Comments on: There May Not Be A Cloverfield 2 http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2 The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:03:45 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: NYCKING87 http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136939 NYCKING87 Sun, 18 May 2008 15:32:51 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136939 I most definitly think a sequel to Cloverfield can be done. Either make the sequel with another shaky cam or shoot from the perspective of the characters like you would a regular movie without shaky cam. Or it could be from the perspective of the military. I really liked the film and own it on dvd. I liked the young cast actually and the film wouldn't have been what it was without Hud. I most definitly think a sequel to Cloverfield can be done. Either make the sequel with another shaky cam or shoot from the perspective of the characters like you would a regular movie without shaky cam. Or it could be from the perspective of the military.

I really liked the film and own it on dvd. I liked the young cast actually and the film wouldn’t have been what it was without Hud.

]]> By: Mozzerino http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136928 Mozzerino Sun, 18 May 2008 13:45:30 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136928 I'm quite torn about this. I really dug CLOVERFIELD, it was an entertaining, tightly packed action chase-movie, that did things "a little bit different". That of course was it's main selling point and there's not really a way to replicate it. The handy-cam style won't interest audiences a second time. What to do in a sequel? Explain the event? Boring. Another city and another monster? Yawn. It's like BLAIR WITCH PROJECT, those sequels were crap as well and how couldn't they be? You know what I would want to see: Changes perspectives once again. Do a whole movie from the perspective of the monster. I'm not really sure that could work, maybe the concept is just a bit too out there, but it's definitely something we haven't seen before. I’m quite torn about this.
I really dug CLOVERFIELD, it was an entertaining, tightly packed action chase-movie, that did things “a little bit different”. That of course was it’s main selling point and there’s not really a way to replicate it. The handy-cam style won’t interest audiences a second time.
What to do in a sequel?
Explain the event? Boring.
Another city and another monster? Yawn.
It’s like BLAIR WITCH PROJECT, those sequels were crap as well and how couldn’t they be?

You know what I would want to see: Changes perspectives once again. Do a whole movie from the perspective of the monster. I’m not really sure that could work, maybe the concept is just a bit too out there, but it’s definitely something we haven’t seen before.

]]> By: HisDivineShadow http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136865 HisDivineShadow Sun, 18 May 2008 04:42:49 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136865 Cloverfield made over 200 mil worldwide on a 30mil budget, there will be a sequel.. (Beleve it or not) From sources deep within my grasp, I've heard that there will be a sequel and that it will involve another "creature" dropping by another coastal city. More than likly L.A. (There will be a key clue in the film that will link the two films). Not to mention give us the idea that possibly the events in both films are happening at the same time. It will center on, a local news crew or a first response military division. The story is still being considered and developed but this is the direction that I've heard Abhrams wants to go. It will prob have another military codeword for a title, so it won't be titled Cloverfield 2. Cloverfield made over 200 mil worldwide on a 30mil budget, there will be a sequel..

(Beleve it or not)

From sources deep within my grasp, I’ve heard that there will be a sequel and that it will involve another “creature” dropping by another coastal city.
More than likly L.A.
(There will be a key clue in the film that will link the two films). Not to mention give us the idea that possibly the events in both films are happening at the same time.

It will center on, a local news crew or a first response military division.

The story is still being considered and developed but this is the direction that I’ve heard Abhrams wants to go.

It will prob have another military codeword for a title, so it won’t be titled Cloverfield 2.

]]> By: Craig http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136852 Craig Sun, 18 May 2008 03:37:21 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136852 Does anyone else feel like this is just baiting us in so when they begin to shoot, viral market another film, we don't think cloverfield two? Does anyone else feel like this is just baiting us in so when they begin to shoot, viral market another film, we don’t think cloverfield two?

]]> By: Bruce http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136831 Bruce Sat, 17 May 2008 23:13:39 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136831 colverfiled takes the fun out of mnster moves. colverfiled takes the fun out of mnster moves.

]]> By: Brandon Daviet http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136830 Brandon Daviet Sat, 17 May 2008 23:10:47 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136830 The movie was really only good for one watch I agree. However I think a updated, godzilla type monster movie, maybe with a enviromental angle and strong cast, with Cloverfield could be a big hit. The movie was really only good for one watch I agree. However I think a updated, godzilla type monster movie, maybe with a enviromental angle and strong cast, with Cloverfield could be a big hit.

]]> By: Bruce http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136818 Bruce Sat, 17 May 2008 21:29:29 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136818 good! good!

]]> By: Dalamar http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136816 Dalamar Sat, 17 May 2008 21:13:25 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136816 What is stupid movie...Besides the annoying shaky camera they never explained the complete origin of the monster. Complete drivel... What is stupid movie…Besides the annoying shaky camera they never explained the complete origin of the monster. Complete drivel…

]]> By: Dragonslayer http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136808 Dragonslayer Sat, 17 May 2008 20:14:42 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136808 Damn. I liked Cloverfield. Damn. I liked Cloverfield.

]]> By: Dragonslayer http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-may-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136807 Dragonslayer Sat, 17 May 2008 20:14:06 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/there-my-not-be-a-cloverfield-2#comment-136807 (Type your comment here. Make sure you've read the commenting rules before doing so) (Type your comment here. Make sure you’ve read the commenting rules before doing so)

]]>