 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Farrelly Brothers to Remake the Three Stooges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:48:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-223097</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-223097</guid>
		<description>they make a part 2 of the three stooges I LIKE TO SEE robin willims to play shemp howard he funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they make a part 2 of the three stooges I LIKE TO SEE robin willims to play shemp howard he funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-223096</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-223096</guid>
		<description>play the part of curly  kevin james or frank caliendo or mark addy or jack black</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>play the part of curly  kevin james or frank caliendo or mark addy or jack black</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: War-Journalist</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170879</link>
		<dc:creator>War-Journalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170879</guid>
		<description>A permanen bath if I get my hands on them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A permanen bath if I get my hands on them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170739</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170739</guid>
		<description>Jeremy the point is that we accepted the slapstick from back then, but popculture has elevated simple slapstick into staged reality shows like Jackass.  

The type of people who might be amused by a pointless poke in the eye and then instant forgiveness after a retaliatory nose tweak will wonder why they are offering up such weak attacks.

Where is the shopping cart full of goat semen and rotting fish smashing into your groin?  Current trends just don&#039;t seem to be forgiving of old school classics when you try to blend the two.

The failure of the above mentioned Brady Bunch movies should be a clear sign.  The gag might be funny for a youtube video, but the studios are going to take a bath if they make that into a feature film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy the point is that we accepted the slapstick from back then, but popculture has elevated simple slapstick into staged reality shows like Jackass.  </p>
<p>The type of people who might be amused by a pointless poke in the eye and then instant forgiveness after a retaliatory nose tweak will wonder why they are offering up such weak attacks.</p>
<p>Where is the shopping cart full of goat semen and rotting fish smashing into your groin?  Current trends just don&#8217;t seem to be forgiving of old school classics when you try to blend the two.</p>
<p>The failure of the above mentioned Brady Bunch movies should be a clear sign.  The gag might be funny for a youtube video, but the studios are going to take a bath if they make that into a feature film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170734</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170734</guid>
		<description>Wish there was a way to edit posts.  &quot;They can’t take three look alikes, throw them in a kitchen where they proceed to bop each other on the head, pull noses, and poke each other in the eyes.&quot; was supposed to be a question.  And yes, there would obviously have to be a story to it, but that would just be a scene.  Like they are being chased for something so they duck into the kitchen and disguise themselves as cooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish there was a way to edit posts.  &#8220;They can’t take three look alikes, throw them in a kitchen where they proceed to bop each other on the head, pull noses, and poke each other in the eyes.&#8221; was supposed to be a question.  And yes, there would obviously have to be a story to it, but that would just be a scene.  Like they are being chased for something so they duck into the kitchen and disguise themselves as cooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170733</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170733</guid>
		<description>I do not get the &quot;CAN&#039;T&quot; do that in modern day shtick.  Do you still like the slapstick from back in the day?  They can&#039;t take three look alikes, throw them in a kitchen where they proceed to bop each other on the head, pull noses, and poke each other in the eyes.  Then while in the middle of their slapstick shenanigans have the Hell&#039;s Kitchen guy walk in and be like &quot;What the fuck is going on back here?&quot;  Could even have Curly do the sideways hand in front of nose eye poke block, then Moe use both hands to bypass the block.  If I remember right there was an episode similar to that, replace the Hell&#039;s Kitchen guy with some random irate restaurant owner obviously.  Sure this would all limit the audience to those that like that old school slap stick humor, but it is totally doable.  I am by far not interested in the a Three Stooges movie, but I also do not see any harm in it.  Another classic that I thought they did a decent job on making a remake of was The Adam&#039;s Family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not get the &#8220;CAN&#8217;T&#8221; do that in modern day shtick.  Do you still like the slapstick from back in the day?  They can&#8217;t take three look alikes, throw them in a kitchen where they proceed to bop each other on the head, pull noses, and poke each other in the eyes.  Then while in the middle of their slapstick shenanigans have the Hell&#8217;s Kitchen guy walk in and be like &#8220;What the fuck is going on back here?&#8221;  Could even have Curly do the sideways hand in front of nose eye poke block, then Moe use both hands to bypass the block.  If I remember right there was an episode similar to that, replace the Hell&#8217;s Kitchen guy with some random irate restaurant owner obviously.  Sure this would all limit the audience to those that like that old school slap stick humor, but it is totally doable.  I am by far not interested in the a Three Stooges movie, but I also do not see any harm in it.  Another classic that I thought they did a decent job on making a remake of was The Adam&#8217;s Family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170730</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170730</guid>
		<description>Well I thought the Dumb and Dumber movies were absolutely retarded.  Futhermore, they were NOTHING like the Three Stooges.

