 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Star Wars isn&#8217;t Dead to me Yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:27:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nixon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161098</link>
		<dc:creator>Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161098</guid>
		<description>You know what ! I hate to post so many times in different post, on this website, I but i really love this website more everytime I vist !!!

Amazing article, I wish a news was this good...

But I just realize why Star Wars fans hate JarJar, because i actually didn;t mind him.  Back in the days, i forgot how serious star wars supposed to be as an epic... and with new ones is more like a disney or childish version of it....

Man I really gota respect you guys for having amazing article
Now question: Do I have a life ? :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what ! I hate to post so many times in different post, on this website, I but i really love this website more everytime I vist !!!</p>
<p>Amazing article, I wish a news was this good&#8230;</p>
<p>But I just realize why Star Wars fans hate JarJar, because i actually didn;t mind him.  Back in the days, i forgot how serious star wars supposed to be as an epic&#8230; and with new ones is more like a disney or childish version of it&#8230;.</p>
<p>Man I really gota respect you guys for having amazing article<br />
Now question: Do I have a life ? :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nixon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161094</link>
		<dc:creator>Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161094</guid>
		<description>Wow, they never made it for PC ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, they never made it for PC ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dzyak</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161081</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dzyak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161081</guid>
		<description>It is stated that Lucas is a great storyteller.  I disagree.  After spending far too much time of my limited life figuring out exactly what was so wrong with the Prequels, I (and many others) agree that Lucas has some &quot;great IDEAS,&quot; but he in no way is a great storyteller.  

What Lucas is excellent at is the broad strokes.  He innately knows what elements from history and pop-culture will strike a chord in audiences.  

What Lucas DOES NOT know is how to assemble those elements into a successful story.  Sure, he can outline it sort of.  But all it takes is to look at his filmmaking history to see that any successful (financially AND creatively) project that has his name attached was essentially written or &quot;fixed&quot; by qualified writers. 

THX was interesting, but still is pretty much a cult thing.  Graffiti, and Star Wars were fixed by Huyck and Katz before they were filmable.  ESB and ROTJ were expertly written by Kasdan.  The Indiana Jones series was written and directed by others and everything else that has the Lucas name attached (except the Star Wars Prequels) was written and executed by others.

Lucas CAN NOT write a story.  He is bad at it and admits to that fact.  The Prequels blew huge chunks because of Lucas&#039;s poor skills and his bullheadedness toward working with Mr. Darabont or any other &quot;union&quot; member (all because of his dispute with Universal over the cuts made on Graffiti.)  

Lucas gets to do whatever he wants because he has the money to do it.  He is the quintessential independent filmmaker, the position that everyone aspires to.  Lucas can pay for whatever he wants and can get any studio to distribute it under his terms.  But he squanders that privilege by not trusting the contributions and honest critiques of others.  

Lucas is NOT a great storyteller by any stretch, but he has the right IDEAS.  If he would learn and accept his own limitations and allow others who know how to do their jobs to do them, then there is little doubt that most projects with the Lucasfilm stamp would be given positive praise.  But instead, the only praise comes from Lucas apologists who have some bizarre reason to excuse the poor filmmaking in order to justify their continued fandom. 

Lucasfilm could have a flawless record, but for reasons unknown, it&#039;s very creator has little interest in creating great products, but instead gives priority to his ego, quality bedamned.

Of course as a Forbes List Billionaire, he doesn&#039;t have to give a sh**.  But for the fans who gave him that much money, it is disappointing to be let down so egregiously.

