 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Movie Blog: Uncut Podcast &#8211; July 7th 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:48:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RiZE</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-166190</link>
		<dc:creator>RiZE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-166190</guid>
		<description>will smith is NOT a scientologist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will smith is NOT a scientologist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug nagy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-148531</link>
		<dc:creator>doug nagy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-148531</guid>
		<description>I hate Rogers now too Chris, after my contract is up - I will go to another (hopefully new) provider.  I am hoping that T-Mobile will come to Canada or AT&amp;T.  I would love to support Canadian companies, but it gets hard when they scam and screw like these two do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate Rogers now too Chris, after my contract is up &#8211; I will go to another (hopefully new) provider.  I am hoping that T-Mobile will come to Canada or AT&amp;T.  I would love to support Canadian companies, but it gets hard when they scam and screw like these two do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finaljoe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147439</link>
		<dc:creator>finaljoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147439</guid>
		<description>Lions for Lambs was not a Tom Cruise film. He was a supporting actor.  Nobody was saying Cruise wasn&#039;t a bankable actor after Magnolia and that only made $22 million with a lot of high profile actors and a lot of buzz (much better than Lions for Lambs and most critics agreed that Cruise was the best part of Lions for Lambs). 

If Valkyrie flops then we might question Cruise&#039;s bankability.  But then again Valkyrie isn&#039;t the type of film that makes big bucks whether it stars Tom Cruise, Will Smith or an not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lions for Lambs was not a Tom Cruise film. He was a supporting actor.  Nobody was saying Cruise wasn&#8217;t a bankable actor after Magnolia and that only made $22 million with a lot of high profile actors and a lot of buzz (much better than Lions for Lambs and most critics agreed that Cruise was the best part of Lions for Lambs). </p>
<p>If Valkyrie flops then we might question Cruise&#8217;s bankability.  But then again Valkyrie isn&#8217;t the type of film that makes big bucks whether it stars Tom Cruise, Will Smith or an not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert(wolf)</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147305</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert(wolf)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147305</guid>
		<description>Wanted deserves that 3rd spot. It&#039;s fantastic. James Mc was awesome. That dude can play anything. He is one of them stars that can drag me to any movie he is in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanted deserves that 3rd spot. It&#8217;s fantastic. James Mc was awesome. That dude can play anything. He is one of them stars that can drag me to any movie he is in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147191</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147191</guid>
		<description>Hey John How About Mel Gibson As Being A Bankable Star. I was watching Signs last night and remember it made a crap load of money as a lot of his films have.

What do you say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John How About Mel Gibson As Being A Bankable Star. I was watching Signs last night and remember it made a crap load of money as a lot of his films have.</p>
<p>What do you say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147190</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147190</guid>
		<description>By the way, John you didn&#039;t mention anything on the show about your action against Variety.  How come?  I wanted to hear if you had reached some resolultion with them.  Or does the boycott continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, John you didn&#8217;t mention anything on the show about your action against Variety.  How come?  I wanted to hear if you had reached some resolultion with them.  Or does the boycott continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147185</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147185</guid>
		<description>Hey John and Doug.  I just wanted to comment on your support for Rogers.  I know that Bell isn&#039;t a great company, but I&#039;m not sure that Rogers is a saint either.  You will probably see that when you check the rates for your new iPhone.  For the last several weeks they have been in some hot water for having the highest prices in the world to use an iPhone.  There is even an online petition that has been featured in newspapers and on news broadcasts. The link to the petition is here if your interested.  

