<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MGM still Remaking Poltergeist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227944</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227944</guid>
		<description>They have been talking about a Goonies sequel or remake for a long time now.  That&#039;s not new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have been talking about a Goonies sequel or remake for a long time now.  That&#8217;s not new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227911</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227911</guid>
		<description>UGH....next they&#039;ll want to remake The Goonies!  Leave my 80&#039;s classics alone, Hollywood!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGH&#8230;.next they&#8217;ll want to remake The Goonies!  Leave my 80&#8217;s classics alone, Hollywood!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227865</guid>
		<description>Get ready for yet another bad film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get ready for yet another bad film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227789</guid>
		<description>NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, AND NOOOOOOOOOO!

(I am against the idea of a Poltergeist remake, if my message is a tad too subtle.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, AND NOOOOOOOOOO!</p>
<p>(I am against the idea of a Poltergeist remake, if my message is a tad too subtle.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227767</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227767</guid>
		<description>They did use a body double in a few scenes but they never showed her face.  O&#039;Rourke looked different because of the medicine she was taking..it made her face swell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did use a body double in a few scenes but they never showed her face.  O&#8217;Rourke looked different because of the medicine she was taking..it made her face swell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RPM</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227757</link>
		<dc:creator>RPM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227757</guid>
		<description>I know Rodney has certain rules for remakes and I&#039;m not at all against them in general, but Poltergeist,I think, really stands up well even after all these years. It was a great experience that can&#039;t be duplicated and trying to will just muddy the memory of the original. For example- 
The little blonde girl was awesome, the creepy little lady with the spooky voice was brilliant, Craig T. Nelson and Jobeth Williams were perfectly cast as the suburban, 80&#039;s parents. It&#039;s just unnecesary to remake this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Rodney has certain rules for remakes and I&#8217;m not at all against them in general, but Poltergeist,I think, really stands up well even after all these years. It was a great experience that can&#8217;t be duplicated and trying to will just muddy the memory of the original. For example-<br />
The little blonde girl was awesome, the creepy little lady with the spooky voice was brilliant, Craig T. Nelson and Jobeth Williams were perfectly cast as the suburban, 80&#8217;s parents. It&#8217;s just unnecesary to remake this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fullmetal_medji</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227734</link>
		<dc:creator>fullmetal_medji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227734</guid>
		<description>A remake sounds good, but from all the things I&#039;ve heard about the Poltergeist curse I wouldn&#039;t touch it if I were film maker.  I wonder if Spielberg would produce this (what am I saying, of course not).  Still, I dare someone to remake the Exorcist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A remake sounds good, but from all the things I&#8217;ve heard about the Poltergeist curse I wouldn&#8217;t touch it if I were film maker.  I wonder if Spielberg would produce this (what am I saying, of course not).  Still, I dare someone to remake the Exorcist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedup</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227729</link>
		<dc:creator>fedup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227729</guid>
		<description>ps, no CG is not cheaper. it&#039;s just that you can accomplish more digitally, than you can on a practical set. 
There are no &quot;Lightning&quot; ,&quot;make it snow&quot;, &quot; make a cool explosion&quot;, or  &quot;CG ghost&quot; buttons.
next time you watch a vfx driven movie, fast Foreward to the end credits, (The VERY end bc they don&#039;t get any recognition) to the effects houses and look at the ARMY of people working on it. seriously, the stuff ain&#039;t easy, and takes hours to DAYS to make a one and a half second shot look good.
CG is huge in films because you are not constrained by location, and practice effects, and a limit as to what a tangible, real prop can produce. you don&#039;t have to actually FILL a stadium of people with extras, or wait on the &quot;perfect&quot; time of day.

-BUT. it is not cheap, and it is NOT easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps, no CG is not cheaper. it&#8217;s just that you can accomplish more digitally, than you can on a practical set.<br />
There are no &#8220;Lightning&#8221; ,&#8221;make it snow&#8221;, &#8221; make a cool explosion&#8221;, or  &#8220;CG ghost&#8221; buttons.<br />
next time you watch a vfx driven movie, fast Foreward to the end credits, (The VERY end bc they don&#8217;t get any recognition) to the effects houses and look at the ARMY of people working on it. seriously, the stuff ain&#8217;t easy, and takes hours to DAYS to make a one and a half second shot look good.<br />
CG is huge in films because you are not constrained by location, and practice effects, and a limit as to what a tangible, real prop can produce. you don&#8217;t have to actually FILL a stadium of people with extras, or wait on the &#8220;perfect&#8221; time of day.</p>
<p>-BUT. it is not cheap, and it is NOT easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedup</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227727</link>
		<dc:creator>fedup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227727</guid>
		<description>PLEASE STOP
stopstopstopstop

seriously. STOP.

you&#039;re in a fix?
need a movie to get you out of finacial trouble?

how&#039;s about get one of those people you pay a decent amount of cash to go a find a story written by one of the THOUSANDS of writers out there, and make that.

PLease stop trying to live vicariously thru Generation X by attempting to re-create all the things that made up the excitement, and IMAGINATION of their childhood.

I am so sick and tired of these prequels, sequels, remakes, and &quot;re-envisioning&quot; of movies, and television shows from the 80&#039;s.
there is Absolutely NO reason other than a ( hopefully) cash cow for the studios. No one cares about how much it made opening weekend. That film still holds up today, visually, and thru it&#039;s cinematography, and it&#039;s storytelling. go rent/netflix/download/or buy it and watch it if you need to.

This crap is getting ridiculous, and eventually people are going to get tired of it and the ensuing backlash is going to cause a crash in the movie industry as well.

-MOVE Forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE STOP<br />
stopstopstopstop</p>
<p>seriously. STOP.</p>
<p>you&#8217;re in a fix?<br />
need a movie to get you out of finacial trouble?</p>
<p>how&#8217;s about get one of those people you pay a decent amount of cash to go a find a story written by one of the THOUSANDS of writers out there, and make that.</p>
<p>PLease stop trying to live vicariously thru Generation X by attempting to re-create all the things that made up the excitement, and IMAGINATION of their childhood.</p>
<p>I am so sick and tired of these prequels, sequels, remakes, and &#8220;re-envisioning&#8221; of movies, and television shows from the 80&#8217;s.<br />
there is Absolutely NO reason other than a ( hopefully) cash cow for the studios. No one cares about how much it made opening weekend. That film still holds up today, visually, and thru it&#8217;s cinematography, and it&#8217;s storytelling. go rent/netflix/download/or buy it and watch it if you need to.</p>
<p>This crap is getting ridiculous, and eventually people are going to get tired of it and the ensuing backlash is going to cause a crash in the movie industry as well.</p>
<p>-MOVE Forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iam Wright</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/10/mgm-still-remaking-poltergeist#comment-227726</link>
		<dc:creator>Iam Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=22626#comment-227726</guid>
		<description>I loved Poltergeist as a kid and love it today. I do agree that this could be great for a remake but ,as with all other remakes, can be truly awful.
If they keep the campiness  down and keep it serious, this should be real good and Vadim Perelman is an interesting choice for directing and could be the best for it. Again, could be the worse.

I guess I am truly 50/50 on this. =/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Poltergeist as a kid and love it today. I do agree that this could be great for a remake but ,as with all other remakes, can be truly awful.<br />
If they keep the campiness  down and keep it serious, this should be real good and Vadim Perelman is an interesting choice for directing and could be the best for it. Again, could be the worse.</p>
<p>I guess I am truly 50/50 on this. =/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
