 


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spy Footage Claims to be on Ghostbusters 3 Set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:53:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HAZMAT</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180768</link>
		<dc:creator>HAZMAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180768</guid>
		<description>lmo did you hear him?

&quot;hey whats that!?&quot;
&quot;wha- nothing!&quot;

xD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lmo did you hear him?</p>
<p>&#8220;hey whats that!?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;wha- nothing!&#8221;</p>
<p>xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180738</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180738</guid>
		<description>Nothing needs &quot;breaking to us&quot; there Agliarept..

We presumed if this had anything at all to do with Ghostbusters that it would have been for the game.

Or not Ghostbusters at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing needs &#8220;breaking to us&#8221; there Agliarept..</p>
<p>We presumed if this had anything at all to do with Ghostbusters that it would have been for the game.</p>
<p>Or not Ghostbusters at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agliarept</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180737</link>
		<dc:creator>agliarept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180737</guid>
		<description>Hi, sorry to break ti to your guys but this is for the game. Its simple, fine im a nerd, anyway in the GB game monsters can be formed from different objects and you have to kill them/trap them to move on. Hence this shitty monster in the video. So yea, this is a ghosbusters video being shot, FOR THE GAME. its the commercial or in game footage. but it is for the game, look up videos about the game and you will see exactly the same thing. i know this to be true 100% thanks for reading me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, sorry to break ti to your guys but this is for the game. Its simple, fine im a nerd, anyway in the GB game monsters can be formed from different objects and you have to kill them/trap them to move on. Hence this shitty monster in the video. So yea, this is a ghosbusters video being shot, FOR THE GAME. its the commercial or in game footage. but it is for the game, look up videos about the game and you will see exactly the same thing. i know this to be true 100% thanks for reading me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180732</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180732</guid>
		<description>The only thing we have to go on saying this is Ghostbusters (or related, they might be doing a commercial for the video game due out this summer) is that the &quot;spy&quot; said they were on the set of Ghostbusters 3.

Nothing else -including the fact that the script hasn&#039;t been approved - suggests that this is actually ghostbusters.

@Bobby... if someone WAS taking spy footage this is exactly how I would suspect it would look.  I dont think that exposes it as fake.  Lots of hidden cams use a fisheye lense to compensate for the lack of real ability to aim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing we have to go on saying this is Ghostbusters (or related, they might be doing a commercial for the video game due out this summer) is that the &#8220;spy&#8221; said they were on the set of Ghostbusters 3.</p>
<p>Nothing else -including the fact that the script hasn&#8217;t been approved &#8211; suggests that this is actually ghostbusters.</p>
<p>@Bobby&#8230; if someone WAS taking spy footage this is exactly how I would suspect it would look.  I dont think that exposes it as fake.  Lots of hidden cams use a fisheye lense to compensate for the lack of real ability to aim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDpunk</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180721</link>
		<dc:creator>HDpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180721</guid>
		<description>theres nothing even in it to suggest its a ghostbusters movie, show me the Ecto-1 driving by or someone in a ghostbusters suit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theres nothing even in it to suggest its a ghostbusters movie, show me the Ecto-1 driving by or someone in a ghostbusters suit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180709</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180709</guid>
		<description>The camera with the fake fish eye lens gives it away? It&#039;s a camera with a fish eye lens, what&#039;s fake about that?

I just think it&#039;s not Ghostbusters 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The camera with the fake fish eye lens gives it away? It&#8217;s a camera with a fish eye lens, what&#8217;s fake about that?</p>
<p>I just think it&#8217;s not Ghostbusters 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180683</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180683</guid>
		<description>Fake guys, the camera with the fake fish eye gives it away and then the guy noticing randomly the camera, not to mention it&#039;s too well cut and not enough jumpy imo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake guys, the camera with the fake fish eye gives it away and then the guy noticing randomly the camera, not to mention it&#8217;s too well cut and not enough jumpy imo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180682</guid>
		<description>Oh boy, here comes the &quot;Cloverfield&quot; viral marketing campaign guys, they are at it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, here comes the &#8220;Cloverfield&#8221; viral marketing campaign guys, they are at it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gutpunch</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180640</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutpunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180640</guid>
		<description>Fake. Probably Transformers 2 if anything.

It would be pretty lame if there was a need for a giant monster in every Ghostbuster film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake. Probably Transformers 2 if anything.</p>
<p>It would be pretty lame if there was a need for a giant monster in every Ghostbuster film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yamo</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/spy-footage-claims-to-be-on-ghostbusters-3-set#comment-180639</link>
		<dc:creator>Yamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themovieblog.com/?p=16770#comment-180639</guid>
		<description>Fake this is a allstate commercial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake this is a allstate commercial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
