Comments on: “Shaken Not Stirred” Not In Quantum Of Solace http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:47:21 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: SF http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-169511 SF Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:19:27 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-169511 Apparently QoS is a Michael Bay movie! Oh no! http://volume124.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/quantum-of-solace-2008-dir-marc-forster-aka-michael-bay/ Apparently QoS is a Michael Bay movie! Oh no!

http://volume124.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/quantum-of-solace-2008-dir-marc-forster-aka-michael-bay/

]]> By: Zuke http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163306 Zuke Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:39:36 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163306 Looking forward to this film! Craig is the Bond to rule all others. He was even good in Golden Compass, which was kinda so-so! Looking forward to this film!

Craig is the Bond to rule all others. He was even good in Golden Compass, which was kinda so-so!

]]> By: Stevie http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163226 Stevie Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:30:57 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163226 I'm glad they decided to turn the page and go on. This is the new ass kicking bond. The gadgets as well as those two lines were old. I hope this pic is as good as the last. I’m glad they decided to turn the page and go on. This is the new ass kicking bond. The gadgets as well as those two lines were old. I hope this pic is as good as the last.

]]> By: Obi-wan kubrick http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163211 Obi-wan kubrick Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:47:26 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163211 I love both lines but in the end they are kinda cheesy and cliche after 46 years. I will be fine without them. I love both lines but in the end they are kinda cheesy and cliche after 46 years. I will be fine without them.

]]> By: Gordon Shumway http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163126 Gordon Shumway Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:52:56 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163126 I think it is just for publicity that they have old us these lines wont be in it. Its not the first film where he hasnt said the lines, hes says neither in From Russia With Love, and thats my favourite. I think it is just for publicity that they have old us these lines wont be in it. Its not the first film where he hasnt said the lines, hes says neither in From Russia With Love, and thats my favourite.

]]> By: DarthMuppet http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163028 DarthMuppet Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:59:33 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-163028 As long as they've made the best possible film about James Bond that they possibly could... I couldn't give two shits whether those lines are included or not. Also, as for the running time... the reason that Casino Royale had such a long running time was that it needed it to properly (re)introduce the character of James Bond and set up the story of how he became the hard-ass cynical bastard that we all love. Now that that's all out of the way, I have no problem with QOS being a much shorter film and cutting to the chase. As long as the movie is the proper length that it needs to be to tell the story it needs to tell... once again, I really couldn't give two shits about the shorter running time. As long as they’ve made the best possible film about James Bond that they possibly could… I couldn’t give two shits whether those lines are included or not.

Also, as for the running time… the reason that Casino Royale had such a long running time was that it needed it to properly (re)introduce the character of James Bond and set up the story of how he became the hard-ass cynical bastard that we all love. Now that that’s all out of the way, I have no problem with QOS being a much shorter film and cutting to the chase. As long as the movie is the proper length that it needs to be to tell the story it needs to tell… once again, I really couldn’t give two shits about the shorter running time.

]]> By: 790 http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162997 790 Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:38:41 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162997 Isn't this 2008, he could say "I'm fucking James Bond asshole!". Depending on the scene of course. ;-) The other phrase could be altered to "just pour the bloody shit, and don't stir it"... Course that could get the film a R rating. Hmmm what to do.?? Isn’t this 2008, he could say “I’m fucking James Bond asshole!”. Depending on the scene of course. ;-)

The other phrase could be altered to “just pour the bloody shit, and don’t stir it”…

Course that could get the film a R rating. Hmmm what to do.??

]]> By: twil http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162996 twil Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:35:48 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162996 they should have the lines although i agree john it's not that big of a deal. i do however, disagree about the title. i think its awesome. it adds suspense to the film. they should have the lines although i agree john it’s not that big of a deal. i do however, disagree about the title. i think its awesome. it adds suspense to the film.

]]> By: John http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162971 John Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:45:48 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162971 i'm glad - after a while, it starts to feel 'forced'. and besides, like you said john, it's all about the character. while the argument could be made that those lines are part of his character, i don't think the essence of who james bond is would feel the need to say these things all the time. i’m glad – after a while, it starts to feel ‘forced’. and besides, like you said john, it’s all about the character. while the argument could be made that those lines are part of his character, i don’t think the essence of who james bond is would feel the need to say these things all the time.

]]> By: Jon H http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162963 Jon H Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:32:13 +0000 http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/shaken-not-stirred-not-in-quantum-of-solace#comment-162963 As someone who is new to the franchise, this is kind of a bummer. I was among the many who stood up and gave it up when Craig said the final line in the last movie. Oh well. :/ As someone who is new to the franchise, this is kind of a bummer. I was among the many who stood up and gave it up when Craig said the final line in the last movie.

Oh well. :/

]]>