 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek 11 has a LOT going for it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:21:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130947</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130947</guid>
		<description>NBAKid, the role Nimoy would play in this is a much older post-Generations Spock that is revisiting his first meeting with Shatner&#039;s Kirk.

If they had a scene with Kirk and Spock sitting around talking about their Academy days leading to a flashback, it would be ignoring the events of Generations.

For the record, I predicted the TimeTravelling to a previous point to reboot the story.  If the above spoiler is true, I want it known that this was my idea long before they wrote the script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBAKid, the role Nimoy would play in this is a much older post-Generations Spock that is revisiting his first meeting with Shatner&#8217;s Kirk.</p>
<p>If they had a scene with Kirk and Spock sitting around talking about their Academy days leading to a flashback, it would be ignoring the events of Generations.</p>
<p>For the record, I predicted the TimeTravelling to a previous point to reboot the story.  If the above spoiler is true, I want it known that this was my idea long before they wrote the script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbakid2000</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130882</link>
		<dc:creator>nbakid2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130882</guid>
		<description>Wait wait wait wait. If they&#039;re &quot;re-inventing&quot; the series, then why does it have to follow canon? Why WOULDN&#039;T Shatner be alive? 

Someone clue me in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait wait wait wait. If they&#8217;re &#8220;re-inventing&#8221; the series, then why does it have to follow canon? Why WOULDN&#8217;T Shatner be alive? </p>
<p>Someone clue me in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScreenRant.com</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130875</link>
		<dc:creator>ScreenRant.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130875</guid>
		<description>&quot;The PG-13 rating means we wont see brutal violence and blood, and likely no sex. But hardcore Trekkies don’t know what sex is anyways.&quot;

LMAO... thanks for the chuckle, Rodney. :-)

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The PG-13 rating means we wont see brutal violence and blood, and likely no sex. But hardcore Trekkies don’t know what sex is anyways.&#8221;</p>
<p>LMAO&#8230; thanks for the chuckle, Rodney. :-)</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1138</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130871</link>
		<dc:creator>1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really quite why there is such an aversion to a reboot of the series. The canon of Star Trek has been so messed up for awhile that a total reboot would do the series well...it&#039;s a clean slate, a fresh start and Star Trek needed it it quite badly.

I&#039;ve been a fan for a long time and will always love the TOS. I grew up on re-runs a and to me that is the quineesential Trek. However I did enjoy Generations and some of Deep space, Voyager and Enterprise. But each new incarnation seemed to distort and pervert history making the time-line of Trek a complete mess.

I&#039;m a Trekkie and always will be. But I was really hoping for a complete reboot. The death of kirk, the inconsistencies of the time-line and the sometimes awful writing that came with all the series, just begged a new beginning.

It&#039;s a shame that no one really had the guts to start fresh. I think reboots did well for BSG and Batman and could really see the same for Star Trek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really quite why there is such an aversion to a reboot of the series. The canon of Star Trek has been so messed up for awhile that a total reboot would do the series well&#8230;it&#8217;s a clean slate, a fresh start and Star Trek needed it it quite badly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a fan for a long time and will always love the TOS. I grew up on re-runs a and to me that is the quineesential Trek. However I did enjoy Generations and some of Deep space, Voyager and Enterprise. But each new incarnation seemed to distort and pervert history making the time-line of Trek a complete mess.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Trekkie and always will be. But I was really hoping for a complete reboot. The death of kirk, the inconsistencies of the time-line and the sometimes awful writing that came with all the series, just begged a new beginning.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that no one really had the guts to start fresh. I think reboots did well for BSG and Batman and could really see the same for Star Trek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T Chattaway</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130843</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T Chattaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130843</guid>
		<description>At least two other films feature the word &quot;shit&quot; or variations thereof:

In Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986), a woman asks Kirk if he is &quot;trying to teach whales to retrieve torpedoes or some dipshit stuff like that&quot; and Kirk replies, &quot;No ma&#039;am, no dipshit.&quot;

And in Star Trek: First Contact (1996), Picard and Data are attacked by a woman who thinks that they are the enemy, and when they try to assure her that they mean her no harm, she yells &quot;Bullshit!&quot;

Interestingly, both of these films are time-travel stories -- in one, the word is introduced by a 20th-century woman, while in the other, it is used by a 21st-century woman -- and in at least one of those films, the point is made that these &quot;colourful metaphors&quot; belong to the past and are not used in Kirk&#039;s day (the 23rd century), at least.

But the fact that Data uses the word in his own era -- the 24th century -- suggests that the word might have made a comeback by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least two other films feature the word &#8220;shit&#8221; or variations thereof:</p>
<p>In Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986), a woman asks Kirk if he is &#8220;trying to teach whales to retrieve torpedoes or some dipshit stuff like that&#8221; and Kirk replies, &#8220;No ma&#8217;am, no dipshit.&#8221;</p>
<p>And in Star Trek: First Contact (1996), Picard and Data are attacked by a woman who thinks that they are the enemy, and when they try to assure her that they mean her no harm, she yells &#8220;Bullshit!&#8221;</p>
<p>Interestingly, both of these films are time-travel stories &#8212; in one, the word is introduced by a 20th-century woman, while in the other, it is used by a 21st-century woman &#8212; and in at least one of those films, the point is made that these &#8220;colourful metaphors&#8221; belong to the past and are not used in Kirk&#8217;s day (the 23rd century), at least.</p>
<p>But the fact that Data uses the word in his own era &#8212; the 24th century &#8212; suggests that the word might have made a comeback by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain J.T. Kirk</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130837</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain J.T. Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130837</guid>
		<description>Spoiler info. on Star Trek 11......Spock travels back through time to meet the original crew and change a catastrophic event. Expect a fond moment between Captain Kirk and The spock from the future because as we all know Kirk died in Generations so there will be a line in the movie about how good it is for Spock to see him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoiler info. on Star Trek 11&#8230;&#8230;Spock travels back through time to meet the original crew and change a catastrophic event. Expect a fond moment between Captain Kirk and The spock from the future because as we all know Kirk died in Generations so there will be a line in the movie about how good it is for Spock to see him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonSalon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130836</link>
		<dc:creator>RonSalon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/04/star-trek-11-has-a-lot-going-for-it#comment-130836</guid>
		<description>Star Trek does have a lot going for it and I for one can&#039;t wait for the new movie. I am a huge fan of the series -- ever since I was a kid, long before Star Wars. Although as I write this I am watching Episode I. LOL!

I&#039;m glad TPTB went with new a director and the like; not to mention the great casting. I hope the writers come through because a solid story is going to save Trek along with good performances. If it it&#039;s crap, the actors and JJ will not outlive it.,. Of that you can be sure. Trekkies would unite in their hatred and besides, no one really likes a pissed off Klingon, It seems like Star Trek XI has the potential to be awesome...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek does have a lot going for it and I for one can&#8217;t wait for the new movie. I am a huge fan of the series &#8212; ever since I was a kid, long before Star Wars. Although as I write this I am watching Episode I. LOL!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad TPTB went with new a director and the like; not to mention the great casting. I hope the writers come through because a solid story is going to save Trek along with good performances. If it it&#8217;s crap, the actors and JJ will not outlive it.,. Of that you can be sure. Trekkies would unite in their hatred and besides, no one really likes a pissed off Klingon, It seems like Star Trek XI has the potential to be awesome&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
