 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Will Smith The Only Truly Bankable Movie Star?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:41:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-221278</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-221278</guid>
		<description>sounds like you have fun to washington&#039;s poster every night bud... real defensive of your man. Look you are absolutely right denzels&#039; films are geared towards an older audience but that doesn&#039;t make him any better or worse of an actor. What if he is just no good at serious action or comedy rolls. we don&#039;t know plus any of the will smith movies could you really see denzel in them... no. A few denzel movies i could see will smith in John Q for instance get past the fact that you already have seen denzel in it and really think with will smiths versatility he could pull off that roll i just dont think denzel is quite as versatile which doesn&#039;t make him a bad actor i love him too just dont pleasure my self to his poster but hey... do what u do sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like you have fun to washington&#8217;s poster every night bud&#8230; real defensive of your man. Look you are absolutely right denzels&#8217; films are geared towards an older audience but that doesn&#8217;t make him any better or worse of an actor. What if he is just no good at serious action or comedy rolls. we don&#8217;t know plus any of the will smith movies could you really see denzel in them&#8230; no. A few denzel movies i could see will smith in John Q for instance get past the fact that you already have seen denzel in it and really think with will smiths versatility he could pull off that roll i just dont think denzel is quite as versatile which doesn&#8217;t make him a bad actor i love him too just dont pleasure my self to his poster but hey&#8230; do what u do sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-221275</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-221275</guid>
		<description>happened across this had to leave my two cents will smith is still bankable here in 2009 everyone loves a &quot;good guy&quot; granted we only see him as the press portrays him so i will choose to believe he is a good guy your opinion is your own. Now... as far as your claim that he is not one of the best actors today how can he not be if everyone wants to see him. He must have talent to keep people interested i don&#039;t think when people go see a movie they say to themselves during the film hmmm this guy is really nice in real life, so this movie is automatically great. He plays characters as an actor that people can get involved with. Now great actors are those in my opinion who can involve the audience make their stories believable, Will Smith definitely does that and that is why his movies are so big whether the plot dialogue sequences, whatever are sub par in his films... he allows you into his world somehow relates you to what is going on. That is the mark of a talented actor give him is due. Plus he didn&#039;t just come from nowhere in movies had to start somewhere and obviously had to be good to get to where he is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>happened across this had to leave my two cents will smith is still bankable here in 2009 everyone loves a &#8220;good guy&#8221; granted we only see him as the press portrays him so i will choose to believe he is a good guy your opinion is your own. Now&#8230; as far as your claim that he is not one of the best actors today how can he not be if everyone wants to see him. He must have talent to keep people interested i don&#8217;t think when people go see a movie they say to themselves during the film hmmm this guy is really nice in real life, so this movie is automatically great. He plays characters as an actor that people can get involved with. Now great actors are those in my opinion who can involve the audience make their stories believable, Will Smith definitely does that and that is why his movies are so big whether the plot dialogue sequences, whatever are sub par in his films&#8230; he allows you into his world somehow relates you to what is going on. That is the mark of a talented actor give him is due. Plus he didn&#8217;t just come from nowhere in movies had to start somewhere and obviously had to be good to get to where he is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish Hessey Autographs</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-182015</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish Hessey Autographs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-182015</guid>
		<description>Check out an original one of a kind autographed copy of Mad Magazine by Paul Newman at &lt;a&gt;www.trishautographs.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out an original one of a kind autographed copy of Mad Magazine by Paul Newman at <a>http://www.trishautographs.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-172424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-172424</guid>
		<description>I very rarely go to the cinema, but I really love Will Smith, so I&#039;ll go to see a movie with him in it even if it looks lousy.  
Some of them I didn&#039;t really like, while other people loved it.  I think that&#039;s Will&#039;s appeal.  I don&#039;t think he specifically chooses &quot;mainstream&quot; roles, but he&#039;ll play different characters that people worldwide can relate to....not just Americans; and not just a particular race.
Also, I was (and still am) a HUGE fan of &#039;Fresh Prince of Bel Air&#039;.  That&#039;s one of my all-time favourite TV shows, so coming from that generation, Will is almost like someone I grew up with.  He still shows glimpses of that character, and he is just so damn likeable!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very rarely go to the cinema, but I really love Will Smith, so I&#8217;ll go to see a movie with him in it even if it looks lousy.<br />
Some of them I didn&#8217;t really like, while other people loved it.  I think that&#8217;s Will&#8217;s appeal.  I don&#8217;t think he specifically chooses &#8220;mainstream&#8221; roles, but he&#8217;ll play different characters that people worldwide can relate to&#8230;.not just Americans; and not just a particular race.<br />
Also, I was (and still am) a HUGE fan of &#8216;Fresh Prince of Bel Air&#8217;.  That&#8217;s one of my all-time favourite TV shows, so coming from that generation, Will is almost like someone I grew up with.  He still shows glimpses of that character, and he is just so damn likeable!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-157944</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-157944</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me?? Well I think you have really no idea what your talking about. I mean come on, if you really think Russell Crowe is the best actor alive today then your opinion just goes down the drain to me. That&#039;s hilarious (Russell Crowe lol, what the hell has he done). Will Smith is easily not only the most bankable actor but easily one of the best in the business right now!! You don&#039;t have huge flicks like that but just being charming and charismatic. His roles in The Pursuit of Happiness, I am Legend are priceless. What other actor today can step out and be something else out of his element and almost make you cry like that. For a few seconds in both of those movies, everyone forgot that he was a crazy kid on the fresh prince of bel-air. The only actor that had that type of affect was the late Heath Ledger which is number 3 on my top five actor list. What he would of been was something special.

