You are Here » News Chat » Uwe Boll to bring us Bloodrayne 3: Warhammer
News Chat
November 20, 2009

Uwe Boll to bring us Bloodrayne 3: Warhammer

— Posted by Rodney

Uwe Boll is getting his name back in the media after a little break from the Boll overkill. And now he is going to perform miracles. It isn’t his promise to make a good movie, he always thinks he is doing that and is not shy to talk about it.

He is creating life out of nothing. If I am not mistaken Bloodrayne is the only Boll video game film to get a sequel – Because there was a second game. And now where there is no third game to base another film on, Boll is just going to run with it anyways!


The simplest answer is, Uwe Boll. Maybe it’s the fact that the original Rayne, Kristanna Loken is coming back. My question arises again, why? There’s no third game so there’s not a plot, of course you can come up with one, but Boll isn’t just anyone.

While Kirstanna Loken is easy on the eyes and will be returning to the skimpy outfits and gratuitous violence.

The subtitle Warhammer is another game franchise, so the title Bloodrayne 3: Warhammer offers some confusion but it might also have to do with the lack of a plot so we have no clue what Warhammer might mean.

But is it a Video Game adaptation if its not based on an existing game but still has the same character?

This post was written by :

who has written 8899 posts on The Movie Blog

visit author's website | Contact the Author

19 thoughts on “Uwe Boll to bring us Bloodrayne 3: Warhammer

  1. I have to say, I liked the first movie better. But that might have something to do with my obsession with the corsettes, and dresses and 1700-century at all. And I just love Kristanna Lokens movies. I think she is a good actress, although that is just my personal view of things. And when I have seen one movie with special actors, I can’t stand a sequel without them in the castings. So, I’m very happy that Kristanna gets a second chance. T.T I love you, Kristanna!!! Sorry about that, I had a sudden fangirl-obsession. Well, I’m looking forward to seeing the third movie. But now, I’m expecting a lot of blood and vampire-ness. And let us not forget about the talismans in this movie. In the first movie, she has absorbed the eye and heart, and then she has a brown and a blue eye. But in the second, she only has two brown eyes. And honestly, I am very dissapointed at such a flaw! Well, now I’ve written too much! But I’m still looking forward to the third movie! Bye!

  2. This is sad. I hope someone else gets rights to BloodRayne, makes a completely new movie simply titled “BloodRayne” and completely retcons all the work of Bolls.

  3. Actually both House of the Dead and Alone in the Dark had sequels. Didn’t see Alone 2 but House 2 was quite decent, but although better than the first it wasn’t half as funny!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Around the Web
"A Census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti."

— Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lector from Silence of the Lambs, 1991

    Archives