Comments on: Rodney’s X-Men Origins:Wolverine Review

By: Ty

Ty — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:27:04 +0000

Oh yeah…soooooo bad.

That happened a few times throughout the movie.

By: AARON

AARON — Mon, 25 May 2009 18:03:48 +0000

Second time’s the charm, because I liked it better a lot better. So just saying if you thought it as meh the first time (like me) see it a second time

By: Jack

Jack — Thu, 07 May 2009 04:12:04 +0000

CGI was awful in this movie, they should have used ILM. The Xavier helicopter scene reminded me of Forrest Gump in the end when they were walking on the plantation and not moving. That was 15 years ago and it looks like they used the same type of CGI.

By: Simeon

Simeon — Mon, 04 May 2009 22:07:01 +0000

are they gonna make another x-man movie after x-man origins :? i wanna know , cuz i liked this one very much and i’m anxious to know if wolverine finally finds out who is he

By: T-Vo

T-Vo — Mon, 04 May 2009 20:59:50 +0000

Deadpool makes a bit more sense now. Being that he was dumped in the bottom of 3 mile island, a nuclear reactor, that could explain his cancer story thats in the comics.
Did anyone else see the Quicksilver cameo and who I took as Banshee? There was a red headed kid that was in the first cage with a muzzle over his mouth, Banshee anyone?

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 04 May 2009 20:30:27 +0000

“Otherwise I suggest you subscribe to a suspension of disbelief before you make yourself crazy. And just don’t think about lightsabers at all. Ever.”

LOL…no kidding.

By: tzaylor

tzaylor — Mon, 04 May 2009 16:58:23 +0000

my mistake…..I was thinking Storm got him with lightning but that was toad wasn’t it. It’s been too long.

By: Iknewthiswouldhappen

Iknewthiswouldhappen — Mon, 04 May 2009 15:38:03 +0000

i drink to remember.
shhhhhhhh…
who are you supposed to be?

were there any more? looked just like the work print, didn’t change my opinion of the movie. was entertaining, but could have been , should have been way better. just like x3, didn’t really like it, but I really didn’t hate it either, this falls into the category of so much wasted potential.

By: Devan Price

Devan Price — Mon, 04 May 2009 13:08:21 +0000

i agree with both of you.

Michael: I love real special effects with a passion and think that it might be lost forever 0_0
if done right its amazing and real. I hate the misuse of CGI like in Watchmen when they cut off the big guys arms. they used CGI which looked horrible and killed my movie joy.

Rodney: If used correct yes CGI is more ethical for movies. because it does cost a shit load just to plant little charges in the ground for your actor to run by (and mess up on first try) then it does CGI. Relating to what Michael said about it sucking for this part is because it just didn’t look real and would have been better to just have the charges in the ground. just like the arm cutting scene in Watchmen would have been better if they put prosthetics on the actor.

… and ya random?!?!?!?!?

By: Rodney

Rodney — Mon, 04 May 2009 05:51:26 +0000

You gave your thoughts on it before, and people offered possible outcomes. But you just say “that’s not possible” and repeat the issue again.

And here you are doing it again.