My favorite actor and easily the best actor on the planet right now is Denzel Washington, point blank, but there is no way you can sit there and tell me logically that Will Smith is that far behind. HIs number speak for themselves. Now i will give you that Denzel does not have those huge blockbuster Will Smith does but lets be real, he has only had ONE movies where the budget was over 100 million ( American Gangster ) so its not like a huge let down or even surprise when these movies don&#039;t get the type of numbers Will Smith might have.

I was not always a Will Smith fan, I use to think he was dull, boring and could only play one type of roll, the big action film guy. But after you saw Pursuit of Happiness he changed my mind. 

He is up there and will be staying up there for as long as HE wants. So please don&#039;t compare Russell Crowe to him lol, what the hell has Russell Crowe done since Gladiator?? 

Top 5
1. Denzel Washington
2. Will Smith
3. Heath Ledger ( The new Jokers just made him better)
4. Leanardo Dicaprio ( where the hell is he at on this list, has anyone ever heard of a little movie named Titanic, The Departed, Blood Diamond )
5. Johnny Depp ( ummmmm did we forget about all the Pirates of the Caribbean and Blow those alone are classics)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me?? Well I think you have really no idea what your talking about. I mean come on, if you really think Russell Crowe is the best actor alive today then your opinion just goes down the drain to me. That&#8217;s hilarious (Russell Crowe lol, what the hell has he done). Will Smith is easily not only the most bankable actor but easily one of the best in the business right now!! You don&#8217;t have huge flicks like that but just being charming and charismatic. His roles in The Pursuit of Happiness, I am Legend are priceless. What other actor today can step out and be something else out of his element and almost make you cry like that. For a few seconds in both of those movies, everyone forgot that he was a crazy kid on the fresh prince of bel-air. The only actor that had that type of affect was the late Heath Ledger which is number 3 on my top five actor list. What he would of been was something special.</p>
<p>My favorite actor and easily the best actor on the planet right now is Denzel Washington, point blank, but there is no way you can sit there and tell me logically that Will Smith is that far behind. HIs number speak for themselves. Now i will give you that Denzel does not have those huge blockbuster Will Smith does but lets be real, he has only had ONE movies where the budget was over 100 million ( American Gangster ) so its not like a huge let down or even surprise when these movies don&#8217;t get the type of numbers Will Smith might have.</p>
<p>I was not always a Will Smith fan, I use to think he was dull, boring and could only play one type of roll, the big action film guy. But after you saw Pursuit of Happiness he changed my mind. </p>
<p>He is up there and will be staying up there for as long as HE wants. So please don&#8217;t compare Russell Crowe to him lol, what the hell has Russell Crowe done since Gladiator?? </p>
<p>Top 5<br />
1. Denzel Washington<br />
2. Will Smith<br />
3. Heath Ledger ( The new Jokers just made him better)<br />
4. Leanardo Dicaprio ( where the hell is he at on this list, has anyone ever heard of a little movie named Titanic, The Departed, Blood Diamond )<br />
5. Johnny Depp ( ummmmm did we forget about all the Pirates of the Caribbean and Blow those alone are classics)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152569</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152569</guid>
		<description>Yes, Robert Downey Jr! What I meant to say was that he&#039;s not bankable at the moment, albeit in the future he could be.  I hope so.

