 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why DC Can&#8217;t do what Marvel Does</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:02:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-148611</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-148611</guid>
		<description>Fact: What you just said is opinion.  Not fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact: What you just said is opinion.  Not fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H-B</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-148604</link>
		<dc:creator>H-B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-148604</guid>
		<description>Fact: DC sucks, escecially when compared to Marvel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact: DC sucks, escecially when compared to Marvel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-144812</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-144812</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if WB created a DC Films studio, To me WB is losing alot or money they could be making but they seem to be sitting and watching the Marvel movies like the rest of us. What WB needs to do is wake up and see that superhero movies are whats in now and if they don&#039;t well Marvel is just going to continue to rack up on their movies because they have no intention on slowing down. I mean its ridiculous you have to wait years for a DC movie and the only movies they continue to put out is just Batman and Superman movies. They could have beat Marvel to the punch with the Justice League movie but I guess they are going to sit back and watch Marvel bring their live action team up movie first and make more millions. But I love Marvel anyways so I can watch their movies all the time but WB is very disappointing in how they are managing DC and the movies. It would be nice to have some more movies out but I guess for now Marvel will have to satisfy all our superhero needs on the big screen with an occasional DC Batman or Superman movie here and there. WB Wake up!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if WB created a DC Films studio, To me WB is losing alot or money they could be making but they seem to be sitting and watching the Marvel movies like the rest of us. What WB needs to do is wake up and see that superhero movies are whats in now and if they don&#8217;t well Marvel is just going to continue to rack up on their movies because they have no intention on slowing down. I mean its ridiculous you have to wait years for a DC movie and the only movies they continue to put out is just Batman and Superman movies. They could have beat Marvel to the punch with the Justice League movie but I guess they are going to sit back and watch Marvel bring their live action team up movie first and make more millions. But I love Marvel anyways so I can watch their movies all the time but WB is very disappointing in how they are managing DC and the movies. It would be nice to have some more movies out but I guess for now Marvel will have to satisfy all our superhero needs on the big screen with an occasional DC Batman or Superman movie here and there. WB Wake up!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orren Jensen</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-137587</link>
		<dc:creator>Orren Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-137587</guid>
		<description>DC Comic has two characters that have produced money and that are Batman and Superman, two of the most popular superheroes of all time. If some one asked you to list the top five superheroes one if not both would be on the list. D.C. has capitalized on this concept and has made two of the biggest franchise that started in the eighties and still rains today. Besides the Frank Miller version of Batman D.C comic book movies are about dead. I mean they will still make money but Marvel is what is hot today. I believe that Superman Returns only did well because Bryan Singer left a little Marvel series call X-men. Which I am still piss that he made the move before finishing the X-men trilogy. I also thing that Marvel characters have more of a humanistic characteristics than D.C. Iron Man is a walking dead man that has a heart to save others. Spiderman is a looser in a superhero suit. Hulk is a doctor with a “dieses” that he can’t control.  Fantastic Four is a dysfunctional family.  The list goes on and all D.C. has to offer shiny superheros that have way too many power aka Superman.  The only superheroes I like from D.C. are the vendettas like Batman, Green Arrow, and V.  So until D.C. can conjure up a humanistic story with one of the classic heroes like Superman or Batman Marvel will be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC Comic has two characters that have produced money and that are Batman and Superman, two of the most popular superheroes of all time. If some one asked you to list the top five superheroes one if not both would be on the list. D.C. has capitalized on this concept and has made two of the biggest franchise that started in the eighties and still rains today. Besides the Frank Miller version of Batman D.C comic book movies are about dead. I mean they will still make money but Marvel is what is hot today. I believe that Superman Returns only did well because Bryan Singer left a little Marvel series call X-men. Which I am still piss that he made the move before finishing the X-men trilogy. I also thing that Marvel characters have more of a humanistic characteristics than D.C. Iron Man is a walking dead man that has a heart to save others. Spiderman is a looser in a superhero suit. Hulk is a doctor with a “dieses” that he can’t control.  Fantastic Four is a dysfunctional family.  The list goes on and all D.C. has to offer shiny superheros that have way too many power aka Superman.  The only superheroes I like from D.C. are the vendettas like Batman, Green Arrow, and V.  So until D.C. can conjure up a humanistic story with one of the classic heroes like Superman or Batman Marvel will be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAZMAT</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136774</link>
		<dc:creator>HAZMAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136774</guid>
		<description>Rodney 
oohh okay i see
yeah but then it would STILL be christian bale and brandon routh, and they sayd thay wont be in the jla film so will this move change that?
even if it does- when will they do this? 