Lucas is NOT a great filmmaker.  He could be, but he chooses not to be.  Perhaps there is a lesson in there for all aspiring filmmakers who will leave their mark on the world.  Or maybe the next filmmaker who finds himself in Lucas&#039;s position will squander the success in the same way.  That&#039;s a choice for everyone to make everyday... will we do the right thing, or just do things to please ourselves?  We know what Lucas chose.  What will children learn from his example?  And does he care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is stated that Lucas is a great storyteller.  I disagree.  After spending far too much time of my limited life figuring out exactly what was so wrong with the Prequels, I (and many others) agree that Lucas has some &#8220;great IDEAS,&#8221; but he in no way is a great storyteller.  </p>
<p>What Lucas is excellent at is the broad strokes.  He innately knows what elements from history and pop-culture will strike a chord in audiences.  </p>
<p>What Lucas DOES NOT know is how to assemble those elements into a successful story.  Sure, he can outline it sort of.  But all it takes is to look at his filmmaking history to see that any successful (financially AND creatively) project that has his name attached was essentially written or &#8220;fixed&#8221; by qualified writers. </p>
<p>THX was interesting, but still is pretty much a cult thing.  Graffiti, and Star Wars were fixed by Huyck and Katz before they were filmable.  ESB and ROTJ were expertly written by Kasdan.  The Indiana Jones series was written and directed by others and everything else that has the Lucas name attached (except the Star Wars Prequels) was written and executed by others.</p>
<p>Lucas CAN NOT write a story.  He is bad at it and admits to that fact.  The Prequels blew huge chunks because of Lucas&#8217;s poor skills and his bullheadedness toward working with Mr. Darabont or any other &#8220;union&#8221; member (all because of his dispute with Universal over the cuts made on Graffiti.)  </p>
<p>Lucas gets to do whatever he wants because he has the money to do it.  He is the quintessential independent filmmaker, the position that everyone aspires to.  Lucas can pay for whatever he wants and can get any studio to distribute it under his terms.  But he squanders that privilege by not trusting the contributions and honest critiques of others.  </p>
<p>Lucas is NOT a great storyteller by any stretch, but he has the right IDEAS.  If he would learn and accept his own limitations and allow others who know how to do their jobs to do them, then there is little doubt that most projects with the Lucasfilm stamp would be given positive praise.  But instead, the only praise comes from Lucas apologists who have some bizarre reason to excuse the poor filmmaking in order to justify their continued fandom. </p>
<p>Lucasfilm could have a flawless record, but for reasons unknown, it&#8217;s very creator has little interest in creating great products, but instead gives priority to his ego, quality bedamned.</p>
<p>Of course as a Forbes List Billionaire, he doesn&#8217;t have to give a sh**.  But for the fans who gave him that much money, it is disappointing to be let down so egregiously.</p>
<p>Lucas is NOT a great filmmaker.  He could be, but he chooses not to be.  Perhaps there is a lesson in there for all aspiring filmmakers who will leave their mark on the world.  Or maybe the next filmmaker who finds himself in Lucas&#8217;s position will squander the success in the same way.  That&#8217;s a choice for everyone to make everyday&#8230; will we do the right thing, or just do things to please ourselves?  We know what Lucas chose.  What will children learn from his example?  And does he care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobaFett</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161053</link>
		<dc:creator>BobaFett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161053</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it once and I&#039;ve said it again.  The only reason that Star Wars is still alive today is because of the EU novels and Timothy Zahn.  

I&#039;d give my left nut to see a Thrawn trilogy with ...maybe Ridley Scott or maybe Wolfgang Peterson, or Peter Jackson as director.

However, put George Lucas in as thedriector  and...

You see what I did there?  