If they did some silly &quot;out of time&quot; Stooges Movie it would also be on par with Dumb and Dumber.  The point is that they CANT do a Stooges movie in a modern era and capture what made slapstick fun back then.

So they will rape it, and it will blow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I thought the Dumb and Dumber movies were absolutely retarded.  Futhermore, they were NOTHING like the Three Stooges.</p>
<p>If they did some silly &#8220;out of time&#8221; Stooges Movie it would also be on par with Dumb and Dumber.  The point is that they CANT do a Stooges movie in a modern era and capture what made slapstick fun back then.</p>
<p>So they will rape it, and it will blow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170728</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170728</guid>
		<description>I still do not see how it could harm the reputation.  If the person see&#039;s the remake without yet having seen the original and then hates it so much they do not want to see the original, more than likely they would not have seen the original in the first place had the remake not been made.  Therefore nothing has changed as far as the originals reputation goes since the person continues to not see it.  

As far as modernization of the Stooges.  I know these movies probably are not all that well liked, but I thought what they did with them on the remake was pretty hilarious: The Brady Bunch movies.  Taking this family from the 70s (?) and not changing them at all, then placing them in modern times.  It was funny as hell seeing how those two worlds collide.  They could do a similar story, not that they will, where the Stooges start off in black and white looking just like they did when they were first release, then fall into the clutches of a time machine again (see Meets Hercules) and end up in modern times and in color.  They could zap in and accidentally fumble a bank robbery or something, and end up with criminals and cops after them while they try to make it back to their own time.  Or something ridiculous like that.  But as I said, the director probably will not take this kind of approach and we will end up wit ha &quot;Dumb, Dumber, and Dumbest&quot; Three Stooges movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still do not see how it could harm the reputation.  If the person see&#8217;s the remake without yet having seen the original and then hates it so much they do not want to see the original, more than likely they would not have seen the original in the first place had the remake not been made.  Therefore nothing has changed as far as the originals reputation goes since the person continues to not see it.  </p>
<p>As far as modernization of the Stooges.  I know these movies probably are not all that well liked, but I thought what they did with them on the remake was pretty hilarious: The Brady Bunch movies.  Taking this family from the 70s (?) and not changing them at all, then placing them in modern times.  It was funny as hell seeing how those two worlds collide.  They could do a similar story, not that they will, where the Stooges start off in black and white looking just like they did when they were first release, then fall into the clutches of a time machine again (see Meets Hercules) and end up in modern times and in color.  They could zap in and accidentally fumble a bank robbery or something, and end up with criminals and cops after them while they try to make it back to their own time.  Or something ridiculous like that.  But as I said, the director probably will not take this kind of approach and we will end up wit ha &#8220;Dumb, Dumber, and Dumbest&#8221; Three Stooges movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: War-Journalist</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170667</link>
		<dc:creator>War-Journalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170667</guid>
		<description>I see your point(s) Jeremy. Of course no physical harm is done to originals by remakes, but reputation is affected. If a remake is terrible, then a new viewer will either believe that the original was just as bad, or have a little hope and seek it out. Most people lean towards the former. As regarding to my &quot;cover-up&quot; comment, I do see remakes as more or less replacements. Good movies can last quite a while(70 years in this case) in popularity. Of course,  movies involving a specific non-fictional event, such as WW2, usually have the plot based around the event &amp; can be made or remade simply to keep the film alive, but keep the same things that made up the original. Anything NOT serving a historical point is generally not supposed to be subject to change, because it can serve so many generations. Granted things have obviously changed since the 30&#039;s, but the Stooges never really drew attention to it. There was never a movie called &quot;The Three Stooges Meet Hitler&quot;, etc. A property like Trasformers serves all cultures. Now a property where Transformers are built to fight Nazis would not really translate well as a remake. Films show culture and the state of the place in which they&#039;re made whether they want to or not, and I believe that films that cater to that culture specifically should not be remade. By this time I believe I have muddled my point, so I&#039;ll return to it. I believe that the Stooges were/are the Stooges, and that