 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Time Biggest Box Office Draw Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:26:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-162168</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-162168</guid>
		<description>Dark Knight in 35th place?  Sounds about right in every way, shape and form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dark Knight in 35th place?  Sounds about right in every way, shape and form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bickleson</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160466</link>
		<dc:creator>bickleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160466</guid>
		<description>finaljoe - how many viewings per day you think people could watch GWTW...I&#039;m guessing 2 (3 or more if you are homeless) plus on different days they also can buy 1 ticket with multiple viewings.  Yep I agree people will see it again if they want to and also if they were dragged in again by wife/cousin/friend, so many factors for one final number.
armand...totally agree peeps put too much into something if it won an oscar or not and they use that to argue their film of choice is superior...same with music and the grammy&#039;s...we know that is pure caca....and lets not forget that agents and studios go on the &quot;Academy campaign&quot; /cough - gift basket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finaljoe &#8211; how many viewings per day you think people could watch GWTW&#8230;I&#8217;m guessing 2 (3 or more if you are homeless) plus on different days they also can buy 1 ticket with multiple viewings.  Yep I agree people will see it again if they want to and also if they were dragged in again by wife/cousin/friend, so many factors for one final number.<br />
armand&#8230;totally agree peeps put too much into something if it won an oscar or not and they use that to argue their film of choice is superior&#8230;same with music and the grammy&#8217;s&#8230;we know that is pure caca&#8230;.and lets not forget that agents and studios go on the &#8220;Academy campaign&#8221; /cough &#8211; gift basket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armand</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160357</link>
		<dc:creator>Armand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160357</guid>
		<description>Lets just judge the movie on its own merits shall we?

GWTW was the champ in its heyday. Given that there was no piracy, multiplexes, competitions, limited outlets for movie entertainment, it was a no brainer that GWTW was able to reap so much at that time. Also, the cost of movie productions was much lesser than, in addition to the cost of living.

DK2, just like Titanic should be applauded for being able to achieve so much with the competitions they had to faced

Pirated DVDs being made available within days of the movies out in the theatres, internet downloading, huge cost of production and advertising, the movie being made available to DVD less than 6 months after its theatre showing etc..,  these are some of the factors that GWTW was safe from. 

All the above also played a part in the choice of moviegoers wanting to wait for the dvd or buying the pirated copy, instead of rushing to the theatres to watch it in the big screen. 

So to say that DK2 or Titanic is smaller than GWTW is not fair since we are not basing our judgement on the factors mentioned above. 

There is no one true-tested method of knowing which movie is bigger than the other in terms of its attendance or B.O tally. Given the rapid changes to the taste of the moviegoers on how they would prefer to watch the movies and also of the currency inflation, don&#039;t be surprise to see Scary Movie part 231 or Friday the 13th part 349 , on day having a B.O above Titanic or DK2. 

So John, the above article is kind of good but I disagree with your recommendation  to gauge the movie&#039;s success based on the number of tickets sold.

Oh! To some other members here, Oscar has nothing to do with the movie whether it is any good or bad. Oscars were given by a group of actors, those in movie productions on their preferred choice of the movies they like. It is not like the &quot;American Music Award&#039; where the public chose the ones they like. 

To say that Crash was better than Brokeback Mountain or that Shakespeare in Love was better than Saving Private Ryan is a a matter of personal preference. Using Oscar as the &#039;better&#039; factor is simply &#039;crap&#039; pardon the language.  I for one, care not for which movie wins the Oscar. If I like the movie, I go watch it and buy the DVD or care enough to vote for it in IMDB or Rottentomatoes. I am not going to listen and agree to what a bunch of ballonies who decide to give the Oscar to some movies they like. 

Tks for reading
Armand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets just judge the movie on its own merits shall we?</p>
<p>GWTW was the champ in its heyday. Given that there was no piracy, multiplexes, competitions, limited outlets for movie entertainment, it was a no brainer that GWTW was able to reap so much at that time. Also, the cost of movie productions was much lesser than, in addition to the cost of living.</p>
<p>DK2, just like Titanic should be applauded for being able to achieve so much with the competitions they had to faced</p>
<p>Pirated DVDs being made available within days of the movies out in the theatres, internet downloading, huge cost of production and advertising, the movie being made available to DVD less than 6 months after its theatre showing etc..,  these are some of the factors that GWTW was safe from. </p>
<p>All the above also played a part in the choice of moviegoers wanting to wait for the dvd or buying the pirated copy, instead of rushing to the theatres to watch it in the big screen. </p>
<p>So to say that DK2 or Titanic is smaller than GWTW is not fair since we are not basing our judgement on the factors mentioned above. </p>
<p>There is no one true-tested method of knowing which movie is bigger than the other in terms of its attendance or B.O tally. Given the rapid changes to the taste of the moviegoers on how they would prefer to watch the movies and also of the currency inflation, don&#8217;t be surprise to see Scary Movie part 231 or Friday the 13th part 349 , on day having a B.O above Titanic or DK2. </p>
<p>So John, the above article is kind of good but I disagree with your recommendation  to gauge the movie&#8217;s success based on the number of tickets sold.</p>
<p>Oh! To some other members here, Oscar has nothing to do with the movie whether it is any good or bad. Oscars were given by a group of actors, those in movie productions on their preferred choice of the movies they like. It is not like the &#8220;American Music Award&#8217; where the public chose the ones they like. </p>
<p>To say that Crash was better than Brokeback Mountain or that Shakespeare in Love was better than Saving Private Ryan is a a matter of personal preference. Using Oscar as the &#8216;better&#8217; factor is simply &#8216;crap&#8217; pardon the language.  I for one, care not for which movie wins the Oscar. If I like the movie, I go watch it and buy the DVD or care enough to vote for it in IMDB or Rottentomatoes. I am not going to listen and agree to what a bunch of ballonies who decide to give the Oscar to some movies they like. </p>
<p>Tks for reading<br />
Armand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finaljoe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160268</link>
		<dc:creator>finaljoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160268</guid>
		<description>Actually bickleson in the 30s and 40s people could buy ONE ticket and stay in the cinema for the entire day.  Whereas today you can only have one viewing per ticket.  Mark anoter against that theory.

