Comments on: Zach and Miri Make a Porno gets NC-17 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17 The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:01:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Tim1974 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-169968 Tim1974 Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:02:34 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-169968 Another tiresome, redundant use of male frontal nudity. The double standard against men continues. I hope that young men will soon realize that they are being had and refuse to see shows that do not include an equal amount of female frontal nudity. It is about respect and equality. Another tiresome, redundant use of male frontal nudity. The double standard against men continues. I hope that young men will soon realize that they are being had and refuse to see shows that do not include an equal amount of female frontal nudity. It is about respect and equality.

]]> By: Billy http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-169426 Billy Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:55:12 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-169426 I'll tell you what it is Kelly; since the late 90s (like 97' on) I can't think of a mainstream R' rated film with female genatalia even 'oops a daisy' glanced at. While you look at the R' rated films in the 70s and 80s (even early 90s) female genatalia is openly celebrated on R' rated films; however, the catalist for devolution (towards prudism in film) was the 'corporate, money makin' scam thrusted upon society that a woman should trim herself lookin akin' to a 12 year old; or a few years after that, shave it off like a baby girl. This was hypnotically induced upon society through the brainwash technique of 'your not clean otherwize'. Wow, I wonder what the men of the 70s n 80s did during sex, hold their nose? Having disproved that B.S. (back to the subject), a shaved, open to display (for camera) vulva has always been way too sexually graphic for R films; while a penis is....well..you know not very sexually overloading (get it; its more humour). THIS IS OBVIOUS (when you think about it as a strait guy). BTW, bush shots on film back then hid it enough for sensual suggestion and fair game on R' film. I’ll tell you what it is Kelly; since the late 90s (like 97′ on) I can’t think of a mainstream R’ rated film with female genatalia even ‘oops a daisy’ glanced at. While you look at the R’ rated films in the 70s and 80s (even early 90s) female genatalia is openly celebrated on R’ rated films; however, the catalist for devolution (towards prudism in film) was the ‘corporate, money makin’ scam thrusted upon society that a woman should trim herself lookin akin’ to a 12 year old; or a few years after that, shave it off like a baby girl. This was hypnotically induced upon society through the brainwash technique of ‘your not clean otherwize’. Wow, I wonder what the men of the 70s n 80s did during sex, hold their nose? Having disproved that B.S. (back to the subject), a shaved, open to display (for camera) vulva has always been way too sexually graphic for R films; while a penis is….well..you know not very sexually overloading (get it; its more humour). THIS IS OBVIOUS (when you think about it as a strait guy). BTW, bush shots on film back then hid it enough for sensual suggestion and fair game on R’ film.

]]> By: Kelly http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-167643 Kelly Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:57:11 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-167643 It seems like female nudity gets a higher rating from the MPAA than male nudity. Penises are R-rated but vaginas get an NC-17. (which is the same as CENSORSHIP)Why the hell is that anyway? I'm sure more people would rather see a woman's vulva or anus than a man's penis and scrotum, so how come penises abound in R-rated movies but we never see an actual vagina? It's a sexist double standard. I'm sick of seeing dicks in these R-rated comedies; it's time we start seeing vaginas instead. And I'm not talking about just showing female pubic hair, but the entire female anatomy (vulva and anus) should be allowed to be shown in an R-rated movie just like they can show the entire male anatomy. Regarding the comment posted here that Kevin Smith said the NC-17 was for showing a close-up of a vagina or an anus, that just proves how sexist and unfair the MPAA is when it comes to female nudity. "Walk Hard" showed a close-up of a penis for about 10 seconds and they gave it an R , so how come showing a woman's vagina or anus for 1 quick second gets threatened with an NC-17? Whatever happened to "equality", huh? It seems like female nudity gets a higher rating from the MPAA than male nudity. Penises are R-rated but vaginas get an NC-17. (which is the same as CENSORSHIP)Why the hell is that anyway? I’m sure more people would rather see a woman’s vulva or anus than a man’s penis and scrotum, so how come penises abound in R-rated movies but we never see an actual vagina? It’s a sexist double standard.

I’m sick of seeing dicks in these R-rated comedies; it’s time we start seeing vaginas instead. And I’m not talking about just showing female pubic hair, but the entire female anatomy (vulva and anus) should be allowed to be shown in an R-rated movie just like they can show the entire male anatomy. Regarding the comment posted here that Kevin Smith said the NC-17 was for showing a close-up of a vagina or an anus, that just proves how sexist and unfair the MPAA is when it comes to female nudity. “Walk Hard” showed a close-up of a penis for about 10 seconds and they gave it an R , so how come showing a woman’s vagina or anus for 1 quick second gets threatened with an NC-17? Whatever happened to “equality”, huh?

]]> By: Jason http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-160309 Jason Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:38:37 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-160309 Does anybody know if we get to see Elizabeth Banks nude? Does anybody know if we get to see Elizabeth Banks nude?

]]> By: Rodney http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-152125 Rodney Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:49:15 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-152125 CMC.... that wasn't a typo. The point is that removing an offensive scene wont change the movie so much that the original vision is compromised. CMC…. that wasn’t a typo.

The point is that removing an offensive scene wont change the movie so much that the original vision is compromised.

]]> By: CMC http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-152095 CMC Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:22:03 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-152095 you missed a typo lemme help you out: you said "destroy the integrity of the film" for a kevin smith movie. you missed a typo lemme help you out:

you said “destroy the integrity of the film” for a kevin smith movie.

]]> By: Rodney http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151628 Rodney Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:11:00 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151628 Hazmat, In Canada if a movie is Rated R you have to be 18. Period. We have a rating called 18a that works much like the R in the US does. So they serve the same purpose, but are called differently. Hazmat, In Canada if a movie is Rated R you have to be 18. Period.

We have a rating called 18a that works much like the R in the US does. So they serve the same purpose, but are called differently.

]]> By: HAZMAT http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151618 HAZMAT Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:10:15 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151618 ha! when was the last time that happened? rodney- can you be 30 and bring someone underage in that movie? or is it RESTRICTED for minors? i hope that if it ends up being R- they show the whole good thing in DVD...the full version ha! when was the last time that happened?

rodney- can you be 30 and bring someone underage in that movie? or is it RESTRICTED for minors?

i hope that if it ends up being R- they show the whole good thing in DVD…the full version

]]> By: aaron http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151615 aaron Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:00:11 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151615 it was only a matter of time till this got an NC-17. this film's box office will get toned down because of it it was only a matter of time till this got an NC-17. this film’s box office will get toned down because of it

]]> By: Rodney http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151564 Rodney Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:26:44 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/07/zach-and-miri-make-a-porno-gets-nc-17#comment-151564 Back in the 80s there were LOTS of boobs shown in movies. Even by todays standards Boobshots only really count as "mild nudity" Back in the 80s there were LOTS of boobs shown in movies. Even by todays standards Boobshots only really count as “mild nudity”

]]>