t be the Dinobots without Grimlock.  </p>
<p>Bay really messes up on the 1st movie having one of the character name Bonecrusher.  I guess he wasn&#8217;t thinking about having the Constructicons in the 2nd movie.  I am very curious as to how he will replace Bonecrusher in the Constructicons and if he will call it Devastator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAMIE</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129324</link>
		<dc:creator>JAMIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129324</guid>
		<description>@ Ezell 

dude devastator was around before megazor 

you know what? i think that power rangers wouldnt be such a bad movie if they make it not-gay
like make it with kickass robots and cool power ranger outfits- oh yeah and get rid of the pink power ranger
be like blue green yelow black white and red
that would be so kickass if they make it without the homoness that plagued the original show

thats a great idea guys.....just remember to follow the WWJD

What Would Jamie Do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ezell </p>
<p>dude devastator was around before megazor </p>
<p>you know what? i think that power rangers wouldnt be such a bad movie if they make it not-gay<br />
like make it with kickass robots and cool power ranger outfits- oh yeah and get rid of the pink power ranger<br />
be like blue green yelow black white and red<br />
that would be so kickass if they make it without the homoness that plagued the original show</p>
<p>thats a great idea guys&#8230;..just remember to follow the WWJD</p>
<p>What Would Jamie Do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAMIE</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129313</link>
		<dc:creator>JAMIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129313</guid>
		<description>bay will make grapple a constructicon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bay will make grapple a constructicon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAMIE</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129312</link>
		<dc:creator>JAMIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129312</guid>
		<description>hey!! guys!!!!
i know bay is going to fuck it up somehow- lik not really fuck up but like fuck up so that only people that watched the show or read the comics will be able to tell!!!! 
like i bet that one of the decepticons that make up devastator will be like... grapple
hehe...aaahh i see it now. and also hell name devastator brawl watch if he does im the one that called it I CALLED IT IT WAS ME!!!!!!

but he will watch hell make some stupid mistake like that and ill remind you all of this little comment.

the jamie was here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey!! guys!!!!<br />
i know bay is going to fuck it up somehow- lik not really fuck up but like fuck up so that only people that watched the show or read the comics will be able to tell!!!!<br />
like i bet that one of the decepticons that make up devastator will be like&#8230; grapple<br />
hehe&#8230;aaahh i see it now. and also hell name devastator brawl watch if he does im the one that called it I CALLED IT IT WAS ME!!!!!!</p>
<p>but he will watch hell make some stupid mistake like that and ill remind you all of this little comment.</p>
<p>the jamie was here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAMIE</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129311</link>
		<dc:creator>JAMIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129311</guid>
		<description>@ krystina moe john karl fisher- hell everyone!

lol you guys ratchet heals him afterwards but they dont SHOW it. just like they didnt show them fixing barricade after the beat down he had against BB. remember how fucked up barricade was? he looked worse then BB did. and he got right back up and the decepticons had no medics at their disposal. and they didnt have the allspark either or else..well you know...the movie would have been over. and ratchet sayd he was still working on him im guessing bumblebee rebooted hiomself sometime during the last fight. 

