— Estelle Reiner as Customer from When Harry Met Sally..., 1989
You are Here » Features » Kenny Sayz, Sorry Entertainment Weekly, Ben Affleck isnt the Entertainer of the Year
November 30, 2012
Kenny Sayz, Sorry Entertainment Weekly, Ben Affleck isnt the Entertainer of the Year
— Posted by Kenny Miles
Entertainment Weekly declared Ben Affleck as 2012′s Entertainer of the Year…all because he released one amusing spy thriller “Argo.” While his emergence as a director is an impressive welcoming departure of his mess of a career, in my opinion, it doesn’t make him 2012′s Entertainer of the Year. John Hawkes was very entertaining in both “The Sessions” and “Lincoln.” His presence was felt in TWO movies this year, and Mr. Hawkes wont receive 10% of the publicity Ben Affleck. Mr. Affleck starred and directed in just one film that brought adult audiences to the theaters but before year’s end, it might be overshadowed. ”Lincoln” is on the verge of completely dominating “Argo” in box office and award season. And “Les Mis” and “Zero Dark Thirty” have barely been seen. I have a theory as to why Affleck was really chosen, but lets take a look at other appropriate choices that would fit the mold of Entertainment Weekly demo:
As much hatred is spewed toward Kristen Stewart, she has had quite a year. She closed out the “Twilight” franchise, transitioned out of that roll into “the fairest one of all” starring in the summer blockbuster “Snow White & The Huntmen,” and has strong buzz for her dramatic turn in the indie film “On the Road.” Those accomplishments should calm down the haters. And EW loves “Twilight!”
And lets not forget that “Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlene flawlessly transitioned from TV to the big screen due to the monster financial success of “Ted.” (An original film grossing over $200 million nationally.) He is hosting the Oscars in part to his gig on SNL as well as this accomplishment.
I think this unexpected positive publicity will help Mr. Affleck’s Oscar chances significantly because in the terms of the Oscar race, “Argo” peaked too soon and could be forgotten by the end of 2012. I have my suspensions as to why he was chosen. Coincidentally, Entertainment Weekly belongs to the Warner Brothers conglomerate which is the studio that distributed “Argo.” Warner Brothers and Entertainment Weekly are both owned by Time Warner. (Hello, conflict of interest!?!) This seems suspect that he would be named Entertainer of the Year at a time “Argo” is losing awards buzz. This publicity and crossing $100 million the same week brings it back into the conversation.
My other gripe: the year hasn’t ended yet and it is premature to declare Affleck this accolade. In fact, TIME Magazine’s Richard Corliss declared that “Zero Dark Thirty” quote “blows ‘Argo’ out of the water.” Why give kudos to the director of a movie that is about to get “blown out of the water?” If the critical praise for “Zero Dark Thirty” holds up like we are hearing, Entertainment Weekly will look very foolish for prematurely calling Ben Affleck the Entertainer of the Year especially over other filmmakers and actors who consistently dominated 2012.
This post was written by :
Whether something is overlooked by Hollywood or whatever business trend has captured the Entertainment Industry’s attention, Kenny Miles loves to talk about movies (especially the cultural impact of a film). He covers various aspects of movies including specialty genre films, limited release, independent, foreign language, documentary features, and THE much infamous "awards season." Also, he likes to offer his opinion on the business of film, marketing strategy, and branding. He currently resides in Denver, Colorado and is a member of the Denver Film Critics Society critics group. When he isn’t writing, Kenny channels his passion for interacting with moviegoers (something most movie pundits lack) as a pollster for the market research company CinemaScore and working as floor staff/special events coordinator in the film community. You can follow him on Twitter @kmiles723.
Around the Web