Just kidding. Rodney in all honesty all of this is meant to be taken in a friendly spirit. Passionate yet always friendly.

Believe it or not but its the truth.

and Hyperbole?!? yeah. no one here at the movie blog has ever used hyperbole. Don’t make me laugh rodney.
Do you actually reads the movie blog or listen to the show?

You are the one who said in hollywood nothing is absolute so therefore my Philadelphia example is possible.

To quote, well, you “Nothing in Hollywood is absolute”

So you know you have no point and you just want the last word?

Go ahead.

Im tired of repeating myself so you can keep going.

I was saying that your theory that he escaped from the ambulance and what not could not have happened because they staged his funeral. They could only do that if they knew his exact whereabouts.

Hell Tom Hanks could still be alive at the end of Philadelphia.
I mean if we are just making shit up go hog wild. What if what really happened was that they made an experimental aids cure that they tried only on him and they have kept him in a lab all this time. They needed to keep a secret as a secret government agancy didn’t want it leaking that they had finally cured it. so all this time he has been kept in a lab. But he is tired of being locked away and is going to make a break for freedom to reunite with antonio banderas.

Tom Hanks in Philadelphia 2: Philadelphia Freedom

and Why do I continue to post?
Because you and others keep replying.

And you were there to verify the body and identify it? Maybe there is a conspiracy to cover up his survivel and they stage the funeral so everyone thinks Harvey is dead.

No matter what excuse you give of absolutes, I can write a reasonably plausible story hook to bring him back.

I am not saying he wont stay dead. No one is claiming that you are absolutely wrong and that he is still alive.

The point is he COULD be alive. NOTHING is absolute no matter how the film ended.

In the comics Ras Al Guhl uses a “ressurection pool” to return to life more than once. And thats a little more supernatural than Nolan seems to be going, but it COULD.

Nothing in Hollywood is absolute.

I am not saying they HAVE to bring him back. But they CAN if they choose to.

Why are you STILL griping about this when you already bowed out with your “I know I am right” rebuttal?

I think it is undeniable that their original intent was to kill the dent character. Regardless of the imaginary scenarios you guys have made entirely made up in your heads when they wrote the script they wrote that he died. Then they filmed an ending with him lying lifeless on the ground showing no signs of being alive

All I have been saying is that there is absolutely no evidence at all to lead you to believe that dent lived. Nothing.

Of course they can bring him back if they want too. We have Highlander 2 after all. It would be a cheap shitty thing to do. That is all I have been saying all along.

The other reason is that the way they told his story was so complete that to go through his character again sounds incredibly boring to me.

If you want to believe he lived and is hidden away arkham have at it.

But I will bet anything that dent is not in the next film.

Finally, I would say that Batman going into exile over a mistake would not be a good way to end the movie, and if I know anything about Nolan, he wouldn’t do that. And I think it would be a safe assumption that Nolan would have some idea about where he’s taking the next movie when he helped write that, at least as it pertains to Dent.

because they showed a flash forward to them holding his funeral so thats one theory that definitely didn’t happen.

the only possible explanation is this keeping him a secret locked up in arkham theory that is going around. And that is just silly if you ask me.,