 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return to Castle Wolfenstein Still Happening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:33:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154520</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 07:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154520</guid>
		<description>Sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154228</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154228</guid>
		<description>I editted out the part where you called me an idiot.  But if you want to use my ability to remove your violations of the commenting rules here as an excuse to argue your point, I feel you have already bowed out.

I can only repeat the same facts so many times while you argumentatively agree with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I editted out the part where you called me an idiot.  But if you want to use my ability to remove your violations of the commenting rules here as an excuse to argue your point, I feel you have already bowed out.</p>
<p>I can only repeat the same facts so many times while you argumentatively agree with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154225</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154225</guid>
		<description>A bit sensitive are we? What name did I call you?

This argument seems to go way over your head and there is no point going on if one is equipped with an edit button to fit his agenda.

Sorry. You&#039;ll just have to play with yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit sensitive are we? What name did I call you?</p>
<p>This argument seems to go way over your head and there is no point going on if one is equipped with an edit button to fit his agenda.</p>
<p>Sorry. You&#8217;ll just have to play with yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154144</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154144</guid>
		<description>And I suppose by making short films that display his techniques of special effects and 30 second commercial spots this makes him qualified to do a scifi tentpole feature film?

No.  It qualifies him to be on the effects team.

You are still proving my point. 

And District 9 could have taken 3 years to get going, but that doesnt mean he has to wait around 3 years hoping for filming to start.  Lots of directors sign on for films 2-3 years in advance and then take jobs in the mean time.  In fact, many films were DELAYED because the director signed took a different job and they choose to wait a few months for scheduling. That is how things work in the movie industry.

So while I am clarifying, yes, I am aware of what a Hack is.  Urban Dictionary says &quot;a person who is a professional at doing some sort of service, but does crappy work. &quot; while dictionary.com says &quot;one who produces banal and mediocre work in the hope of gaining commercial success in the arts&quot;  So without ANY experience necessary to justify his role, I&#039;d have to say the shoe fits.

And I edited your post to remove the derogatory remarks.  If you want to continue discussing, that is fine.  I quite enjoy you enforcing my points.  However if you want to resort to name calling you will be banned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I suppose by making short films that display his techniques of special effects and 30 second commercial spots this makes him qualified to do a scifi tentpole feature film?</p>
<p>No.  It qualifies him to be on the effects team.</p>
<p>You are still proving my point. </p>
<p>And District 9 could have taken 3 years to get going, but that doesnt mean he has to wait around 3 years hoping for filming to start.  Lots of directors sign on for films 2-3 years in advance and then take jobs in the mean time.  In fact, many films were DELAYED because the director signed took a different job and they choose to wait a few months for scheduling. That is how things work in the movie industry.</p>
<p>So while I am clarifying, yes, I am aware of what a Hack is.  Urban Dictionary says &#8220;a person who is a professional at doing some sort of service, but does crappy work. &#8221; while dictionary.com says &#8220;one who produces banal and mediocre work in the hope of gaining commercial success in the arts&#8221;  So without ANY experience necessary to justify his role, I&#8217;d have to say the shoe fits.</p>
<p>And I edited your post to remove the derogatory remarks.  If you want to continue discussing, that is fine.  I quite enjoy you enforcing my points.  However if you want to resort to name calling you will be banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154122</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154122</guid>
		<description>Could it be that it has taken 3 years to get District 9 rolling? Could it? No, of course not, these things take no time at all. Of course he was sitting on his ass for 3 years doing nothing until Jackson handed him a project and told him to get shooting pronto. 
Of course. Cause that&#039;s how this business works.