they, or any other property, should not be changed to fit new culture, hence updated/remade. People and fans from when the Stooges were valid can keep on enjoying, but if the Stooges are not valid enough to service the new generation, then that&#039;s all there is to it. You and I both know that a new movie would fundamentally change the Stooge formula to fit this generation&#039;s standard of comedy, which is quite different than that of the 30&#039;s. I do not think they should be altered to flow with the times if the times have changed enough to make them obsolete. A movie like &quot;The Fifth Element&quot; would be fine as a remake becuase it is about an unknown future. A movie like &quot;The Valley of Elah&quot;(great flick) could not be updated because it deals with American culture during our war with the Middle East, and would not apply to the future of 2037 or whathaveyou. Batman Begins &amp; The Dark Knight are not culture specific and probably could apply in 2037 because we never mention or make a point of our political or military status in those films. I suppose that the stooges should not be updated simply because they would be changed beyond recognition of the originals. I love the Stooges and hate Jackass, and I&#039;m sure there are variations out there, but I could not stand the Stooges approaching that kind of material which more or less represents modern humor. Think as you wish, but that&#039;s my mind about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point(s) Jeremy. Of course no physical harm is done to originals by remakes, but reputation is affected. If a remake is terrible, then a new viewer will either believe that the original was just as bad, or have a little hope and seek it out. Most people lean towards the former. As regarding to my &#8220;cover-up&#8221; comment, I do see remakes as more or less replacements. Good movies can last quite a while(70 years in this case) in popularity. Of course,  movies involving a specific non-fictional event, such as WW2, usually have the plot based around the event &amp; can be made or remade simply to keep the film alive, but keep the same things that made up the original. Anything NOT serving a historical point is generally not supposed to be subject to change, because it can serve so many generations. Granted things have obviously changed since the 30&#8217;s, but the Stooges never really drew attention to it. There was never a movie called &#8220;The Three Stooges Meet Hitler&#8221;, etc. A property like Trasformers serves all cultures. Now a property where Transformers are built to fight Nazis would not really translate well as a remake. Films show culture and the state of the place in which they&#8217;re made whether they want to or not, and I believe that films that cater to that culture specifically should not be remade. By this time I believe I have muddled my point, so I&#8217;ll return to it. I believe that the Stooges were/are the Stooges, and that they, or any other property, should not be changed to fit new culture, hence updated/remade. People and fans from when the Stooges were valid can keep on enjoying, but if the Stooges are not valid enough to service the new generation, then that&#8217;s all there is to it. You and I both know that a new movie would fundamentally change the Stooge formula to fit this generation&#8217;s standard of comedy, which is quite different than that of the 30&#8217;s. I do not think they should be altered to flow with the times if the times have changed enough to make them obsolete. A movie like &#8220;The Fifth Element&#8221; would be fine as a remake becuase it is about an unknown future. A movie like &#8220;The Valley of Elah&#8221;(great flick) could not be updated because it deals with American culture during our war with the Middle East, and would not apply to the future of 2037 or whathaveyou. Batman Begins &amp; The Dark Knight are not culture specific and probably could apply in 2037 because we never mention or make a point of our political or military status in those films. I suppose that the stooges should not be updated simply because they would be changed beyond recognition of the originals. I love the Stooges and hate Jackass, and I&#8217;m sure there are variations out there, but I could not stand the Stooges approaching that kind of material which more or less represents modern humor. Think as you wish, but that&#8217;s my mind about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/11/farrelly-brothers-to-remake-the-three-stooges#comment-170547</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=15482#comment-170547</guid>
		<description>@ War-Journalist

I would have to disagree with you.  Remakes are not cover ups.  If anything they revive the original.  Take a person that has never heard of the original.  A remake is done, now one of four things can happen:

1. The person does not see the remake, and continues living in ignorance of the original. So in reality nothing changes.

2. The person sees it not knowing it is a remake, and continues living in ignorance of the original.  So in reality nothing changes.

3. The person sees it and sometime before, during, or after the person discovers it is a remake.  They choose not to see the original for whatever reason.

4. The person sees it and sometime before, during, or after the person discovers it is a remake.  They hunt out the original to see.

