 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherlock Holmes Set Pics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:53:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166989</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166989</guid>
		<description>Well. I don&#039;t know if some of you have read the Sherlock Holmes books but, I don&#039;t think he ever wear a cap with two visors in the books nor has he ever smoke the pipe. The look that we know of him was created when they brought Sherlock Holmes to the screen in his earlier incarnations and it became canon after that. 

Maybe, for this movie, they wanted to go straight to the source for his look. Downy is ok except for the fact that Sherlock Holmes was tall and thin though in great shape. He was a master of disguise so, that might have been why they decided to put a hat on him in the first Sherlock Holmes movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. I don&#8217;t know if some of you have read the Sherlock Holmes books but, I don&#8217;t think he ever wear a cap with two visors in the books nor has he ever smoke the pipe. The look that we know of him was created when they brought Sherlock Holmes to the screen in his earlier incarnations and it became canon after that. </p>
<p>Maybe, for this movie, they wanted to go straight to the source for his look. Downy is ok except for the fact that Sherlock Holmes was tall and thin though in great shape. He was a master of disguise so, that might have been why they decided to put a hat on him in the first Sherlock Holmes movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricD</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166584</link>
		<dc:creator>EricD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166584</guid>
		<description>RDJ right now is probably my favorite actor. And I have always been a fan of Holmes books, movies and TV shows. But I just don&#039;t see RDJ as Sherlock Holmes and these pictures don&#039;t help. He looks more like Chaplin again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RDJ right now is probably my favorite actor. And I have always been a fan of Holmes books, movies and TV shows. But I just don&#8217;t see RDJ as Sherlock Holmes and these pictures don&#8217;t help. He looks more like Chaplin again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyson</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166572</link>
		<dc:creator>tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166572</guid>
		<description>it does look more efficient if he was wearing red coat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it does look more efficient if he was wearing red coat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahil</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166541</link>
		<dc:creator>Sahil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166541</guid>
		<description>Great Pics. They remind me of pictures from The Prestige.  Cant wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Pics. They remind me of pictures from The Prestige.  Cant wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166509</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166509</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s more pics here: 

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/movies/features/article_1436394.php/In_photos_Sherlock_Holmes_film_set_in_London?page=15

Edited to show real source. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s more pics here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.monstersandcritics.com/movies/features/article_1436394.php/In_photos_Sherlock_Holmes_film_set_in_London?page=15" rel="nofollow">http://www.monstersandcritics.com/movies/features/article_1436394.php/In_photos_Sherlock_Holmes_film_set_in_London?page=15</a></p>
<p>Edited to show real source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166492</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166492</guid>
		<description>Crazy question -- could this be Holmes in disguise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy question &#8212; could this be Holmes in disguise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Shumway</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166471</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Shumway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166471</guid>
		<description>Well by ditching the deerstalker and pipe they have gone back to the source novels, and it worked for Bond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well by ditching the deerstalker and pipe they have gone back to the source novels, and it worked for Bond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166465</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166465</guid>
		<description>I also agree, he looks more like Charles Chaplin, then the great detective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree, he looks more like Charles Chaplin, then the great detective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WesleyIII</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166448</link>
		<dc:creator>WesleyIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166448</guid>
		<description>No double-rimmed hat, no trenchcoat, and no pipe . . .  this is nuts . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No double-rimmed hat, no trenchcoat, and no pipe . . .  this is nuts . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/sherlock-holmes-set-pics#comment-166436</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=14817#comment-166436</guid>
		<description>Interesting take on the costume... Looks like they&#039;re going for a sort of eccentric-genius angle, with the badly fitting, slightly mismatched clothes. Not sure how well that fits Holmes though, I thought he was a bit sharper than your stereotypical mad scientist. I&#039;m going to hope Andrew&#039;s right that he&#039;s in disguise :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on the costume&#8230; Looks like they&#8217;re going for a sort of eccentric-genius angle, with the badly fitting, slightly mismatched clothes. Not sure how well that fits Holmes though, I thought he was a bit sharper than your stereotypical mad scientist. I&#8217;m going to hope Andrew&#8217;s right that he&#8217;s in disguise :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