What Jackson had proved was that he could do entertaining slapstick gore films. Tell me. In that scene in Meet The Feebles where the fly is eating shit with a spoon from a toilet bowl, did you think to yourself: Now that&#039;s the guy who should make Lord Of The Rings. Did you even think that with Heavenly Creatures? No you didn&#039;t and I&#039;m pretty damn sure you thought to yourself when news got out that he was going to direct them: &quot;Peter &quot;Bad Taste&quot; Jackson is going to direct LOTR? What the fuck?&quot;
That is if you knew who he was. Most people didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that it has taken 3 years to get District 9 rolling? Could it? No, of course not, these things take no time at all. Of course he was sitting on his ass for 3 years doing nothing until Jackson handed him a project and told him to get shooting pronto.<br />
Of course. Cause that&#8217;s how this business works.</p>
<p>What Jackson had proved was that he could do entertaining slapstick gore films. Tell me. In that scene in Meet The Feebles where the fly is eating shit with a spoon from a toilet bowl, did you think to yourself: Now that&#8217;s the guy who should make Lord Of The Rings. Did you even think that with Heavenly Creatures? No you didn&#8217;t and I&#8217;m pretty damn sure you thought to yourself when news got out that he was going to direct them: &#8220;Peter &#8220;Bad Taste&#8221; Jackson is going to direct LOTR? What the fuck?&#8221;<br />
That is if you knew who he was. Most people didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154097</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154097</guid>
		<description>Gutpunch.  I already said that it took 3 years for him to get a job.  And your response is &quot;Daddy Jackson got him a job just this year&quot;  Exactly.  NO ONE ELSE will give him a job.  If he was this amazing director why didnt someone else just scoop him up when Halo fell through.  Other directors get job offers when a project falls apart.  Why not this guy?  Thats right.  No experience.

Jackson had experience.  You just proved that.  Now name 5 feature that Neill Blomkamp has directed. 

You have proven my point.  Jackson HAD experience before he was handed LOTR.  Blomkamp has a few amateur films.  And ALL those guys you ranted on about climbed the ladder too.  They didnt get tentpoles on their first times out yet.

You are just proving my point.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gutpunch.  I already said that it took 3 years for him to get a job.  And your response is &#8220;Daddy Jackson got him a job just this year&#8221;  Exactly.  NO ONE ELSE will give him a job.  If he was this amazing director why didnt someone else just scoop him up when Halo fell through.  Other directors get job offers when a project falls apart.  Why not this guy?  Thats right.  No experience.</p>
<p>Jackson had experience.  You just proved that.  Now name 5 feature that Neill Blomkamp has directed. </p>
<p>You have proven my point.  Jackson HAD experience before he was handed LOTR.  Blomkamp has a few amateur films.  And ALL those guys you ranted on about climbed the ladder too.  They didnt get tentpoles on their first times out yet.</p>
<p>You are just proving my point.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154089</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154089</guid>
		<description>And did you think the same thing about Jackson, a director know for nothing but low budget aliens eating vomit, Muppets fucking, giant zombiefied mothers, lesbian killers and a psychic Michael J. Fox when he took on the even more massive Lord Of The Rings trilogy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And did you think the same thing about Jackson, a director know for nothing but low budget aliens eating vomit, Muppets fucking, giant zombiefied mothers, lesbian killers and a psychic Michael J. Fox when he took on the even more massive Lord Of The Rings trilogy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154086</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154086</guid>
		<description>Why do you automatically think that if he&#039;s not been attached to a feature project (that we know of) since the project died nobody is interested in him. If you actually looked you would know that he is directing a Sci-Fi film called DISTRICT 9 for Peter Jackson that&#039;s slated for next year.

This idiotic notion that nobody who hasn&#039;t directed a feature shouldn&#039;t be allowed to direct feature films is just bizarre and doesn&#039;t make one lick of sense.
And again I like to point towards other &quot;nobody&quot; &quot;hack&quot; commercial directors that sort of prove you wrong yet again. Ridley Scott, David Fincher, Michael Bay, Alex Proyas. All hack commercial directors who had never even delivered coffee on a movie set before directing their first groundbreaking feature films (well maybe not Bad Boys but you know what I mean). 