and really john?? wratchet? i thought it was ratchet
 not like the video game fox lokin dude but i thought it was a coinsidence....hhmm wratchet (doesnt really matter...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ krystina moe john karl fisher- hell everyone!</p>
<p>lol you guys ratchet heals him afterwards but they dont SHOW it. just like they didnt show them fixing barricade after the beat down he had against BB. remember how fucked up barricade was? he looked worse then BB did. and he got right back up and the decepticons had no medics at their disposal. and they didnt have the allspark either or else..well you know&#8230;the movie would have been over. and ratchet sayd he was still working on him im guessing bumblebee rebooted hiomself sometime during the last fight. </p>
<p>and really john?? wratchet? i thought it was ratchet<br />
 not like the video game fox lokin dude but i thought it was a coinsidence&#8230;.hhmm wratchet (doesnt really matter&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129296</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129296</guid>
		<description>It was unclear in the movie.  You see Ratchet shoot that red beam at him during the Autobot intro scene, but BB doesn&#039;t speak until the very end.  Everyone in the theater was like, &quot;WTF?  He talks?  How?&quot;  I guess the beam healed him, but it&#039;s unclear as to whether the beam healed him right away and he had no reason to talk(which is bullshit.  He would have been yelling &quot;GET THE FUCK OFF ME!&quot; when he was being captured), whether the beam healed him progressively over the course of the movie, or whether it was the Allspark that healed him.  If it was the Allspark, why didn&#039;t it fix his legs up after they got blown the fuck off?  Remember, BB hands Sam the Allspark after he loses his legs, so why doesn&#039;t the cube shoot out magic beams and heal him right then and there the way that it healed that useless ass Frenzy at the Hoover Dam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was unclear in the movie.  You see Ratchet shoot that red beam at him during the Autobot intro scene, but BB doesn&#8217;t speak until the very end.  Everyone in the theater was like, &#8220;WTF?  He talks?  How?&#8221;  I guess the beam healed him, but it&#8217;s unclear as to whether the beam healed him right away and he had no reason to talk(which is bullshit.  He would have been yelling &#8220;GET THE FUCK OFF ME!&#8221; when he was being captured), whether the beam healed him progressively over the course of the movie, or whether it was the Allspark that healed him.  If it was the Allspark, why didn&#8217;t it fix his legs up after they got blown the fuck off?  Remember, BB hands Sam the Allspark after he loses his legs, so why doesn&#8217;t the cube shoot out magic beams and heal him right then and there the way that it healed that useless ass Frenzy at the Hoover Dam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129293</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129293</guid>
		<description>Hey John...

Really? I must have missed that in the film - or maybe it was implied?

Thanks for clearing that up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John&#8230;</p>
<p>Really? I must have missed that in the film &#8211; or maybe it was implied?</p>
<p>Thanks for clearing that up :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129288</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129288</guid>
		<description>Hey Moe,

Wratchet repaired Bumblebee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Moe,</p>
<p>Wratchet repaired Bumblebee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129285</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129285</guid>
		<description>To Karl Fisher: 

Regarding your question about which Constructicon controlled Devastator; they all did. Devastator could only perform functions which all six members agreed on.

If Bay does add the Constructicons into Transformers 2, he&#039;ll either have to replace Bonecrusher with another character, or just use the other 5 (Scrapper, Scavenger, Long Haul, Hook &amp; Mixmaster) on their own.

I also know that there&#039;s a debate on whether or not the remaining piece of the All Spark was destroyed or not. It wasn&#039;t, because the very last shot of the movie has Shia &amp; Megan Fox lying atop a repaired Bumblebee. Transformers don&#039;t scan things to give them a body, they scan things that fit the size/shape of their bodies. Therefore, Bumblebee couldn&#039;t just scan another Camaro, because his damaged body without legs couldn&#039;t handle the design. It makes sense (to me) that the last piece of the All Spark was able to repair Bumblebee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Karl Fisher: </p>
<p>Regarding your question about which Constructicon controlled Devastator; they all did. Devastator could only perform functions which all six members agreed on.</p>
<p>If Bay does add the Constructicons into Transformers 2, he&#8217;ll either have to replace Bonecrusher with another character, or just use the other 5 (Scrapper, Scavenger, Long Haul, Hook &amp; Mixmaster) on their own.</p>
<p>I also know that there&#8217;s a debate on whether or not the remaining piece of the All Spark was destroyed or not. It wasn&#8217;t, because the very last shot of the movie has Shia &amp; Megan Fox lying atop a repaired Bumblebee. Transformers don&#8217;t scan things to give them a body, they scan things that fit the size/shape of their bodies. Therefore, Bumblebee couldn&#8217;t just scan another Camaro, because his damaged body without legs couldn&#8217;t handle the design. It makes sense (to me) that the last piece of the All Spark was able to repair Bumblebee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezell</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 05:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/constructicons-in-transformers-2#comment-129244</guid>
		<description>I like Transformers but the idea of having all the bad guys sound like power rangers except evil not what i want to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Transformers but the idea of having all the bad guys sound like power rangers except evil not what i want to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