the thing that confuses me is- why dont they make bale and routh batman and superman in jla? its what the fans want. and if they dont, then they should use the same actors they used for al the other individual films (like flash) and replace routh and bale with GREAT actors in the jla film.

im hoping this will happen but its too good to happen and for me to believe in

thanx for clearing that up btw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodney<br />
oohh okay i see<br />
yeah but then it would STILL be christian bale and brandon routh, and they sayd thay wont be in the jla film so will this move change that?<br />
even if it does- when will they do this? </p>
<p>the thing that confuses me is- why dont they make bale and routh batman and superman in jla? its what the fans want. and if they dont, then they should use the same actors they used for al the other individual films (like flash) and replace routh and bale with GREAT actors in the jla film.</p>
<p>im hoping this will happen but its too good to happen and for me to believe in</p>
<p>thanx for clearing that up btw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136743</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136743</guid>
		<description>I think that would be a fantastic idea. If DC people had control over creating good, solid films about DC characters, I&#039;m sure they could be successful. Some may not (...lets not forget Fantastic Four), but it would seem that Marvel Studios has got the formula right with Iron Man, and evidently with Hulk. So having their own studio seems to be working great for Marvel.

Another benefit of the DC Studios would be not only seeing big name superheroes like WW, Flash and Green Lantern, but also many of the fantastic Vertigo stories as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that would be a fantastic idea. If DC people had control over creating good, solid films about DC characters, I&#8217;m sure they could be successful. Some may not (&#8230;lets not forget Fantastic Four), but it would seem that Marvel Studios has got the formula right with Iron Man, and evidently with Hulk. So having their own studio seems to be working great for Marvel.</p>
<p>Another benefit of the DC Studios would be not only seeing big name superheroes like WW, Flash and Green Lantern, but also many of the fantastic Vertigo stories as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136741</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136741</guid>
		<description>First things first:

&quot; How do you make a guy who talks to fish and swims allot look bad ass&quot;  Answer: DC can&#039;t, but Marvel can. With Namor. Consider: Namor is a bad ass, and he is bared chested as opposed to Aquaman&#039;s Orange duds.

***

Okay, onto the meat n&#039; potatoes.

DC is in a bit of a crunch because WB owned them. That&#039;s hard to escape. However, I think it is idiotic of the in&#039;l friends jump on WB for dismissing big budget tags for smaller ones- specifically the sequel to Sisterhood Of The Traveling Pants &lt;strong&gt; which, by the way, was a good, inexpensive, well acted film for a chick flick and you should all kick yourselves for saying WB are idiots for having a variety of films on their roster.&lt;/strong&gt; When you folks talk about &quot;slice of the pie&quot; taken up by Sisterhood 2---I question the logic. Unless of course, you would not mind having a Flash movie for &quot;Sisterhood 2&quot;&#039;s budget.

You want it? Let&#039;s say...you get it! Then what?
&lt;em&gt; Then all the pissy hissy fanboys will question WB for not having a budget over 40 million, including distribution and marketing., that&#039;s what&lt;/em&gt; I&#039;m not defending the Sisterhood sequel nor dismissing it, but my points here are:

*the first film made some money

*it has an audience (mostly chicks, but an audience)

*the sequel has been made-with most of the returning cast three years later- with around the same production cost. (25-35 mil)

But most importantly -and this is my major beef with the int&#039;l friends- 
this film in WB&#039;s lineup has little, if anything to with, Flash, Lantern or Wonder Woman being greenlit or not. 

Let&#039;s look at Speed Racer. Yes, this film got a flat. But I can understand &quot;the attempt&quot;, and y&#039;know something? Given the track record of the talent behind it, I can see why it was Greenlit. Don&#039;t forget, folks, Speed Racer was in development hell for a little over a decade! Since Joel Silver (sorry, Rod, gotta bring this up) also was producing &quot;Speed Racer&quot; at the time Joss Whedon was on and off on Wonder Woman, the idea that a &#039;WW&#039; movie should have been made instead of Speed Racer is pure nuts. You or I can only say that in retrospect...but not in hindsight.