Millions of people have seen this man&#039;s work, they don&#039;t know his name but he has amazed people all over the world with his creations, including you Rodney.
And let&#039;s not forget that it has him that pretty much got the ball rolling for the Transformers film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you automatically think that if he&#8217;s not been attached to a feature project (that we know of) since the project died nobody is interested in him. If you actually looked you would know that he is directing a Sci-Fi film called DISTRICT 9 for Peter Jackson that&#8217;s slated for next year.</p>
<p>This idiotic notion that nobody who hasn&#8217;t directed a feature shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to direct feature films is just bizarre and doesn&#8217;t make one lick of sense.<br />
And again I like to point towards other &#8220;nobody&#8221; &#8220;hack&#8221; commercial directors that sort of prove you wrong yet again. Ridley Scott, David Fincher, Michael Bay, Alex Proyas. All hack commercial directors who had never even delivered coffee on a movie set before directing their first groundbreaking feature films (well maybe not Bad Boys but you know what I mean). </p>
<p>Millions of people have seen this man&#8217;s work, they don&#8217;t know his name but he has amazed people all over the world with his creations, including you Rodney.<br />
And let&#8217;s not forget that it has him that pretty much got the ball rolling for the Transformers film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154060</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154060</guid>
		<description>Its nothing personal.  It is just reality that people have taken this nobody, that if not for Peter Jackson sitting him on his lap NO ONE would have ever cared about.

Its not even hatred.  I just don&#039;t like to see nobody&#039;s getting jobs that established and experienced directors dont get just because someone makes a bullshit call while riding his own declining wave of popularity.  If Neill was as good as Peter said it wouldnt take him 3 years after the fact to get a job directing.  Everyone seemed to jump on the bandwagon and took some hack short films and some commercials and decided he was god?  Sorry.  He didnt impress me at all.

The studios wouldnt take a chance on him even with Peter waving his flag, and frankly the studios wouldnt take a chance with what Peter was smoking then anyways.  

My point about my trophies are that you attempt to give credit to Neill with the mention of his &quot;awards&quot; which are NOT for directing a feature film.

Sure, they give him some experience and someday this guy might accomplish something, but there is no reason to give this guy a film like Halo when all he has to claim for ACTUAL experience is some effects.

Give him an effects job.  He is qualified for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its nothing personal.  It is just reality that people have taken this nobody, that if not for Peter Jackson sitting him on his lap NO ONE would have ever cared about.</p>
<p>Its not even hatred.  I just don&#8217;t like to see nobody&#8217;s getting jobs that established and experienced directors dont get just because someone makes a bullshit call while riding his own declining wave of popularity.  If Neill was as good as Peter said it wouldnt take him 3 years after the fact to get a job directing.  Everyone seemed to jump on the bandwagon and took some hack short films and some commercials and decided he was god?  Sorry.  He didnt impress me at all.</p>
<p>The studios wouldnt take a chance on him even with Peter waving his flag, and frankly the studios wouldnt take a chance with what Peter was smoking then anyways.  </p>
<p>My point about my trophies are that you attempt to give credit to Neill with the mention of his &#8220;awards&#8221; which are NOT for directing a feature film.</p>
<p>Sure, they give him some experience and someday this guy might accomplish something, but there is no reason to give this guy a film like Halo when all he has to claim for ACTUAL experience is some effects.</p>
<p>Give him an effects job.  He is qualified for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154047</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/08/return-to-castle-wolfenstein-still-happening#comment-154047</guid>
		<description>Are those trophies and awards for directing professionally?
Still doesn&#039;t answer the question on why you insist on calling him a hack. 

Did he do something to you cause you are so fierce in your hatred against this guy. It boggles the mind. Especially since just about everything you&#039;ve said about him is wrong, especially that last sentence, so wrong on so many levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are those trophies and awards for directing professionally?<br />
Still doesn&#8217;t answer the question on why you insist on calling him a hack. </p>
<p>Did he do something to you cause you are so fierce in your hatred against this guy. It boggles the mind. Especially since just about everything you&#8217;ve said about him is wrong, especially that last sentence, so wrong on so many levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
