 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joss Whedon Interview &#8211; Cue Laugh Track</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:48:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track#comment-150494</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track#comment-150494</guid>
		<description>I think he isn&#039;t so much talking about females in lead roles but actually having females playing the STRONG lead of a show.  Lucy was still a second rate citizen always fearing the wrath of Ricky if her stay at home housewife roles were interupted by her antics.

Mary Tyler Moore was certainly a strong female lead, but she was still presented carefully as a second rate citizen because of her gender.  She worked at a TV station and was in a secretarial role, while a man ran the show with a male anchor on TV.  Sure she was independent, but still was limited as to what she could do.

Joss doesn&#039;t claim to be a trailblazer, but he is doing his part making females in strong leadership roles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he isn&#8217;t so much talking about females in lead roles but actually having females playing the STRONG lead of a show.  Lucy was still a second rate citizen always fearing the wrath of Ricky if her stay at home housewife roles were interupted by her antics.</p>
<p>Mary Tyler Moore was certainly a strong female lead, but she was still presented carefully as a second rate citizen because of her gender.  She worked at a TV station and was in a secretarial role, while a man ran the show with a male anchor on TV.  Sure she was independent, but still was limited as to what she could do.</p>
<p>Joss doesn&#8217;t claim to be a trailblazer, but he is doing his part making females in strong leadership roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DFav</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track#comment-150469</link>
		<dc:creator>DFav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track#comment-150469</guid>
		<description>I like a lot of what Whedon says, but the TV comment makes no sense. Mary Tyler Moore had arguably the most popular sitcom of the &#039;70s. And isn&#039;t the Lucy Show the most important sitcom ever? That was in the &#039;50s. For at least the last 40 years the &quot;father&quot; figure of sitcoms has been the most maligned for story purposes (everything from the bumblings of Homer Simpson back to the ignorance of Archie Bunker). I don&#039;t see where women on TV have gotten the short end of the stick (ba-dum-dum). Maybe Whedon wants to make himself out to be some kind of a pioneer with Buffy or something. Since he based the character on how Kitty Pryde was portrayed in X-Men comics from the &#039;70s, I don&#039;t see Whedon as a trailblazer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like a lot of what Whedon says, but the TV comment makes no sense. Mary Tyler Moore had arguably the most popular sitcom of the &#8217;70s. And isn&#8217;t the Lucy Show the most important sitcom ever? That was in the &#8217;50s. For at least the last 40 years the &#8220;father&#8221; figure of sitcoms has been the most maligned for story purposes (everything from the bumblings of Homer Simpson back to the ignorance of Archie Bunker). I don&#8217;t see where women on TV have gotten the short end of the stick (ba-dum-dum). Maybe Whedon wants to make himself out to be some kind of a pioneer with Buffy or something. Since he based the character on how Kitty Pryde was portrayed in X-Men comics from the &#8217;70s, I don&#8217;t see Whedon as a trailblazer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinexcellence</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track#comment-150468</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinexcellence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/joss-whedon-interview-cue-laugh-track#comment-150468</guid>
		<description>&quot;There’s plenty of cool comics with female characters… But all it takes is one Catwoman to set the cause back a decade.&quot;

Brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s plenty of cool comics with female characters… But all it takes is one Catwoman to set the cause back a decade.&#8221;</p>
<p>Brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