As for Whedon&#039;s script being rejected by WB in favor of other films (but one), int&#039;l friends....is horseshit. I may think Whedon is overpraised at times, but seeing how Whedon &lt;em&gt; himself said he had a tough time writing it to do the character justice&lt;/em&gt; - it had *zero* to do whether WB execs liked it or not. In any case, the *only* film that would have &quot;taken up the pie&quot; was the ill fated &quot;Justice League&quot;. (and again, it would NOT have effected &#039;Sisterhood&#039; or &#039;Speed Racer&#039;) 

*****
I do think it would be a good idea for DC to split off from WB with the exception of Supes and Batman. I think it would be wise to license characters for other studios, or become a &#039;studio&#039; themselves and rely on other studios for distribution. Either that, or focus more on the Vertigo line like they have done in recent times.

Like I said a few days ago in the comments section of &quot;5 leser known Comics characters&quot;....WB/DC...mark me/

&lt;strong&gt; Enemy Ace&lt;/strong&gt;.
Just...think it over. Or get Sgt. Rock rollin&#039; like we were teased the other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first:</p>
<p>&#8221; How do you make a guy who talks to fish and swims allot look bad ass&#8221;  Answer: DC can&#8217;t, but Marvel can. With Namor. Consider: Namor is a bad ass, and he is bared chested as opposed to Aquaman&#8217;s Orange duds.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Okay, onto the meat n&#8217; potatoes.</p>
<p>DC is in a bit of a crunch because WB owned them. That&#8217;s hard to escape. However, I think it is idiotic of the in&#8217;l friends jump on WB for dismissing big budget tags for smaller ones- specifically the sequel to Sisterhood Of The Traveling Pants <strong> which, by the way, was a good, inexpensive, well acted film for a chick flick and you should all kick yourselves for saying WB are idiots for having a variety of films on their roster.</strong> When you folks talk about &#8220;slice of the pie&#8221; taken up by Sisterhood 2&#8212;I question the logic. Unless of course, you would not mind having a Flash movie for &#8220;Sisterhood 2&#8243;&#8217;s budget.</p>
<p>You want it? Let&#8217;s say&#8230;you get it! Then what?<br />
<em> Then all the pissy hissy fanboys will question WB for not having a budget over 40 million, including distribution and marketing., that&#8217;s what</em> I&#8217;m not defending the Sisterhood sequel nor dismissing it, but my points here are:</p>
<p>*the first film made some money</p>
<p>*it has an audience (mostly chicks, but an audience)</p>
<p>*the sequel has been made-with most of the returning cast three years later- with around the same production cost. (25-35 mil)</p>
<p>But most importantly -and this is my major beef with the int&#8217;l friends-<br />
this film in WB&#8217;s lineup has little, if anything to with, Flash, Lantern or Wonder Woman being greenlit or not. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at Speed Racer. Yes, this film got a flat. But I can understand &#8220;the attempt&#8221;, and y&#8217;know something? Given the track record of the talent behind it, I can see why it was Greenlit. Don&#8217;t forget, folks, Speed Racer was in development hell for a little over a decade! Since Joel Silver (sorry, Rod, gotta bring this up) also was producing &#8220;Speed Racer&#8221; at the time Joss Whedon was on and off on Wonder Woman, the idea that a &#8216;WW&#8217; movie should have been made instead of Speed Racer is pure nuts. You or I can only say that in retrospect&#8230;but not in hindsight.</p>
<p>As for Whedon&#8217;s script being rejected by WB in favor of other films (but one), int&#8217;l friends&#8230;.is horseshit. I may think Whedon is overpraised at times, but seeing how Whedon <em> himself said he had a tough time writing it to do the character justice</em> &#8211; it had *zero* to do whether WB execs liked it or not. In any case, the *only* film that would have &#8220;taken up the pie&#8221; was the ill fated &#8220;Justice League&#8221;. (and again, it would NOT have effected &#8216;Sisterhood&#8217; or &#8216;Speed Racer&#8217;) </p>
<p>*****<br />
I do think it would be a good idea for DC to split off from WB with the exception of Supes and Batman. I think it would be wise to license characters for other studios, or become a &#8217;studio&#8217; themselves and rely on other studios for distribution. Either that, or focus more on the Vertigo line like they have done in recent times.</p>
<p>Like I said a few days ago in the comments section of &#8220;5 leser known Comics characters&#8221;&#8230;.WB/DC&#8230;mark me/</p>
<p><strong> Enemy Ace</strong>.<br />
Just&#8230;think it over. Or get Sgt. Rock rollin&#8217; like we were teased the other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136718</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136718</guid>
		<description>@Hazmat - You missed the point.  