Also people wouldn&#039;t go to see Gone with the Wind agan if they didn&#039;t want to.  Another plus for its immense popularity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually bickleson in the 30s and 40s people could buy ONE ticket and stay in the cinema for the entire day.  Whereas today you can only have one viewing per ticket.  Mark anoter against that theory.</p>
<p>Also people wouldn&#8217;t go to see Gone with the Wind agan if they didn&#8217;t want to.  Another plus for its immense popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bickleson</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160206</link>
		<dc:creator>bickleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160206</guid>
		<description>Back in the GWTW days they HAD to go to the theater and purchase another ticket for repeat viewings, and they did many times for how relevant the film was in society at the time....modern times we can watch The Dark Knight over and over in different mediums other than film, and we will for how relevant the film is in society today.  So I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;d trust tickets sold back then versus ticket sales now as much as I don&#039;t trust the gross back then to now, inflation blah blah...i did enjoy reading everyone&#039;s opinions. 

to some folks the biggest film of all time is big mamma&#039;s house 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the GWTW days they HAD to go to the theater and purchase another ticket for repeat viewings, and they did many times for how relevant the film was in society at the time&#8230;.modern times we can watch The Dark Knight over and over in different mediums other than film, and we will for how relevant the film is in society today.  So I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;d trust tickets sold back then versus ticket sales now as much as I don&#8217;t trust the gross back then to now, inflation blah blah&#8230;i did enjoy reading everyone&#8217;s opinions. </p>
<p>to some folks the biggest film of all time is big mamma&#8217;s house 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch Full Free Legal Movies Here</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160044</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Full Free Legal Movies Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-160044</guid>
		<description>Stick to the last ten years or so. For &quot;Gone With The Wind&quot;, frankly my dear, I don&#039;t give a darn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick to the last ten years or so. For &#8220;Gone With The Wind&#8221;, frankly my dear, I don&#8217;t give a darn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamish</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159600</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159600</guid>
		<description>Final Joe, you make no sense, and you argue both sides, what is your point really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Final Joe, you make no sense, and you argue both sides, what is your point really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finaljoe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159590</link>
		<dc:creator>finaljoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159590</guid>
		<description>&quot;As I said release Gone with the Wind today and it would not be the biggest film of all time. &quot;

So? If Alexander was around today he probably wouldn&#039;t have conquered most of the modern world.  What&#039;s your point?  Stop trying to invalidate history and era.  IT HAPPENED. Your hypothetical situations DID NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I said release Gone with the Wind today and it would not be the biggest film of all time. &#8221;</p>
<p>So? If Alexander was around today he probably wouldn&#8217;t have conquered most of the modern world.  What&#8217;s your point?  Stop trying to invalidate history and era.  IT HAPPENED. Your hypothetical situations DID NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finaljoe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159589</link>
		<dc:creator>finaljoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159589</guid>
		<description>&quot;how about we compare initial theatrical runs? that oughta level the playing field somewhat, seeing as modern movies rarely, if ever, get more than one theatrical run. if you’re including multiple releases for pre-home video movies, you have to account for that somehow.&quot; 

Films are only re-released or kept in a cinema if there is a demand for them.  What other reason is there to look at the box office other than seeing what kind of demand a film had?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;how about we compare initial theatrical runs? that oughta level the playing field somewhat, seeing as modern movies rarely, if ever, get more than one theatrical run. if you’re including multiple releases for pre-home video movies, you have to account for that somehow.&#8221; </p>
<p>Films are only re-released or kept in a cinema if there is a demand for them.  What other reason is there to look at the box office other than seeing what kind of demand a film had?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finaljoe</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159588</link>
		<dc:creator>finaljoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/all-time-biggest-box-office-draw-movies#comment-159588</guid>
		<description>&quot;in todays time with so many different forms of entertainment available, for The Dark Knight making $500+ million is far more impressive to me than Gone with the Wind selling however many tickets.

What other forms of entertainment were challenging it for peoples disposable income? Were people deciding between a host of other films, Television shows, internet, video games etc?

Youre point is well taken but its still apples and oranges. There are so many variables. Its fun to speculate, but its also futile in this case.&quot;

There was a little thing called World War II happening at the time.

And kiddies did like those new fangled comic books things starring characters known as &quot;The Batman&quot;.  I don&#039;t blame you if you haven&#039;t heard of them as they&#039;re pretty much obsulete now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;in todays time with so many different forms of entertainment available, for The Dark Knight making $500+ million is far more impressive to me than Gone with the Wind selling however many tickets.</p>
<p>What other forms of entertainment were challenging it for peoples disposable income? Were people deciding between a host of other films, Television shows, internet, video games etc?</p>
<p>Youre point is well taken but its still apples and oranges. There are so many variables. Its fun to speculate, but its also futile in this case.&#8221;</p>
<p>There was a little thing called World War II happening at the time.</p>
<p>And kiddies did like those new fangled comic books things starring characters known as &#8220;The Batman&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t blame you if you haven&#8217;t heard of them as they&#8217;re pretty much obsulete now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