I took notice of him in Iron man and as a result I will watch The upcoming Soloist and Sherlock Holmes movies. 


Each time a WIll Smith movie comes out, he actually goes overseas and basically advertises the movie - much like a musician.  This was discussed in a Time issue (which I can&#039;t find sadly). Over time this technique greatly improves his movie incomes, as more people hear of him first hand and want to see him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Robert Downey Jr! What I meant to say was that he&#8217;s not bankable at the moment, albeit in the future he could be.  I hope so.</p>
<p>I took notice of him in Iron man and as a result I will watch The upcoming Soloist and Sherlock Holmes movies. </p>
<p>Each time a WIll Smith movie comes out, he actually goes overseas and basically advertises the movie &#8211; much like a musician.  This was discussed in a Time issue (which I can&#8217;t find sadly). Over time this technique greatly improves his movie incomes, as more people hear of him first hand and want to see him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152538</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152538</guid>
		<description>(Type your comment here.  Make sure you&#039;ve read the commenting rules before doing so)

For my money, Denzel is the best actor working today, and he&#039;s also an extremely bankable movie star. He could be as big as Smith, if he was truly interested in selling out.

It&#039;s true that his films rarely cross the 100 million dollar mark. But a lot of that is down to his integrity as an actor. For a start, Denzel has only ever made one film with a budget over 100 million bucks (American Gangster). So by design, Washington doesn&#039;t make films that are &quot;supposed&quot;  to be blockbusters. He specialises in intelligent, adult thrillers and dramas. He almost never makes films that rely on CGI or special effects, which Smith does with regularity (in fact, Denzel turned down the lead in Smith&#039;s I,ROBOT, a CGI driven blockbuster in favor of THE MANCHURIAN CANIDATE, a serious, character driven political thriller). Washington has had plenty of opportunities to make the kind of guaranteed summer blockbusters that Smith makes, but he turns them down for the most part. You won&#039;t see Denzel in HANCOCK or MEN IN BLACK 2.

Because Denzel cultivates a more adult audience, instead of trying to grab every available demographic the way Smith does, it&#039;s difficult for him to get those sort of ridiculous Box Office numbers that Smith often records. I think Denzel prefers to straddle the line between being a respected serious actor and a box office draw, and it reflects in his film choices.

If you look at Denzel&#039;s opening weekend consistency, he&#039;s easily one of the most bankable stars alive. Denzel pretty much guarantees a 20 million+ opening weekend for any commercial studio film. His films won&#039;t neccesarily make 100 million domestic, but they rarely have huge budgets in the first place, so the studios make a profit.

Denzel is also pretty bankable overseas. His last three wide release films made more overseas than they did in America. On average, his films now make around 200 million dollars (including domestic and international totals).