DC is owned by WB.  If they created a subcompany called DC films it would not exclude them from using the same actors and properties because they would still own them.

Im not suggesting that DC separate from WB, but that WB makes an imprint company that can dedicate its time to DC films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hazmat &#8211; You missed the point.  </p>
<p>DC is owned by WB.  If they created a subcompany called DC films it would not exclude them from using the same actors and properties because they would still own them.</p>
<p>Im not suggesting that DC separate from WB, but that WB makes an imprint company that can dedicate its time to DC films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAZMAT</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136710</link>
		<dc:creator>HAZMAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136710</guid>
		<description>and no- they shouldnt do that because if they do- wouldnt they have to make new superman and batman movies with new actors that theyre positive will be in the JLA movie? and we know that theyre decision making sucks and the fans want the same actors they used in the individual films- but theyre too busy making video games with fucking mortal combat and naming the movie &quot;mortal&quot; cuz it sounds homo

on the other hand:
if they do do this and they make a greenlantern, flash, aquaman and wonderwoman films with GOOD ACTORS not fucking meyers from hellboy or some kid from high school musical- then it will be awsome and it will get loads of money. and theyd have to use the same actors from batman and superman

we all know this wont happen. and if it does itll be in a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and no- they shouldnt do that because if they do- wouldnt they have to make new superman and batman movies with new actors that theyre positive will be in the JLA movie? and we know that theyre decision making sucks and the fans want the same actors they used in the individual films- but theyre too busy making video games with fucking mortal combat and naming the movie &#8220;mortal&#8221; cuz it sounds homo</p>
<p>on the other hand:<br />
if they do do this and they make a greenlantern, flash, aquaman and wonderwoman films with GOOD ACTORS not fucking meyers from hellboy or some kid from high school musical- then it will be awsome and it will get loads of money. and theyd have to use the same actors from batman and superman</p>
<p>we all know this wont happen. and if it does itll be in a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orren Jensen</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136680</link>
		<dc:creator>Orren Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/why-dc-cant-do-what-marvel-does#comment-136680</guid>
		<description>Has any one thought of Legendary Pictures. I know that it only has a 5-year, 25-picture deal with Warner Bros. but maybe it could transform into another branch, becoming a separate production company that would succeed in comic book era. Marvel Studoes doesn’t side with one Production Company, even though it has made more movies with 20th Century Fox but its most profitable has been with Sony Pictures through The Spider-Man sires.  I am just seeing what Legendary Pictures has done with D.C. Comics and have concluded that they should merge and become D.C. Pictures. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legendary_Pictures)

Released:

*Batman Begins (2005)
*Superman Returns (2006)
Lady in the Water (2006)
The Ant Bully (2006)
Beerfest (2006)
We Are Marshall (2006)
*300 (2007)
10,000 BC (2008)

In production:

*The Dark Knight (2008)
Trick &#039;r Treat (2008)
Where the Wild Things Are (2009)
*Watchmen (2009)

In pre-production

Clash of the Titans (1981 film) remake (2010)

In development:

Kung Fu (TBA)
* Superman: The Man of Steel (2009)
Warcraft Movie (2009)
Paradise Lost (TBA)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has any one thought of Legendary Pictures. I know that it only has a 5-year, 25-picture deal with Warner Bros. but maybe it could transform into another branch, becoming a separate production company that would succeed in comic book era. Marvel Studoes doesn’t side with one Production Company, even though it has made more movies with 20th Century Fox but its most profitable has been with Sony Pictures through The Spider-Man sires.  I am just seeing what Legendary Pictures has done with D.C. Comics and have concluded that they should merge and become D.C. Pictures. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legendary_Pictures" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legendary_Pictures</a>)</p>
<p>Released:</p>
<p>*Batman Begins (2005)<br />
*Superman Returns (2006)<br />
Lady in the Water (2006)<br />
The Ant Bully (2006)<br />
Beerfest (2006)<br />
We Are Marshall (2006)<br />
*300 (2007)<br />
10,000 BC (2008)</p>
<p>In production:</p>
<p>*The Dark Knight (2008)<br />
Trick &#8216;r Treat (2008)<br />
Where the Wild Things Are (2009)<br />
*Watchmen (2009)</p>
<p>In pre-production</p>
<p>Clash of the Titans (1981 film) remake (2010)</p>
<p>In development:</p>
<p>Kung Fu (TBA)<br />
* Superman: The Man of Steel (2009)<br />
Warcraft Movie (2009)<br />
Paradise Lost (TBA)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