Shoot, I&#039;d love for Spielberg to direct too but GL is such a control freak...That&#039;s what I&#039;ve gleaned from the last 10 years in the SW universe.  Baron Papanooida is the Phantom Menace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it once and I&#8217;ve said it again.  The only reason that Star Wars is still alive today is because of the EU novels and Timothy Zahn.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d give my left nut to see a Thrawn trilogy with &#8230;maybe Ridley Scott or maybe Wolfgang Peterson, or Peter Jackson as director.</p>
<p>However, put George Lucas in as thedriector  and&#8230;</p>
<p>You see what I did there?  </p>
<p>Shoot, I&#8217;d love for Spielberg to direct too but GL is such a control freak&#8230;That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve gleaned from the last 10 years in the SW universe.  Baron Papanooida is the Phantom Menace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darek-T</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161003</link>
		<dc:creator>Darek-T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161003</guid>
		<description>I realy liked your insight with the whole &quot;let the disciples do the work&quot; and stuff because that is true, George Lucas should just be the guy that the &quot;disciples&quot; send the fax to to get his aproval on. and the fact that TFU is made like that is one of reasons it&#039;s probably gunna be so frikin good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realy liked your insight with the whole &#8220;let the disciples do the work&#8221; and stuff because that is true, George Lucas should just be the guy that the &#8220;disciples&#8221; send the fax to to get his aproval on. and the fact that TFU is made like that is one of reasons it&#8217;s probably gunna be so frikin good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAZMAT</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161000</link>
		<dc:creator>HAZMAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-161000</guid>
		<description>better then johns &quot;why star wars is dead to me&quot; post which made me want to punch the computer (ill always love star wars)

awsome post rodney

and i see someone brought up the force unleashed and...lol holy shit that game fucking rules (sorry..had to say it...someone brought it up)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>better then johns &#8220;why star wars is dead to me&#8221; post which made me want to punch the computer (ill always love star wars)</p>
<p>awsome post rodney</p>
<p>and i see someone brought up the force unleashed and&#8230;lol holy shit that game fucking rules (sorry..had to say it&#8230;someone brought it up)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160980</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160980</guid>
		<description>@Doug Douglas... no... It did not.  You chose to take two unrelated statements and make them conflict chronologically for the point of your joke.  

@Tobor.  I don&#039;t like someone other than the director choosing to change a movie for their benefit.  Like it or not, its not the fan&#039;s movie.  It belongs to George, he can do with it as he pleases.

@Treadstone.  Dude?   There is a book?????


I will be right back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Doug Douglas&#8230; no&#8230; It did not.  You chose to take two unrelated statements and make them conflict chronologically for the point of your joke.  </p>
<p>@Tobor.  I don&#8217;t like someone other than the director choosing to change a movie for their benefit.  Like it or not, its not the fan&#8217;s movie.  It belongs to George, he can do with it as he pleases.</p>
<p>@Treadstone.  Dude?   There is a book?????</p>
<p>I will be right back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treadstone</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160967</link>
		<dc:creator>Treadstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160967</guid>
		<description>Ok so I broke my rule and spoiled the Force Unleashed game by reading the book. upon finishing i had a tingling sensation run up my back and goosebumps on my arm. The story told in the TFU is not good. its not great. its phenominal. It takes all that we know and love in star wars and blends it together beautifully. i am ecstatic about seeing it play out before my eyes next week when the game releases. if this was to be made into a movie i think i would piss my pants in glee. infact it has the potential of being so good that i would forgive the godawful prequels. i think someone should start a petition to get this flick made. it really deserves it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so I broke my rule and spoiled the Force Unleashed game by reading the book. upon finishing i had a tingling sensation run up my back and goosebumps on my arm. The story told in the TFU is not good. its not great. its phenominal. It takes all that we know and love in star wars and blends it together beautifully. i am ecstatic about seeing it play out before my eyes next week when the game releases. if this was to be made into a movie i think i would piss my pants in glee. infact it has the potential of being so good that i would forgive the godawful prequels. i think someone should start a petition to get this flick made. it really deserves it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Douglas</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160961</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160961</guid>
		<description>Nonetheless, your phrasing left room for confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonetheless, your phrasing left room for confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobor68</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160948</link>
		<dc:creator>tobor68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/2008/09/why-star-wars-isnt-dead-to-me-yet#comment-160948</guid>
		<description>rodney, three words: The Phantom Edit. find it. watch it. better than you&#039;d think.

sorta redeems the second trilogy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rodney, three words: The Phantom Edit. find it. watch it. better than you&#8217;d think.</p>
<p>sorta redeems the second trilogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