The truth is, if Denzel started working with 100 million dollar + budgets, special effects, PG rated films, he&#039;d be close to Will Smith&#039;s box officed level. But I doubt he&#039;d be as respected as an actor. Smith makes films to please everybody. Denzel makes films to please grown-ups. Therin lies the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Type your comment here.  Make sure you&#8217;ve read the commenting rules before doing so)</p>
<p>For my money, Denzel is the best actor working today, and he&#8217;s also an extremely bankable movie star. He could be as big as Smith, if he was truly interested in selling out.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that his films rarely cross the 100 million dollar mark. But a lot of that is down to his integrity as an actor. For a start, Denzel has only ever made one film with a budget over 100 million bucks (American Gangster). So by design, Washington doesn&#8217;t make films that are &#8220;supposed&#8221;  to be blockbusters. He specialises in intelligent, adult thrillers and dramas. He almost never makes films that rely on CGI or special effects, which Smith does with regularity (in fact, Denzel turned down the lead in Smith&#8217;s I,ROBOT, a CGI driven blockbuster in favor of THE MANCHURIAN CANIDATE, a serious, character driven political thriller). Washington has had plenty of opportunities to make the kind of guaranteed summer blockbusters that Smith makes, but he turns them down for the most part. You won&#8217;t see Denzel in HANCOCK or MEN IN BLACK 2.</p>
<p>Because Denzel cultivates a more adult audience, instead of trying to grab every available demographic the way Smith does, it&#8217;s difficult for him to get those sort of ridiculous Box Office numbers that Smith often records. I think Denzel prefers to straddle the line between being a respected serious actor and a box office draw, and it reflects in his film choices.</p>
<p>If you look at Denzel&#8217;s opening weekend consistency, he&#8217;s easily one of the most bankable stars alive. Denzel pretty much guarantees a 20 million+ opening weekend for any commercial studio film. His films won&#8217;t neccesarily make 100 million domestic, but they rarely have huge budgets in the first place, so the studios make a profit.</p>
<p>Denzel is also pretty bankable overseas. His last three wide release films made more overseas than they did in America. On average, his films now make around 200 million dollars (including domestic and international totals).</p>
<p>The truth is, if Denzel started working with 100 million dollar + budgets, special effects, PG rated films, he&#8217;d be close to Will Smith&#8217;s box officed level. But I doubt he&#8217;d be as respected as an actor. Smith makes films to please everybody. Denzel makes films to please grown-ups. Therin lies the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152297</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152297</guid>
		<description>Hey Michael,

Robert Downey Jr.?????  Except for Iron Man his movies have al basically flopped in the last 10 years.  He&#039;s had 1 hit movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Michael,</p>
<p>Robert Downey Jr.?????  Except for Iron Man his movies have al basically flopped in the last 10 years.  He&#8217;s had 1 hit movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152296</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152296</guid>
		<description>Dawney Jr. (Iron Man) is turning into a bankable movie star. 

I&#039;ve noticed that every trailer for a WIll Smith movie looked good; I wanted to see that movie after watching its trailer. Sadly, this is not the case for many excellent movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawney Jr. (Iron Man) is turning into a bankable movie star. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that every trailer for a WIll Smith movie looked good; I wanted to see that movie after watching its trailer. Sadly, this is not the case for many excellent movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152193</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/is-will-smith-the-only-truly-bankable-movie-star#comment-152193</guid>
		<description>Hey &quot;Steve&quot;

If you think this article is &quot;attacking&quot; Will Smith, then you&#039;re as stupid as shit:

&quot;Will Smith is a solid actor. Yes he gets damn annoying when he plays what seems to be the exact same guy in many films… but when he’s called upon to be something more, or to play someone outside his regular range, he nails it (Pursuit of Happyness, Ali).&quot;

Yup, sure sounds like I&#039;m attacking him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8220;Steve&#8221;</p>
<p>If you think this article is &#8220;attacking&#8221; Will Smith, then you&#8217;re as stupid as shit:</p>
<p>&#8220;Will Smith is a solid actor. Yes he gets damn annoying when he plays what seems to be the exact same guy in many films… but when he’s called upon to be something more, or to play someone outside his regular range, he nails it (Pursuit of Happyness, Ali).&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup, sure sounds like I&#8217;m attacking him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
