Comments on: Hancock 2 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2 The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:09:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: will http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-186566 will Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:35:33 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-186566 hancock u good than u turn bad wah up with that hancock u good than u turn bad wah up with that

]]> By: Hancock 2 Trailer http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-183716 Hancock 2 Trailer Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:55:36 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-183716 I'd like to know more about the origins of hancock! that'd be great for the second flick. I’d like to know more about the origins of hancock! that’d be great for the second flick.

]]> By: gerardo http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-183609 gerardo Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:27:15 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-183609 heres my idea hancock 2. everything is all good him saving the day the city is in order all of a sudden unexplainable crimes or destruction goes on. only to find out that there is 1 hancock type of person left in the world or universe and he's mad/jealous cus hancock and that blonde are the only couple alive and his partner lady died defending hancock/blondy. they get it on and that evil guy is beating them down individualy but together they take him down yet getting weaker at the same time and with her final strength the girl saves hancock not the other way around. something like that heres my idea hancock 2. everything is all good him saving the day the city is in order all of a sudden unexplainable crimes or destruction goes on. only to find out that there is 1 hancock type of person left in the world or universe and he’s mad/jealous cus hancock and that blonde are the only couple alive and his partner lady died defending hancock/blondy. they get it on and that evil guy is beating them down individualy but together they take him down yet getting weaker at the same time and with her final strength the girl saves hancock not the other way around. something like that

]]> By: Ton3nee http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-179232 Ton3nee Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:04:11 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-179232 They need to come out with "Hancock 2", It's a good movie, almost better then most marvel or D.C. movies. Now all they need to do for "Hancock 2" is to explain his orgin. But still have some good action,.With out messing up the story or over doing it, or should i say without any of that hollywood extra or twist of what they think is so called "HOT" or a better way of puting it, what THEY think would sell. What im saying is if they do make a secound "Hancock 2", then keep the characters the same way they should be. ORIGINAL. AND KEEP THE IDEA OR "WHAT A SUPER HERO WOULD REALY DOOO".P.S.I KNOW YA'll SEEN WHAT THEY DID ON X-MEN. THEY FUCKED UP JUGGERNUT. THEY NEW COSTUME FOR THE CHARACTER WAS ENOUGH. BUT HOW THEY DID JUGGERNUT. THAT WAS WRONG. AND THEY GOES FOR SOME OF THE OTHER CHARECTERS TOO. They need to come out with “Hancock 2″, It’s a good movie, almost better then most marvel or D.C. movies. Now all they need to do for “Hancock 2″ is to explain his orgin. But still have some good action,.With out messing up the story or over doing it, or should i say without any of that hollywood extra or twist of what they think is so called “HOT” or a better way of puting it, what THEY think would sell. What im saying is if they do make a secound “Hancock 2″, then keep the characters the same way they should be. ORIGINAL. AND KEEP THE IDEA OR “WHAT A SUPER HERO WOULD REALY DOOO”.P.S.I KNOW YA’ll SEEN WHAT THEY DID ON X-MEN. THEY FUCKED UP JUGGERNUT. THEY NEW COSTUME FOR THE CHARACTER WAS ENOUGH. BUT HOW THEY DID JUGGERNUT. THAT WAS WRONG. AND THEY GOES FOR SOME OF THE OTHER CHARECTERS TOO.

]]> By: Movies DBs http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-175204 Movies DBs Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:18:01 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-175204 The events of the second-half are entertaining, don\'t get me wrong, it\'s dead at whatever time the first-half has passed, it feels as again the loll relative to the underacted was disinterestedly thrown together and it feels awfully rushed. Hancock is definitely an satisfying starstruck but it\'s gap relating to uniformity during it\'s second-half and dodgy runtime in relation with 92 minutes practice it is inept to particularly implement it\'s highly potential concept. In my eyes, Hancock is indeedy what me would define so a \"blockbuster\". As bottomless a cryptographer has abbreviated out, the first quantum in connection with hancock is great: the plot flows well, hancock\'s character is developed very soundly and the spoofs are genuinely amusing. Spectacle is burning and the three lead characters are inclusive developed very well. It is an not kosher idea, it\'s moves packed, funny, possesses a sound cast, it is infested with special effects and, generally, has that \"blockbuster\" feel nigh it. But, fervor i mentioned before, Hancock is an good movie. . Typical stock-in-trade are implicit and accurately notate the results speaking of Hancock\'s recklessness. I myself is often pointed out though, that the second-half pertinent to hancock is what lets inner man down. In spite of a concept as. The events of the second-half are entertaining, don\’t get me wrong, it\’s dead at whatever time the first-half has passed, it feels as again the loll relative to the underacted was disinterestedly thrown together and it feels awfully rushed. Hancock is definitely an satisfying starstruck but it\’s gap relating to uniformity during it\’s second-half and dodgy runtime in relation with 92 minutes practice it is inept to particularly implement it\’s highly potential concept. In my eyes, Hancock is indeedy what me would define so a \”blockbuster\”. As bottomless a cryptographer has abbreviated out, the first quantum in connection with hancock is great: the plot flows well, hancock\’s character is developed very soundly and the spoofs are genuinely amusing. Spectacle is burning and the three lead characters are inclusive developed very well. It is an not kosher idea, it\’s moves packed, funny, possesses a sound cast, it is infested with special effects and, generally, has that \”blockbuster\” feel nigh it. But, fervor i mentioned before, Hancock is an good movie. . Typical stock-in-trade are implicit and accurately notate the results speaking of Hancock\’s recklessness. I myself is often pointed out though, that the second-half pertinent to hancock is what lets inner man down. In spite of a concept as.

]]> By: oliver http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-175065 oliver Sun, 07 Dec 2008 00:13:15 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-175065 the unexplored characters are probably the super powered people that are already dead. will smith will probably start remembering his past or something like that and delve into them say when they were the greek gods or something. maybe a couple of them are villains too. who knows. i say there is alot that could come from a sequel and am game to find out what that might be. plus they could have other powers too like the women did in the film. more things to think about. if they do it right, it could be a very fun film the unexplored characters are probably the super powered people that are already dead. will smith will probably start remembering his past or something like that and delve into them say when they were the greek gods or something. maybe a couple of them are villains too. who knows. i say there is alot that could come from a sequel and am game to find out what that might be. plus they could have other powers too like the women did in the film. more things to think about. if they do it right, it could be a very fun film

]]> By: Catarina http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174857 Catarina Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:43:05 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174857 it will take at least 2 or 3 years.. i bet it.. wich it sucks.. it will take at least 2 or 3 years.. i bet it.. wich it sucks..

]]> By: Catarina http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174854 Catarina Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:29:06 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174854 yeah but.. it can take that long.. will said in a few years.. it's possible.. i think it can take that long.. but if it takes that long, that will be awful.. really awful.. and they haven't even started it.. so... yeah but.. it can take that long.. will said in a few years.. it’s possible..
i think it can take that long.. but if it takes that long, that will be awful.. really awful.. and they haven’t even started it.. so…

]]> By: Catarina http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174852 Catarina Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:28:20 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174852 yeah but.. it can take that long.. will said in a few years.. it's possible.. i think it can take that long.. but if it takes that long, that will be awful.. really awful.. yeah but.. it can take that long.. will said in a few years.. it’s possible..
i think it can take that long.. but if it takes that long, that will be awful.. really awful..

]]> By: DG Music http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174842 DG Music Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:10:57 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/2008/12/hancock-2#comment-174842 @ Kristina hehe... funneh :P @ Kristina

hehe… funneh :P

]]>