<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Inglourious Basterds Posters Online	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rodney		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17580#comment-185705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185652&quot;&gt;Anthony T&lt;/a&gt;.

Well then its a good thing this isnt a remake of Inglorious Bastards. 

Tarantino already made it clear that he liked the sound of the name and it has NOTHING to do with the Italian film.  

This is original and aside from the similarity of the names (which he spelled wrong on purpose) there is no connection.  Not a remake or a sequel.  

So your theory falls a little flat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185652">Anthony T</a>.</p>
<p>Well then its a good thing this isnt a remake of Inglorious Bastards. </p>
<p>Tarantino already made it clear that he liked the sound of the name and it has NOTHING to do with the Italian film.  </p>
<p>This is original and aside from the similarity of the names (which he spelled wrong on purpose) there is no connection.  Not a remake or a sequel.  </p>
<p>So your theory falls a little flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony T		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17580#comment-185652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am slowly becoming a non-Tarantino fan. I saw the original Inglorious BastArds and it was ok. Tarantino is becoming the &quot;other&quot; cult version of Tim Burton. Different being is Tarantino is drawing from original trash to create something just as bad as the original, while Burton is remaking the original into something new and trashy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am slowly becoming a non-Tarantino fan. I saw the original Inglorious BastArds and it was ok. Tarantino is becoming the &#8220;other&#8221; cult version of Tim Burton. Different being is Tarantino is drawing from original trash to create something just as bad as the original, while Burton is remaking the original into something new and trashy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 3R!C		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185585</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3R!C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17580#comment-185585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shouldn&#039;t it say the 6th film from quentin tarantino?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t it say the 6th film from quentin tarantino?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: THE FOOL ON THE HILL		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE FOOL ON THE HILL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17580#comment-185560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All his movies are great, this will be the movie of the decade.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All his movies are great, this will be the movie of the decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17580#comment-185547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think this movie looks great and i don&#039;t really like Tarantino that much so KILL HITLA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this movie looks great and i don&#8217;t really like Tarantino that much so KILL HITLA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: probitionate		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/02/new-inglourious-basterds-posters-online/#comment-185543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[probitionate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17580#comment-185543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having read the supposed script, my answers would be 

a) Yes, there is more to it than that, and
b) No, it doesn&#039;t. 

And I&#039;m not even a Tarantino fan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the supposed script, my answers would be </p>
<p>a) Yes, there is more to it than that, and<br />
b) No, it doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not even a Tarantino fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