http://www.ruinediphone.com/

Also, I don&#039;t mind the ordering of your list.  The only film that I kind of disagree with is Wall-E.  I wasn&#039;t blown away by the film. I liked it and I liked its personality, but I think that the story needed something.  They reached the turning point of the film and then it ended in like 20 mins.  Is just to short for me.  If the end was longer I would rank it higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John and Doug.  I just wanted to comment on your support for Rogers.  I know that Bell isn&#8217;t a great company, but I&#8217;m not sure that Rogers is a saint either.  You will probably see that when you check the rates for your new iPhone.  For the last several weeks they have been in some hot water for having the highest prices in the world to use an iPhone.  There is even an online petition that has been featured in newspapers and on news broadcasts. The link to the petition is here if your interested.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ruinediphone.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ruinediphone.com/</a></p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t mind the ordering of your list.  The only film that I kind of disagree with is Wall-E.  I wasn&#8217;t blown away by the film. I liked it and I liked its personality, but I think that the story needed something.  They reached the turning point of the film and then it ended in like 20 mins.  Is just to short for me.  If the end was longer I would rank it higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassinet</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147183</link>
		<dc:creator>bassinet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147183</guid>
		<description>Courteney Cox is hot and I always thought it was a shame that her movie career post-Friends seems even worse than her career pre-Friends (she at least had Ace Ventura beforehand, but what has she had since 2004?).

Regarding the Alice in Wonderland film, who matter who the lead is I think they&#039;ll just sexualize it anyway. Not in an overt way, but they will. They&#039;ll make it look somewhere between &quot;cutesy little girl&quot; and &quot;fetish goth&quot;. All the parents will feel slightly dirty about bringing their kids to it, but the advertising push won&#039;t really give them a choice. I feel like I&#039;ve already seen Tim Burton&#039;s Alice in Wonderland. I think the whole exercise would be completely predictable, yes right down to the almost inevitable casting of Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter. Sorry to sound so negative, but I feel like Burton&#039;s style stopped being interesting a long time ago. Still, I can see that Willy Wonka, for example, was a good enough movie--I just don&#039;t get the hype for the stylization. To me it&#039;s like a few steps above looking forward to another movie where Eddie Murphy dresses up as a fat person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courteney Cox is hot and I always thought it was a shame that her movie career post-Friends seems even worse than her career pre-Friends (she at least had Ace Ventura beforehand, but what has she had since 2004?).</p>
<p>Regarding the Alice in Wonderland film, who matter who the lead is I think they&#8217;ll just sexualize it anyway. Not in an overt way, but they will. They&#8217;ll make it look somewhere between &#8220;cutesy little girl&#8221; and &#8220;fetish goth&#8221;. All the parents will feel slightly dirty about bringing their kids to it, but the advertising push won&#8217;t really give them a choice. I feel like I&#8217;ve already seen Tim Burton&#8217;s Alice in Wonderland. I think the whole exercise would be completely predictable, yes right down to the almost inevitable casting of Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter. Sorry to sound so negative, but I feel like Burton&#8217;s style stopped being interesting a long time ago. Still, I can see that Willy Wonka, for example, was a good enough movie&#8211;I just don&#8217;t get the hype for the stylization. To me it&#8217;s like a few steps above looking forward to another movie where Eddie Murphy dresses up as a fat person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krazie835</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147170</link>
		<dc:creator>krazie835</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147170</guid>
		<description>Insomnia had deleted scenes I believe.  =)

I think that Courtney Cox could have a solid movie career. She has been in a few films where she shined. She was good in the Scream movies, and she came out in a small little film called November....I think that&#039;s what it&#039;s called lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insomnia had deleted scenes I believe.  =)</p>
<p>I think that Courtney Cox could have a solid movie career. She has been in a few films where she shined. She was good in the Scream movies, and she came out in a small little film called November&#8230;.I think that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s called lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147169</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/07/the-movie-blog-uncut-podcast-july-7th-2008#comment-147169</guid>
		<description>@Sahil 

In regards to Aniston, all of those movies that you listed, save for The Break Up, BOMBED.  She&#039;s not as hot as people were saying.  People were calling her the next Julia, but people do not go to her movies.  Nobody cares about her.  She&#039;s bland as hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sahil </p>
<p>In regards to Aniston, all of those movies that you listed, save for The Break Up, BOMBED.  She&#8217;s not as hot as people were saying.  People were calling her the next Julia, but people do not go to her movies.  Nobody cares about her.  She&#8217;s bland as hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
