Comments on: Marsters and Wong Explain changes for Dragonball Evolution

By: kapon

kapon — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:59:47 +0000

DRaGONball evolution was great and it seems cool and looks like a better mortal kombat in my eyes, seven balls must be found or all man’s face will be bound, it doesn’t get any serious or adventures than that.

By: C*

C* — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:15:38 +0000

just look on IMDB to what the director and writer have done, and its basicaly nothing but ‘kak’ – its my new favourite word. Well if they cant even do the trailer correctly then what hope do we have for the film , and i havnt made anything up – EVOLUTION is a retarded title, its PG so its for children its nothing more than a glorified cartoon, when if done correctly, could of been a dark film with a very successfull franchise and many other films to follow.I wont dare tell my friends i am a dragon ball fan because id be rediculed and ashamed by the ‘kak’ which was pumped out of Wong and 20thc.Fox’s collective asse’s. I think Wong said that he didnt want to have a kid play Goku against Picolo so they gave the role to an adult, if they wanted it to be a proper action all stars and muscles then there are other more interesting storylines in the DB series which are far more interesting than there sperm coloured picolo.

And you say i cant slate the film, well i can and i am! to cry me a river if you dont like it.

And plus i never was a big fan of the Street fighter franchise but: ‘Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li’ looks far more interesting and slighlty better made. and the title is less retarded ‘The Legend’ sounds far more interesting than ‘Evolution’.

DB will just fade away in DVD bin, it will be lucky if it makes it to blu-ray!

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:14:39 +0000

It IS ignorance to assume that because of some pattern that you invented and a studio you don’t like means this film IS bad. You haven’t seen it.

NOTHING you say at this point can justify you ASSUMING the movie is bad when you have no proof that it will live up to your prejudice over the studio and your impressions of the trailer.

A bad trailer can kill a movie’s buzz and that doesn’t mean its a bad movie. It means its a bad trailer. There have been movies I don’t care about at all after seeing a trailer turn into movies I love, and trailers that looked incredible only leading me to a movie that I cannot stand.

You might want to read your over long and repetitive comment above and tell me how every time you make an assuming statement without proof is nothing short of an assumption???

You cant.

I dont have to prove you wrong, you did it yourself.

You can’t know this movie will be as bad as you are assuming it will be simply because you haven’t seen it.

Fine, you dont WANT to like this movie. Your call. But it doesnt mean your presumptions are facts.

By: C*

C* — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:49:34 +0000

its not ignorance when there is a pattern to how hollywood films operate, specially to how 20th century fox does films, an inexperienced director&writer given big ish budget, its gona be a flop, if you want the film to do well you give it a crew which is experienced with that kinda job,big director&writer will bring the masses in and make more money and help the survival of the franchise then maybe you give an inexperienced crew the sequel but not the flagship film, 20th century fox are not respecting what Toriyama has built, hell i dont even like where he is going with the GT series, specialy when he said he was going to stop the dragonball series 10years ago and work on something else.And thats what they are doing because the kids are more familiar with the GT series then they made a film wich differs from the original story line. FOX should stick to making tv for the heards of people. And WTF is with the reatarded title EVOLUTION, that is the lamest title in the world no good film has ever existed with Evolution in the title, if it was DBZ a sequel movie then Evolution would fit [still retarded] but as a first in a series trying to appeal to the unaware. Now please dont give me no bull crap like ‘dont judge a book by its cover’ because trailers are very giving. Hell i wont go and c it because they made it for kids a PG hell batman and tomb raider were a 12. Ergo its gonna be crap, just a junked up firwork display of a toy advert, lets hop that all the kids will have their DBZ goodies for x-mas. Fox aint getting my money for that piss poor attempt. And as i said before i have been waiting for this film for 15years i prob know a hell of alot more than you about it. When the cast came out it didnt look promising but i was prepared to wait till the trailer, now its out they can expect alot of noise from me on every blog out there lol like i can be bothered. and its fun talking to touchy people like you who thinks the world is pink and everything should be given a chance lol life is too short ‘irony i know i am on a blog’ trailer is shit = film will be shit! life is so simple

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:55:21 +0000

I don’t have to prove you wrong.

You are ASSUMING it will be bad because you don’t like the director, you cant seem to understand that a direct translation would be retarded looking and you are not happy with the adaptation.

But you might watch it, and it might be good anyways. You don’t know that.

Where your ignorance lies “you tit” is that you already say the movie IS crap and you can’t even know that. You might not like how its shaping up, or even be impressed with what is already shown, but you can’t know that the movie is crap before you have even seen it.

This might be the worst movie EVER and I wont hesitate to say so if it is once I see it. But I won’t jump the bandwagon and let someone who jumps to conclusions just because Fox is making it that say its automatically bad. That is ignorant.

By: C*

C* — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:48:40 +0000

LOL the fact that 20th century fox made it is sufficient for my judgement. they are rapping the franchise just to make a quick buck. and just looking at the trailer makes me sick, and please its one thing for me to insult that film because it looks terrible, the story line has nothing to do with the original manga series, but its an other to insult me in callin me ignorant, you tit! James Wong is the director and he is the king of KAK! hell if James Cameron
had dont it there would of been hope. This iteration / incarnation of DBZ is an americanised bull shit with a crap director and a paphetic writer. now please proove me wrong!

By: Rodney

Rodney — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:19:24 +0000

And you have SEEN this movie already? How do you know its “kak” when you havent even seen the movie.

You can say you are not hopeful about this, but to already assume it will be garbage when you havent watched the movie is ignorant.

By: C*

C* — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:58:33 +0000

Hell i wont even bother pointing out the obviouse, that film is just Kak!!! I have read the Manga series a million times since i was 8 and for 15years i have been waiting for the film and this the sh*t 20th fox pulls out of its ass, 99% of the fan base are well in the 20’s and they make it a PG a f*cking PG!!! its embarrassing for the fans fuck it its an insult, I wont even download it. Peace

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:44:59 +0000

Shaolin Vs Llama has been on my shelf for the better part of two decades Finaljoe. I am well aware of how much ass a drunken master can kick.

But the hokey behaviour that is a staple among Kung-Fu cinema just doesn’t fly in north american films. If this was Kung-Fu Cinema, I would have no issues with hokey or over acting characters. But this is a North American release targeted at a North American audience.

And the drunken master would own Hawaiian shirt wearing hokey Roshi while still dishing noodles past his uncanny long beard and ’stach!

At least this movie version of Roshi looks like he could hold his own or win against a Kung-Fu Drunken master.

If you dare challenge my Kung-Fu Cimema knowledge again I will beat you with the staff of insolence.

By: finaljoe

finaljoe — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:04:38 +0000

“This is an adaptation. Yes, Roshi serves a purpose. But making him a believable teacher/mentor is not a bad thing. You presume that they should have got a crackpot zany old man to play Roshi so we can spend the movie rolling our eyes at him? You said it yourself, Roshi can kick ass.. so why is it so bad that they made that believable?”

Clearly you haven’t seen Drunken Master which proves beyond question that an old zany, crazy man can indeed kick mucho ass.