There may be a few other outcomes such as they see the original because the remake brought to light an original and they see that instead of the remake, but will go off these four aforementioned outcomes.  The first thing to point out is that in none of these outcomes is there any harm done in regard to the reputation of the original.  We are talking about a person that has never heard of the original; therefore, the first three outcomes result in the continuation of the person not seeing it for whatever reason.  Thus the original remains in it&#039;s current state of neither growing in popularity or diminishing.  On the other hand, the fourth outcome results in a new viewer.  They may like it or they may not, either way it resulted in the person seeking it out and watching it.  That is all personal opinion, for what is one man&#039;s trash is another man&#039;s treasure.  If the person saw the remake and hated it, so when finding out about the original does not see it because the remake sucked.  It still does not degrade the value of the original.  It pretty much remains in the same state.  This can be argued I am sure, but I do not want to get into that.  In the end I still do not think the remake can do any harm to the original.  It either leaves in the same state prior to the remake being released or it opens new doors to the original.  

By the way, Indy 4 did not bring back the original three to DVD.  I bought the original three box set about four years prior to the Crystal Skull even being announced as being in production.  The DVDs have been for sale and on the shelves of most places since it&#039;s release on DVD, the Crystal Skull only added one more movie to the set.  If the Three Stooges do get a remake, then I will not be surprised at all if it gets any publicity that stores will start stocking the originals on DVD once again.  Re-releasing originals prior to a remake&#039;s release is only good business sense as it is just another form of advertisements.  I was shocked looking on Netflix&#039;s instant viewable movies to find The Day the Earth Stood Still, and I bet that would not be on their list if it was not for the fact that a remake is coming out in the near future.  I am not looking forward to a remake of the Three Stooges, but if it is done I see no harm to the originals being committed.  If anything, a few new fans may come from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ War-Journalist</p>
<p>I would have to disagree with you.  Remakes are not cover ups.  If anything they revive the original.  Take a person that has never heard of the original.  A remake is done, now one of four things can happen:</p>
<p>1. The person does not see the remake, and continues living in ignorance of the original. So in reality nothing changes.</p>
<p>2. The person sees it not knowing it is a remake, and continues living in ignorance of the original.  So in reality nothing changes.</p>
<p>3. The person sees it and sometime before, during, or after the person discovers it is a remake.  They choose not to see the original for whatever reason.</p>
<p>4. The person sees it and sometime before, during, or after the person discovers it is a remake.  They hunt out the original to see.</p>
<p>There may be a few other outcomes such as they see the original because the remake brought to light an original and they see that instead of the remake, but will go off these four aforementioned outcomes.  The first thing to point out is that in none of these outcomes is there any harm done in regard to the reputation of the original.  We are talking about a person that has never heard of the original; therefore, the first three outcomes result in the continuation of the person not seeing it for whatever reason.  Thus the original remains in it&#8217;s current state of neither growing in popularity or diminishing.  On the other hand, the fourth outcome results in a new viewer.  They may like it or they may not, either way it resulted in the person seeking it out and watching it.  That is all personal opinion, for what is one man&#8217;s trash is another man&#8217;s treasure.  If the person saw the remake and hated it, so when finding out about the original does not see it because the remake sucked.  It still does not degrade the value of the original.  It pretty much remains in the same state.  This can be argued I am sure, but I do not want to get into that.  In the end I still do not think the remake can do any harm to the original.  It either leaves in the same state prior to the remake being released or it opens new doors to the original.  </p>
<p>By the way, Indy 4 did not bring back the original three to DVD.  I bought the original three box set about four years prior to the Crystal Skull even being announced as being in production.  The DVDs have been for sale and on the shelves of most places since it&#8217;s release on DVD, the Crystal Skull only added one more movie to the set.  If the Three Stooges do get a remake, then I will not be surprised at all if it gets any publicity that stores will start stocking the originals on DVD once again.  Re-releasing originals prior to a remake&#8217;s release is only good business sense as it is just another form of advertisements.  I was shocked looking on Netflix&#8217;s instant viewable movies to find The Day the Earth Stood Still, and I bet that would not be on their list if it was not for the fact that a remake is coming out in the near future.  I am not looking forward to a remake of the Three Stooges, but if it is done I see no harm to the originals being committed.  If anything, a few new fans may come from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
